No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 January 2025
1 (1968) 42 A.L.J.R. 64; [1968] Argus L.R. 445. High Court of Australia; Barwick C.J., McTiernan, Kitto, Taylor and Owen JJ.
2 [1968] V.R. 95. Winneke C.J., Adam and Gowans JJ.
3 S. 35—
(1.) provides for an appeal from a State Supreme Court in the case of, inter alia—
(a) Every judgment, whether final or interlocutory, which— …
(2) involves directly or indirectly any claim, demand, or question, to or respecting any property or any civil right amounting to or of the value of Three thousand dollars.
4 (1673) Vaugh. 330, 351; 124 B.R. 1098.
5 R. v. Metropolitan Police Commissioner; Ex parte Parker [1953] 1 W.L.R. 1150.
6 This reasoning is in line with that of Lord Evershed in Ridge v. Baldwin [1964] A.C. 40.
7 In this respect he followed the decision of Pollock B. in Smelting Co. of Australia v. Commissioners of Inland Revenue [1896] 2 Q.B. 179.
8 (1968) 42 A.L.J.R. 64, 67.
9 Ibid. 68.
10 [1924] 1 K.B. 171, 205.
11 [1964] A.C. 40.
12 [1951] A.C. 66.
13 (1968) 42 A.L.J.R. 64, 67.
14 Ibid. 67-68.
15 Ibid. 68.
16 [1967] 2 A.C. 337.
17 Ibid. 349.
18 [1968] V.R. 95, 99.
19 (1968) 42 A.L.J.R. 64, 68.
20 S. 23 Transport Regulation Act 1958-1968 (Vic.).
21 (1968) 42 A.L.J.R. 64, 70, per Barwick C.I.
22 [1958] 1 W.L.R. 434.
23 [1959] A.C. 663, 693. Lord Denning was quoting from Burn's Justice of the Peace (30th ed.) Vol. V, 374.