Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T12:05:10.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IV.—Remarks on Serpentine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

T. G. Bonney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The very full and able review of Dr. Sterry Hunt's paper on “The Geological History of Serpentine,”1 gives me an opportunity, of which I have been for some time desirous, of commenting on certain parts of it relating to my investigations of the typical rock which bears that name. In commenting adversely upon these, I must not be supposed to express a difference of opinion in regard to every part of the paper, because there are many relating to the Archæan schists with which I am in general agreement.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 1 , Issue 9 , September 1884 , pp. 406 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1884

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 406 note 1 See page 276 of the present volume.

page 407 note 1 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxxiii. p. 884; vol. xxxix. p. 1. See also vol. xxxiv. p. 770; vol. xxxvii. p. 40.Google ScholarGeol. Mag. Dec. II. Vol. VI. p. 362; Vol. VII. p. 538.Google Scholar

page 408 note 1 The italics are mine.

page 410 note 1 Serpentine under pressure sometimes assumes a schistose aspect. This has added to the difficulties of distinguishing the rock from simulative forms.

page 411 note 1 Science, 1883, p. 255.