Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-s6l46 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T14:34:04.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First finds of problematic Ediacaran fossil Gaojiashania in Siberia and its origin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2009

ANDREY YU. ZHURAVLEV ,
JOSÉ ANTONIO GÁMEZ VINTANED  and
ANDREY YU. IVANTSOV
ANDREY YU. ZHURAVLEV*
Affiliation:
Área y Museo de Paleontología, Departamento de Ciencias de la Tierra, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Zaragoza, c/Pedro Cerbuna, 12, E-50009, Zaragoza, Spain
JOSÉ ANTONIO GÁMEZ VINTANED
Affiliation:
Área y Museo de Paleontología, Departamento de Ciencias de la Tierra, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Zaragoza, c/Pedro Cerbuna, 12, E-50009, Zaragoza, Spain
ANDREY YU. IVANTSOV
Affiliation:
Palaeontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Profsoyuznaya 123, Moscow 117997, Russia
*
†Author for correspondence: ayzhur@mail.ru
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We describe the first occurrence of the problematic fossil Gaojiashania outside China, in the Ediacaran Yudoma Group of the Siberian Platform. In both areas, Gaojiashania characterizes the lower upper Ediacaran strata and precedes the appearance of Cloudina and other skeletal fossils, which highlights its significance for the Ediacaran subdivision and correlation. Features of this fossil such as indeterminate length, the absence of a distinct growth pattern, and self-avoiding behaviour indicate its trace fossil origin but do not necessarily imply metazoan affinities for its producers. Several organisms including stem-group social amoebozoans and unicellular protists may have been Proterozoic trace fossil producers.

Keywords

Ediacaran PeriodSiberian PlatformGaojiashanianon-metazoan trace fossils

Information

Type
Rapid Communication
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 146 , Issue 5 , September 2009 , pp. 775 - 780
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bengtson, S., Rasmussen, B. & Krapez, B. 2007. The Paleoproterozoic megascopic Stirling biota. Paleobiology 33, 351–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z., Sun, W.-G. & Hua, H. 2002. Preservation and morphological interpretation of Late Sinian Gaojiashania from southern Shaanxi. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 41, 448–54 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Ding, L.-F., Zhang, L., Li, Y. & Dong, J. 1992. The Study of the Late Sinian–Early Cambrian Biotas from the Northern Margin of Yangtze Platform. Beijing: Scientific and Technical Documents Publishing House, 135 pp. (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Dong, L., Xiao, S., Shen, B. & Zhou, C. 2008. Silicified Horodyskia and Palaeopascichnus from Upper Ediacaran cherts in South China: Tentative phylogenetic interpretation and implications for evolutionary stasis. Journal of the Geological Society, London 165, 367–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichinger, L. & 96 others. 2005. The genome of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Nature 435, 43–57.Google Scholar
Fedonkin, M. A. 1985. Palaeoichnology of the Vendian Metazoa. In The Vendian System. Historical–Geological and Palaeontological Grounds, vol. 1: Paleontology (eds Sokolov, B. S. & Ivanovskiy, B. A.), pp. 112–7. Moscow: Nauka (English translation: The Vendian System, vol. 1: Paleontology. Berlin: Springer, 1990).Google Scholar
Fedonkin, M. A. & Yochelson, E. L. 2002. Middle Proterozoic (1.5 Ga) Horodyskia moniliformis Yochelson and Fedonkin, the oldest known tissue-grade colonial eucaryote. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 94, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedonkin, M. A., Gehling, J. G., Grey, K., Narbonne, G. & Vickers-Rich, P. 2007. The Rise of Animals: Evolution and Diversification of the Kingdom Animalia. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 327 pp.Google Scholar
Grey, K., Williams, I. R., Martin, D. M., Fedonkin, M. A. & Gehling, J. G. 2002. New occurrence of ‘string of beads’ in the Bangemall Supergroup: a potential biostratigraphic marker horizon. Western Australian Geological Survey Annual Review 2000, 69–73.Google Scholar
Gross, J. D. 1994. Developmental decisions in Dictyostelium discoideum. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 58, 330–51.Google Scholar
Haines, P. W. 2000. Problematic fossils in the late Neoproterozoic Wonoka Formation, South Australia. Precambrian Research 100, 97–108.Google Scholar
Han, Z. & Firtel, R. A. 1998. The homeobox-containing gene Wariai regulates anerior–posterior patterning and cell-type homeostasis in Dictyostelium. Development 125, 313–25.Google Scholar
Hua, H., Chen, Z. & Zhang, L.Y. 2004. Shaanxilithes from Taozichong Formation of Guizhou Province and its significance. Journal of Stratigraphy 28, 265–9 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Hua, H., Zhang, L.-Y., Zhang, Z.-F. & Wang, J.-P. 2000. Fossil evidences of latest Neoproterozoic Gaojiashan biota and their characteristics. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 39, 507–15 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Jensen, S. 2003. The Proterozoic and earliest Cambrian trace fossil record; patterns, problems and perspectives. Integrative and Comparative Biology 43, 219–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, R. R. 1997. Dictyostelium development: Lower STATs. Current Biology 7, R723–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuzdzal-Fick, J. J., Foster, K. R., Queller, D. C. & Strassmann, J. E. 2007. Exploiting new terrain: an advantage to sociality in the slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum. Behavioral Ecology 18, 433–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, S., Zhang, Y. & Zhang, S. 1986. Body and trace fossils of Metazoa and algal macrofossils from the Upper Sinian Gaojiashan Formation in southern Shaanxi. Shaanxi Dizhi 4, 9–17 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Matz, M. V., Frank, T. M., Marshall, N. J., Widder, E. A. & Johnsen, S. 2008. Giant deep-sea protist produces bilaterian-like traces. Current Biology 18, 1849–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nikolaev, S. I., Berney, C., Fahrni, J. F., Bolivar, I., Polet, S., Mylnikov, A. P., Aleshin, V. V., Petrov, N. B. & Pawlowski, J. 2004. The twilight of Heliozoa and rise of Rhizaria, an emerging supergroup of amoeboid eukaryotes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 8066–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schopf, J. W. & Klein, C. (eds) 1992. The Proterozoic Biosphere: A Multidisciplinary Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1348 pp.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A., Grazhdankin, D. & Legouta, A. 2003. Ediacaran biota: The dawn of animal life in the shadow of giant protists. Paleontological Research 7, 43–54.Google Scholar
Semikhatov, M. A., Komar, V. A. & Serebryakov, S. N. 1970. The Yudoma Complex in the stratotype area. Trudy Geologicheskogo instituta Akademii nauk SSSR 210, 1–207 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Semikhatov, M. A., Ovchinnikova, G. V., Gorokhov, I. M., Kuznetsov, A. B., Kaurova, O. K. & Petrov, P. Yu. 2003. Pb–Pb isochronous age and Sr-isotope characteristics of the upper Yudoma carbonate strata (Vendian of the Yudoma-Maya Depression, Eastern Siberia). Doklady Rossiyskoy akademii nauk 393, 83–7 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Shen, B., Xiao, S., Dong, L., Zhou, C. & Liu, J. 2007. Problematic macrofossils from Ediacaran successions in the North China and Chaidam blocks: Implications for their evolutionary roots and biostratigraphic significance. Journal of Paleontology 81, 1396–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternfeld, J. & O'Mara, R. 2005. Aerial migration of the Dictyostelium slug. Development, Growth & Differentiation 47, 49–58.Google Scholar
Wallraff, E. & Wallraff, H. G. 1997. Migrating and bidirectional phototaxis in Dictyostelium discoideum slugs lacking the action cross-linking 120 kDa gelation factor. Journal of Experimental Biology 200, 3213–20.Google Scholar
Weber, B., Steiner, M. & Zhu, M.-Y. 2007. Precambrian–Cambrian trace fossils from the Yangtze Platform (South China) and the early evolution of bilaterian lifestyles. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 254, 328–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xing, Y., Ding, Q., Luo, H., He, T., Wang, Y. et al. 1984. The Sinian–Cambrian boundary of China. Bulletin of the Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences 10 (1983), Special Issue, 1–262 (in Chinese with abridged English version).Google Scholar
Yang, S. & Zhang, Z. 1985. The Sinian trace fossils from Zhengmuguan Formation of Helashan Mountain, Ningxia. Earth Sciences–Journal of Wuhan College of Geology 10, 9–28 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Yochelson, E. L. & Fedonkin, M. A. 2000. A new tissue-grade organism 1.5 billion years old from Montana. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 113, 843–7.Google Scholar
Zhang, L.-Y. 1986. A discovery and preliminary study of the Late Sinian stage Gaojiashan Biota from Ningqiang County, Shaanxi. Bulletin of the Xi'an Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences 13, 67–88 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar