Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T15:14:35.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Collins (Hass) v. The Queen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2025

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Case Notes
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 The Australian National University

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

(1975) 8 A.L.R. 150. High Court of Australia; Barwick C.J., McTieman, Stephen, Mason and Jacobs JJ.

References

2 [1943] A.C. 627.

3 Id. 638.

4 (1975) 8 A.L.R. 150, 152.

5 Ibid.

6 Id. 151.

7 0.70 r. 2(6).

8 (1975) 8 A.L.R. 150, 151.

9 Glynn v. Keele University [1971] 1 W.L.R. 487; Dyson v. Attorney-General [1911] 1 K.B. 410.

10 R. v. Aston University Senate; ex parte Rofjey [1969] 2 Q.B. 538; R. v. Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; ex parte Ozone Theatres (Aust.) Ltd (1949) 78 C.L.R. 389.

11 See generally Nygh, Conflict of Laws in Australia (2nd ed. 1971) 777-787CrossRefGoogle Scholar and John Robertson & Co. Ltd v. Ferguson Transformers Pty Ltd (1973) 129C.L.R. 65.

12 Lane, The Australian Federal System (1972) 388-391.Google Scholar

13 (1975) 8 A.L.R. 150, 152.