Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T01:27:25.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In the Marriage of Stowe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2025

Philippa Lynch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Family Law — Property settlements — Companies own matrimonial assets — Interim injunctions — Whether the position of third party shareholders is a relevant consideration — Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s. 114

Type
Case Notes
Information
Federal Law Review , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 1981 , pp. 362 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 The Australian National University

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 (1980) 6 Fam. L.R. 757; [1981] F.L.C. 91-027. Full Court of the Family Court of Australia; Evatt C.J., Murray and Gibson JJ.

2 “The Act”.

3 (1980) 6 Fam. L.R. 757,767; (1981] F.LC. 76,262.

4 (1979) 24 A.L.R. 357; (1979) 4 Fam. L.R. 713; [1979] F.L.C. 90-627; (1979) 35 F.L.R. 458.

5 (1979) 23 A.LR. 531; (1979) 5 Fam. L.R. 1; [1979] F.L.C. 90-616; (1979) 53 A.L.J.R. 359.

6 Sanders v. Sanders (1967) 116 C.L.R. 366; Antonarkis v. Delly (1976) 10 A.L.R.

7 Supra n. 4.

8 Collins and Collins (1977) 3 Fam. L.R. 11,424; [1977] F.L.C. 90-286; Kaljo and Kaljo (1978) 4 Fam. L.R. 190; [1978] F.L.C. 90-445.

9 Tiley and Tiley (1980) 6 Fam. L.R. 528; [1980] F.L.C. 90-895.

10 Evatt C.J., Emery S.J., Strauss J.; Stowe and Stowe (No. 2) [1981] F.L.C. 91-074.

11 No. 97 of 1981.

12 (1981) 6 Fam. L.C. 591; [1981] F.L.C. 91-000; (1981) 55 A.L.J.R. 233.

13 Id. 601; 76,061; 239.

14 Supra n. 5.

15 The Full Court of the Family Court (Evatt C.J., Watson and Joske JJ.) has subsequently taken a similar view in Harris App. No. 292 of 1980 9 November 1981 (as yet unreported). This case involved orders directed to companies which were effectively controlled by the husband's mother.

16 Constitution s. 51(.xx).

17 Page 37 of the High Court transcript.