Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-9h5t2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T03:41:45.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parental imprinting on the mouse X chromosome: effects on the early development of X0, XXY and XXX embryos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Takashi Tada ,
Nobuo Takagi  and
Ilse-Dore Adler
Takashi Tada
Affiliation:
Research Center for Molecular Genetics and Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
Nobuo Takagi*
Affiliation:
Research Center for Molecular Genetics and Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
Ilse-Dore Adler
Affiliation:
Institut für Säugetiergenetik, Forschungcentrum für Umwelt und Gesundheit Neuherberg, 85758 Oberschleissheim, Germany
*
* Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To examine the effects of X-chromosome imprinting during early mouse embryogenesis, we attempted to produce XM0, Xp0, XMXMY, XMXPY and XMXMXP (where XM and Xp stand for the maternally and the paternally derived X chromosome, respectively) making use of mouse strains bearing the translocation Rb(X.2)2Ad and the inversion In(X)1H. Unlike XMXPY embryos, XMXMY and XMXMXP conceptuses suffered from severe growth retardation or abnormal development characterized by deficient extra-embryonic structures at 6.5–7.5 days post coitum (dpc). A cytogenetic study suggested that two XM chromosomes remaining active in certain non-epiblast cells were responsible for the serious developmental abnormality found in these embryos disomic for XM. Although matings involving females heterozygous for Rb(X.2)2Ad hinted at the paucity of XP0 embryos relative to those having the complementary karyotype of XMXMXP, further study of embryos from matings between females heterozygous for In(X)1H and Rb2Ad males did not substantiate this observation. Thus, the extensive peri-implantation loss of XP0 embryos shown by Hunt (1991) may be confined to XO mothers. Taken together, this study failed to reveal a parentally imprinted X-linked gene essential for early mouse embryogenesis other than the one most probably corresponding to the X-chromosome inactivation centre.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , October 1993 , pp. 139 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

References

Adler, I.-D., Johannison, R. & Winking, H. (1989). The influence of the Robertsonian translocation Rb(X.2)2Ad on anaphase I non-disjunction in male laboratory mice. Genetical Research 53, 77–86.Google Scholar
Beechey, C. V. & Cattanach, B. M. (1993). Genetic imprinting map. Mouse Genome 91, 102–104.Google Scholar
Beechey, C. V., Burtenshaw, M. D. & Evans, E. P. (1992). An exceptional fertile, mosaic female mouse carrying two trisomic chromosome populations. Mouse Genome 90, 213–215.Google Scholar
Brook, J. D. (1983). X-chromosome segregation, maternal age and aneuploidy in the X0 mouse. Genetical Research 41, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoyne, P. S., Tarn, P. P. L. & Evans, E. P. (1983). Retarded development of X0 conceptuses during early pregnancy in the mouse. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 68, 387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattanach, B. M. (1961). A chemically-induced variegation-type position effect in the mouse. Z. Vererbungslehre 92, 165–182.Google Scholar
Endo, A. & Watanabe, T. (1989). A case of X-trisomy in the mouse. Cytogenetics Cell Genetics 52, 98–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, E. P. & Phillips, R. J. S. (1975). Inversion heterozygosity and the origin of X0 daughters of Bpa/+ female mice. Nature 256, 40–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handel, M. A. & Hunt, P. A. (1991). Genomic imprinting: male mice with uniparentally derived sex chromosomes. Molecular Reproduction and Development 28, 337–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassold, T., Pettay, D., May, K. & Robinson, A. (1990). Analysis of non-disjunction in sex chromosome tetrasomy and pentasomy. Human Genetics 85, 648–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodgkin, J. (1990). Sex determination compared in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis. Nature 344, 721–728.Google Scholar
Hunt, P. A. (1991). Survival of X0 mouse fetuses: EfTect of parental origin of the X chromosome or uterine environment. Development 111, 1137–1141.Google Scholar
Jacobs, P. A., Hassold, T. J., Whittington, E., Butler, G., Collyer, S., Keston, M. & Lee, M. (1988). Klinefelter's syndrome: analysis of the origin of the additional sex chromosome using molecular probes. Annals Human Genetics 52, 93–109.Google Scholar
Kaufman, M. H. (1972). Non-random segregation during mammalian oogenesis. Nature 238, 465–466.Google Scholar
Kaufman, M. H., Barton, S. C. & Surani, M. A. H. (1977). Normal postimplantation development of mouse par-thenogenetic embryos to the forelimb bud stage. Nature 265, 53–55.Google Scholar
Luthardt, F. W. (1976). Cytogenetic analysis of oocytes and early preimplantation embryos from X0 mice. Developmental Biology 54, 73–81.Google Scholar
Lyon, M. F. (1961). Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.). Nature 22, 372–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, J. R. & Lovell-Badge, R. H. (1987). The development of X0 gynogenetic mouse embryos. Development 99, 411–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, J. R. & Lovell-Badge, R. H. (1988). Two maternally derived X chromosomes contribute to parthenogenetic inviability. Development 103, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, Y. & Chapman, V. M. (1992). Analysis of sex-chromosome aneuploidy in interspecific backcross progeny between the laboratory mouse strain C57BL/6 and Mus spretus. Cytogenetics Cell Genetics 60, 74–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, K. M., Jacobs, P. A., Lee, M., Ratclilfe, S., Robinson, A., Nielsen, J. & Hassold, T. J. (1990) The parental origin of the extra X chromosome in 47, XXX females. American Journal of Human Genetics 46, 754–761.Google Scholar
McGrath, J. & Solter, D. (1984). Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes. Cell 37, 179–183.Google Scholar
Morris, T. (1968). The X0 and 0Y chromosome constitutions in the mouse. Genetical Research 12, 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monk, M. & Harper, M. I. (1979). Sequential X chromosome inactivation coupled with cellular differentiation in early mouse embryos. Nature 281, 311–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Omoe, K. & Endo, A. (1993). Growth and development of 39, X mouse embryos at mid-gestation. Cytogenetics Cell Genetics 63, 50–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, R. J. S. & Kaufman, M. H. (1974). Barepatches, a new sex-linked gene in the mouse, associated with a high production of X0 females. II. Investigations into the nature and mechanisms of the X0 production. Genetical Research 24, 27–41.Google Scholar
Quinn, P., Barros, C. & Whittingham, D. G. (1982). Preservation of hamster oocytes to assay the fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 66, 161–168.Google Scholar
Shao, J. & Takagi, N. (1990). An extra maternally derived X chromosome is deleterious to early mouse development. Development 110, 969–975.Google Scholar
Surani, M. A. H., Barton, S. C. & Norris, M. (1986). Nuclear transplantation in the mouse: heritable differences between parental genomes after activation of the embryonic genome. Cell 45, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tada, T. & Takagi, N. (1992). Early development and X-chromosome inactivation in mouse parthenogenetic embryos. Molecular Reproduction and Development 31, 20–27.Google Scholar
Takagi, N. (1992). Abnormal X-chromosome dosage compensation as a possible cause of early developmental failure in mice. Development Growth and Differentiation 33, 429–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takagi, N. & Abe, K. (1990). Detrimental effects of two active X chromosomes on early mouse development. Development 109, 189–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takagi, N. & Oshimura, M. (1973). Fluorescence and Giemsa banding studies of the allocyclic X chromosome in embryonic and adult mouse cells. Experimental Cell Research 78, 127–135.Google Scholar
Takagi, N. & Sasaki, M. (1975). Preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X chromosome in the extraembryonic membranes of the mouse. Nature 256, 640–642.Google Scholar
Takagi, N., Sugawara, O. & Sasaki, M. (1982). Regional and temporal changes in the pattern of X-chromosome replication during the early post-implantation development of the female mouse. Chromosoma 85, 275–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tease, C. & Fisher, G. (1991). Two new X-autosome Robertsonian translocations in the mouse. I. Meiotic chromosome segregation in male hemizygotes and female heterozygotes. Genetical Research 58, 115–121.Google Scholar
West, J. D., Frels, W. I., Chapman, V. M. & Papaioannou, V. E. (1977). Preferential expression of the maternally derived X-chromosome in the mouse yolk sac. Cell 12, 873–882.Google Scholar
Wroblewska, J. & Dyban, A. P. (1969). Chromosome preparation from embryos during early organogenesis: dissociation after fixation, followed by air drying. Stain Technology 44, 147–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar