Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-65tv2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T13:11:25.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cheating, emotions, and rationality: an experiment on tax evasion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Giorgio Coricelli ,
Mateus Joffily ,
Claude Montmarquette  and
Marie Claire Villeval
Giorgio Coricelli*
Affiliation:
CNRS, Centre de neurosciences cognitives, 67, boulevard Pinel, 69675 Bron Cedex, France
Mateus Joffily*
Affiliation:
CNRS, Centre de neurosciences cognitives, 67, boulevard Pinel, 69675 Bron Cedex, France IPUB, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Av. Venceslau Brás, 71, 22290-140 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Claude Montmarquette*
Affiliation:
CIRANO, Université de Montréal, 2020 University Street, Montreal, H3A 2A5 Quebec, Canada
Marie Claire Villeval*
Affiliation:
Université de Lyon, Lyon, 69007, France GATE, CNRS, 93, Chemin de Mouilles Ecully, Ecully Cedex 69130, France IZA, Bonn, Germany CCP, Aarhus, Denmark
*
e-mail: coricelli@isc.cnrs.fr
e-mail: joffily@isc.cnrs.fr
e-mail: Claude.Montmarquette@cirano.qc.ca
e-mail: villeval@gate.cnrs.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The economics-of-crime approach usually ignores the emotional cost and benefit of cheating. In this paper, we investigate the relationships between emotions, deception, and rational decision-making by means of an experiment on tax evasion. Emotions are measured by skin conductance responses and self-reports. We show that the intensity of anticipated and anticipatory emotions before reporting income positively correlates with both the decision to cheat and the proportion of evaded income. The experienced emotional arousal after an audit increases with the monetary sanctions and the arousal is even stronger when the evader's picture is publicly displayed. We also find that the risk of a public exposure of deception deters evasion whereas the amount of fines encourages evasion. These results suggest that an audit policy that strengthens the emotional dimension of cheating favors compliance.

Keywords

DeceptionTax evasionEmotionsPhysiological measuresExperiment

JEL classification

D87: Neuroeconomics C91: Laboratory, Individual Behavior C92: Laboratory, Group Behavior H26: Tax Evasion and Avoidance

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Economics , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 226 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © Economic Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This research was supported by a grant from the Rhône-Alpes Region (CIBLE program).

Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi: 10.1007/s10683-010-9237-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

Allingham, M., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3-4), 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, J. (1991). A perspective on the experimental analysis of taxpayer reporting. The Accounting Review, 66(3), 577–593.Google Scholar
Alm, J., & McKee, M. (2004). Tax compliance as a coordination game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 54(3), 297–312.10.1016/j.jebo.2003.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, J., Jackson, B., & McKee, M. (1992b). Institutional uncertainty and taxpayer compliance. American Economic Review, 82(4), 1018–1026.Google Scholar
Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., & Schulze, W. D. (1992a). Why do people pay taxes? Journal of Public Economics, 48, 21–48.10.1016/0047-2727(92)90040-MCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, J., Cronshaw, M. B., & McKee, M. (1993). Tax compliance with endogenous audit selection rules. Kyklos, 1, 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anders, S., Lotze, M., & Erb, M. (2004). Brain activity underlying emotional valence and arousal: a response-related fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 23, 200–209.10.1002/hbm.20048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andreoni, J., Erard, B., & Feinstein, J. (1998). Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 818860.Google Scholar
Baldry, J. C. (1986). Tax evasion is not a gamble. Economics Letters, 22, 333–335.10.1016/0165-1765(86)90092-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Shakar, G., Bornstein, G., Hopfensitz, A., & van Winden, F. (2007). Reciprocity and emotions in bargaining: using physiological and self-report measures. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 314323.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, M., & Zanardi, A. (2004). Tax evasion, tax rates, and reference dependence. FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, 60(3), 422–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, M., Christian, C., & Slemrod, J. (2001). Do normative appeals affect tax compliance? Evidence from a controlled experiment in Minnesota. National Tax Journal, 54(1), 125–138.10.17310/ntj.2001.1.06CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucsein, W. (1992). Plenum series in behavioral psychology and medicine. Electrodermal activity. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Bradley, M. M. (2000). Emotion and motivation. In Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. G. (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Measuring emotion: behavior, feeling and physiology. In Lane, R. & Nadel, L. (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion, 1, 276–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cason, T. N., & Gangadharan, L. (2006). An experimental study of compliance and leverage in auditing and regulatory enforcement. Economic inquiry, 44(2), 352–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G., & Dufwenberg, M. (2006). Promises and partnership. Econometrica, 74(6), 1579–1601.10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00719.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2003). Portfolio choice and risk attitudes: an experiment. Mimeo.10.2139/ssrn.397300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, J. H., & Plumlee, R. D. (1991). The taxpayer's labor and reporting decision: the effect of audit schemes. The Accounting Review, 66, 559–576.Google Scholar
Cowell, F. (1990). Cheating the government: the economics of evasion. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cummings, R. G., Martinez-Vazquez, J., McKee, M., & Torgler, B. (2009). Tax morale affects tax compliance: evidence from surveys and artefactual field experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 70(3), 447–457.10.1016/j.jebo.2008.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error. New York: Avon.Google ScholarPubMed
Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., & Filion, D. L. (2000). The electrodermal system. In Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. G. (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Quervain, D. J. F., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., Schellhammer, M., Schnyder, U., Buck, A., & Fehr, E. (2004). The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science, 305, 1254–1258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhami, S., & Al-Nowaihi, A. (2007). Why do people pay taxes? Prospect theory versus expected utility theory. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 64(1), 171–192.10.1016/j.jebo.2006.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelberg, R. (1967). Electrical properties of the skin. In Brown, C. C. (Ed.), Methods in psychophysiology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1996). Rationality and the emotions. The Economic Journal, 106(438), 1386–1397.10.2307/2235530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortin, B., Lacroix, G., & Villeval, M. C. (2007). Tax evasion and social interactions. Journal of Public Economics, 91(11-12), 2089–2112.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerschlager, C. (Ed.) (2005). Deception in markets: an economic analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gneezy, U. (2005). Deception: the role of consequences. American Economic Review, 95(1), 384–394.10.1257/0002828053828662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, B. (2004). An online recruitment system for economic experiments. In Kremer, K. & Macho, V. (Eds.), GWDG Bericht: Vol. 63. Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003 (pp. 79–93). Göttingen: Ges. für Wiss. Datenverarbeitung.Google Scholar
Halla, M., & Schneider, F. G. (2009). Taxes and benefits: two distinct options to cheat on the state? Research paper, IZA.10.2139/ssrn.1145915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbaugh, W. T., Mayr, U., & Burghart, D. R. (2007). Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations. Science, 316, 1622–1625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. (1986). Norm theory: comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchler, E. (2007). The economic psychology of tax behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1992). A motivational analysis of emotion: reflex-cortex connections. Psychological Science, 3, 44–49.10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00255.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, G. (2000). Emotions in economic theory and economic behavior. American Economic Review, 90(2), 426–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, G. F., Hsee, C. K., Weber, E. U., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267–286.10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). Approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J. O., & Low, K. (2001). Motor processes in simple, go/no-go, and choice reaction time tasks: a psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27(2), 266–289.Google ScholarPubMed
Myles, G. D., & Naylor, R. A. (1996). A model of tax evasion with group conformity and social customs. European Journal of Political Economy, 12(1), 49–66.10.1016/0176-2680(95)00037-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, A. (2007). Instinctive and cognitive reasoning: a study of response times. Economic Journal, 117(523), 1243–1259.10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02081.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez-Pages, S., & Vorsatz, M. (2007). An experimental study of truth-telling in sender-receiver game. Games and Economic Behavior, 61(1), 86–112.10.1016/j.geb.2006.10.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seiter, J. S., & Bruschke, J. (2007). Deception and emotion: the effects of motivation, relationship type, and sex on expected feelings of guilt and shame following acts of deception in United States and Chinese samples. Communication Studies, 58(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slemrod, J. (1998). On voluntary compliance, voluntary taxes, and social capital. National Tax Journal, Li, 485–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slemrod, J. (2007). Cheating ourselves: the economics of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 25–48.10.1257/jep.21.1.25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spicer, M. W., & Thomas, J. E. (1982). Audit probabilities and the tax evasion decision: an experimental approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2, 241–245.10.1016/0167-4870(82)90006-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgler, B. (2007). Tax compliance and tax morale. A theoretical and empirical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781847207203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Winden, F., Krawczyk, M., & Hopfensitz, A. (2008). Investment, resolution of risk, and the role of affect. Amsterdam, CREED Working Paper.Google Scholar
Wild, B. (2003). Are emotions contagious? Evoked emotions while viewing emotionally expressive faces: quality, quantity, time course and gender differences. Psychiatry Research, 102(2), 109–124.10.1016/S0165-1781(01)00225-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yitzhaki, S. (1974). A note on ‘income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis’. Journal of Public Economics, 3(2), 201–202.10.1016/0047-2727(74)90037-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. (1984). The primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39(2), 117–123.10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeiliger, R. (2000). A presentation of regate. Internet-based software for experimental economics. http://www.gate.cnrs.fr/~zeiliger/regate/RegateIntro.ppt. Lyon: GATE.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Coricelli et al. supplementary material

Supplementary Material to “Cheating, Emotions, and Rationality: An Experiment on Tax Evasion”. Instructions of the experiment
Download Coricelli et al. supplementary material(File)
File 46.1 KB