Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-8d8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-16T16:32:18.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are women expected to be more generous?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Fernando Aguiar ,
Pablo Brañas-Garza ,
Ramón Cobo-Reyes ,
Natalia Jimenez  and
Luis M. Miller
Fernando Aguiar*
Affiliation:
IESA-CSIC, Campo Santo de los Mártires 7, 14004, Córdoba, Spain
Pablo Brañas-Garza*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Teoría Económica, Universidad de Granada, Campus de la Cartuja, 18011, Granada, Spain
Ramón Cobo-Reyes*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Teoría Económica, Universidad de Granada, Campus de la Cartuja, 18011, Granada, Spain
Natalia Jimenez*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Teoría Económica, Universidad de Granada, Campus de la Cartuja, 18011, Granada, Spain
Luis M. Miller*
Affiliation:
IESA-CSIC and Strategic Interaction Group, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Kahlaische Str. 10, 07745, Jena, Germany
*
e-mail: faguiar@iesa.csic.es
e-mail: pbg@ugr.es
e-mail: ramonc@ugr.es
e-mail: natjj@ugr.es
e-mail: miller@econ.mpg.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper analyzes if men and women are expected to behave differently regarding altruism. Since the dictator game provides the most suitable design for studying altruism and generosity in the lab setting, we use a modified version to study the beliefs involved in the game. Our results are substantial: men and women are expected to behave differently. Moreover, while women believe that women are more generous, men consider that women are as generous as men.

Keywords

Dictator gameBeliefsExpectationsGenerosityGender

JEL classification

D64: Altruism • Philanthropy • Intergenerational Transfers C91: Laboratory, Individual Behavior J16: Economics of Gender • Non-labor Discrimination

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Economics , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 93 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Economic Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

We appreciate comments from Josemari Aizpurua, Shoshana Neuman and participants in seminars at Bar-Ilan University, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Univ. Publica Navarra. Tim Cason and one anonymous referee made substantial comments on the previous draft. Financial support from CICYT (SEJ2007-62081/ECON and SEJ2006-00959/SOCI) and FCEA (SOC2.05/43) is gratefully acknowledge. Martha Gaustad revised the English grammar.

Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-008-9199-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

Brañas-Garza, P. (2007). Promoting helping behavior with framing in dictator games. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(4), 477–486.10.1016/j.joep.2006.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchan, N., Croson, R. A., & Solnick, S. (2004). Trust and gender: an examination of behavior, biases and beliefs in the investment game (Working Paper). University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Cooper, D. J., Kagel, J. H., Lo, W., & Gu, Q. L. (1999). Gaming against managers in incentive systems: experimental results with Chinese students and Chinese managers. American Economic Review, 89, 781–804.10.1257/aer.89.4.781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J., & Deck, C. (2006). When are women more generous than men? Economic inquiry, 44(6), 587598.Google Scholar
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2006). Gender differences in preferences. The Wharton School, Mimeo.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50, 145–158.10.1037/0003-066X.50.3.145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. J. (1998). Are women less selfish than men?: evidence from dictator experiments. The Economic Journal, 108, 726–735.10.1111/1468-0297.00311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (2002). Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(4), 281–295.10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00097-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. J. (forthcoming). Men, women and risk aversion: experimental evidence. In: Plott, C. & Smith, V. (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economic results. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Falk, A., & Fehr, E. (2003). Why labour market experiments? Labour Economics, 10, 399–406.10.1016/S0927-5371(03)00050-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., & List, J. (2003). The hidden costs and returns of incentives-trust and trustworthiness among CEOs (WP 134). Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich.Google Scholar
Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., & Rustichini, A. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: gender differences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 1050–1074.10.1162/00335530360698496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2004). Gender and competition at a young age. American Economic Review, 94(2), 377–381.10.1257/0002828041301821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, D., & Rubery, J. (2001). The gender pay gap: a research review. Research discussion series. Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.Google Scholar
Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067–1101.10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slonim, R., & Garbarino, E. (Forthcoming). Increases in trust and altruism from partner selection: experimental evidence. Experimental Economics.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Aguiar et al. supplementary material

Aguiar et al. supplementary material
Download Aguiar et al. supplementary material(File)
File 56.7 KB