Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T23:47:10.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assetization: A technoscientific or financial phenomenon?

Review products

Kean Birch and Fabian Muniesa (eds.), Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2020, 338 pp., $40.00 (pbk), ISBN 978-0-262-53917-3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Philipp Golka
Philipp Golka*
Affiliation:
Leiden University, Netherlands
*
Corresponding author: Philipp Golka, Universiteit Leiden, Turfmarkt 99, 2511 DP The Hague. Email: p.j.m.golka@fgga.leidenuniv.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Finance and financialization have dominated scholarship on capitalism and society for the past decade. Although scholars noted early on that the expansion of finance relies on the creation (and trade) of new financial assets, assets and assetization have been a blind spot as scholarship continued to focus on financial markets (Langley, 2020). This, however, is currently about to change as a number of landmark publications have been published in the past months that point toward growing momentum in the field of asset and assetization research. In this short essay, I review Kean Birch and Fabian Muniesa's edited collection, Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism, which is of central importance to said momentum, and put it into dialogue with some of the other recent publications on this topic.

Keywords

Assetsassetizationfinancializationvaluation studiespolitical economy
Type
Review essay
Information
Finance and Society , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , 2021 , pp. 88 - 93
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© 2021 The Author(s)

References

Adkins, L., Cooper, M. and Konings, M. (2020) The Asset Economy: Property Ownership and the New Logic of Inequality. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Birch, K. and Muniesa, F. (2020) Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, B. (forthcoming) Asset manager capitalism as a corporate governance regime. In: Hacker, J.S., Hertel-Fernandez, A., Pierson, P. and Thelen, K. (eds.) American Political Economy: Institutions, Interests, and Inequalities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chiapello, E. (2015) Financialisation of valuation. Human Studies, 38(1): 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiapello, E. (2019) Financialization as a socio-technical process. In: Mader, M., Mertens, D. and van der Zwan, N. (eds.) The Routledge International Handbook of Financialization. London: Routledge, 81–91.Google Scholar
Christophers, B. (2015) Value models: Finance, risk, and political economy. Finance and Society, 1(2): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabor, D. (2021) The Wall Street consensus. Development and Change, https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golka, P. (2019) Financialization as Welfare: Social Impact Investing and British Social Policy, 1997-2016. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, N. (2009) A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 74(3): 358–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knafo, S. and Dutta, S.J. (2020) The myth of the shareholder revolution and the financialization of the firm. Review of International Political Economy, 27(3): 476–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, P. (2020) Assets and assetization in financialized capitalism. Review of International Political Economy, https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1830828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, P. and Leyshon, A. (2017) Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalization of digital economic circulation. Finance and Society, 3(1): 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniesa, F., Liliana, D., Ortiz, H., Pina-Stranger, Á., Paterson, F., Bourgoin, A., Ehrenstein, V., Juven, P.-A., Pontille, D., Saraç-Lesavre, B. and Yon, G. (eds.) (2017) Capitalization: A Cultural Guide. Paris: Presses des Mines.Google Scholar
Mützel, S. (2009) Networks as culturally constituted processes: A comparison of relational sociology and actor-network theory. Current Sociology, 57(6): 871–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petry, J. (2020) From national marketplaces to global providers of financial infrastructures: Exchanges, infrastructures and structural power in global finance. New Political Economy, https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2020.1782368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seabrooke, L. (2010) Everyday legitimacy and institutional change. In: Gofas, A. and Hay, C. (eds.) The Role of Ideas in Political Analysis: A Portrait of Contemporary Debates. London: Routledge, 78–93.Google Scholar