Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T13:39:53.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Richard Hasen, The Supreme Court and Election Law: Judging Equality from Baker V Carr to Bush V Gore (New York University Press, 2003)

Review products

Richard Hasen, The Supreme Court and Election Law: Judging Equality from Baker V Carr to Bush V Gore (New York University Press, 2003)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2025

David Tucker
David Tucker*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Melbourne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Federal Law Review , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 505 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 The Australian National University

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Richard, Hasen, The Supreme Court and Election Law: Judging Equality from Baker v Carr to Bush v Gore (2003) 103Google Scholar

2 John, Ely, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (1980)Google Scholar

3 Hasen, above n 1, 4 6.

4 Ibid 5

5 369 US 186 (1962).

6 Hasen, above n 1, 79.

7 531 US 98 (2000).

8 Hasen, above n 1, 12.

9 Ibid 102 (emphasis in original).

10 424 US 1 (1976) ('Buckley').

11 2 USC 431 55 (1988).

12 Buckley 421 US 1, 48 9 (1976) quoted in Hasen, above n 1, 106.

13 Hasen, above n 1, 81.

14 Ibid 79.

15 Ibid 106 7.

16 Quoted in ibid 107 (emphasis in original).

17 Ibid 154.

18 Ibid 164.

19 Ibid.

20 Ibid 9.