Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zklqj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T21:48:47.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Method in Experiment: Rhetoric and Reality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Vernon L. Smith
Vernon L. Smith*
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics and Law, Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science, George Mason University, Truland Building 400-J, 3330 Washington blvd, Arlington Virginia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The methodological ideal of experimentalists, E, is easily stated: derive a testable hypothesis, H, from a well-specified theory, T; implement experiments with a design; implicitly in the latter are auxiliary hypotheses, A, that surface in the review/discussion of completed research reports (payoffs are ‘adequate,’ Ss are ‘relevant,’ instructions, context are ‘clear,’ etc.). We want to be able to conclude, if statistical test outcomes support not-H, that T is ‘falsified.’ But this is not what we do; rather we ask if there is a flaw in the test, i.e. not-A is supported, and we do more experiments. This is good practice—much better than the statistical rhetoric of falsificationism. Undesigned social processes allow E to accumulate technical and instrumental knowledge that drive the reduction of experimental error and constitute a more coherent methodology than falsificationism.

Keywords

experimental economicssciencemethodology

JEL classification

B4: Economic Methodology C90: General

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Economics , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , October 2002 , pp. 91 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 Economic Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Angel, R. (2001). “Future Optical and Infrared Telescopes.” Nature Insights. 409, 427–430.Google ScholarPubMed
Banks, J., Olson, M., Porter, D., Rassenti, S., and Smith, V. (2002). “Theory, Experiment and the FCC Spectrum Auctions.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization.Google Scholar
Burnham, T., McCabe, K., and Smith, V. (2000). “Friend-or-Foe Intentionality Priming In An Extensive Form Trust Game.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 93(1), 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C.F. and Hogarth, R.M. (1999). “The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 19, 7–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J.C. and Oaxaca, R. (1990). “Using Laboratory Market Experiments to Evaluate Econometric Estimators of Structural Models.” Working Paper, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Cox, J.C. and Oaxaca, R. (1999). “Can Supply and Demand Parameters be Recovered from Data Generated by Market Institutions?” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics.10.1080/07350015.1999.10524818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. and Holt, C. (1993). Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. and Williams, A. (1991). “The Hayek Hypothesis in Experimental Auctions.” Economic Inquiry. 29, 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, C. and Grossman, P. (2000). “Volunteers and Pseudo-Volunteers; The Effect of Recruitment Method in Dictator Experiments.” Experimental Economics. 2, 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A. (2000). “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies.” English Translation by Beck, Anna, in The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. Vol. 2, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (2000). “On the Relativity Principle and the Conclusions Drawn From It.” English Translation by Beck, Anna, in The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. Vol. 2, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 252–311.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1934). The World As I See It. Covici Friede Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. and Falk, A. (1999). “Wage Rigidity in a Competitive Incomplete Contract Market.” Journal of Political Economy. 107, 106–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fölsing, A. (1997). Albert Einstein. Viking, New York.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1953). Essays in Positive Economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Friedman, D. (1984). “On the Efficiency of Experimental Double Auction Markets.” American Economic Review. 74, 60–72.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (1991). “From Tools to Theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology.” Psychological Review. 98, 254–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, N.R. (1969). Perception and Discovery. Freeman, Cooper and Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A. (1945). “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review. 35, 519–530.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A. (2000). Competition as a Discovery Procedure. Reprinted in Chapter 13, The Essence of Hayek. Hoover Institution Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
Hertwig, R. and Ortmann, A. (2001). “Experimental Practices in Economics.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 24, 383–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., and Smith, V. (1994). “Preferences, Property Rights and Anonymity in Bargaining Games.” Games and Economic Behavior. 7, 346–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., and Smith, V. (2000). “The Impact of Exchange Context on the Activation of Equity in Ultimatum Games.” Experimental Economics. 3, 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, C., Langan, L., and Villamil, A. (1986). “Market Power in Oral Double Auctions.” Economic Inquiry. 24, 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, C. and Laury, S. (2001). “Varying the Scale of Financial Incentives Under Real and Hypothetical Conditions.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 24, 417–418.10.1017/S0140525X01384145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagel, J. and Roth, A. (1995). Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton.10.1515/9780691213255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmers. Vol. 1/2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511621123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, D. (1996). Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, K. and Smith, V. (2000). “A Comparison of Naïve and Sophisticated Subject Behavior with Game Theoretic Prediction.” Proceedings National Academy of Sciences. 97, 3777–3781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, K., Rassenti, S., and Smith, V. (1989). “Designing Smart Computer Assisted Markets for Gas Networks.” European Journal of Political Economy. 5, 259–283.10.1016/0176-2680(89)90049-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, K., Rassenti, S., and Smith, V. (1998). “Reciprocity, Trust and Payoff Privacy in Extensive Form Bargaining.” Games and Economic Behavior. 24, 10–24.10.1006/game.1998.0638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, K., Houser, D., Ryan, L., Smith, V., and Trouard, R. (2001). “A Functional Imaging Study of Cooperation in Two-Person Reciprocal Exchange.” Cognition and Neuroimaging Laboratories, University of Arizona, Tucson.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., and Kahneman, D. (2001). “Do Frequency Representations Eliminate Conjunction Effects?” American Psychological Society. 12, 264–275.Google ScholarPubMed
Nash, J.F. (1950). “The Bargaining Problem.” Econometrica. 18, 315–335.10.2307/1907266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northrup, F.S.C. (1969). “Einstein's Conception of Science.” In Schilpp, P.A. (ed.), Albert Einstein Philosopher-Scientist. LaSalle, IL. Open Court.Google Scholar
Pirsig, R.M. (1981). Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. Banton Books, New York.Google Scholar
Rassenti, S. (1981). “O-1 Decision Problems with Multiple Resource Constrains: Algorithms and Applications.” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Rassenti, S., Smith, V., and Bulfin, R. (1982). “A Combinatorial Auction Mechanism for Airport Time Slot Allocation.” Bell Journal of Economics, Autumn.10.2307/3003463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rassenti, S. and Smith, V. (1986). “Electric Utility Deregulation.” In Pricing Electric Gas and Telecommunication Services The Institute for the Study of Regulation, December.Google Scholar
Rassenti, S., Smith, V., and Wilson, B. (2001). “Controlling Market Power and Price Spikes in Electricity Networks.” Available at www.ices-gmu.orgGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. (1979). “What Are The Questions?” Journal of Economic Literature. 15, 1318–1339.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. and Nordhaus, W. (1985). Economics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google ScholarPubMed
Segre, E. (1984). From Falling Bodies to Radio Waves. W.H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
Shubik, M. (1959). Strategy and Market Structure. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Simon, J. (1993). Population Matters. Transaction Publishers, London.Google Scholar
Smith, V.L. (1980). “Relevance of Laboratory Experiments to Testing Resource Allocation Theory.” In Kmenta, J. and Ramsey, J. (eds.), Evaluation of Econometric Models. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Smith, V.L. (1991). Papers in Experimental Economics (Collected works). Cambridge University Press, NewYork.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V.L. (2000). Bargaining and Market Behavior. Essays in Experimental Economics (Collected works). Cambridge University Press, New York.10.1017/CBO9780511528347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V., McCabe, K., and Rassenti, S. (1991). “Lakatos and Experimental Economics.” In Marchi, N. de and Blaug, M. (eds.), Appraising Economic Theories. Edward Elgar, London.Google Scholar
Smith, V. and Szidarovzsky, F. (2001). “Monetary Rewards and Decision Cost in Strategic Interactions.” Papers in Honor of Herb Simon. Herb Simon Memorial Volume by MIT Press.Google Scholar
Smith, V. and Walker, J. (1993a). “Monetary Rewards and Decision Cost in Experimental Economics.” Economic Inquiry. Vol. 31, April, 245-261. Western Economic Association, Best Article Award, 1993.Google Scholar
Smith, V. and Walker, J. (1993b). “Rewards, Experience and Decision Costs in First Price Auctions.” Economic Inquiry. Vol. 31, April, 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soberg, M. (2000). “The Duhem-Quine Thesis and Experimental Economics.” Research Department Paper, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. (1957). “Perfect Competition, Historically Contemplated. Journal of Political Economy. 65, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppes, P. (1969). “Models of Data.” In Studies in the Methodology and Foundations of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-017-3173-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Boening, M. and Wilcox, N. (1996). “Avoidable Cost: Ride a Double Roller Coaster.” American Economic Review. 86, 461–477.Google Scholar
Williams, A. (1980). “Computerized Double-Auction Markets: Some Initial Experimental Results.” Journal of Business. 53, 235–257.10.1086/296084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. (1987). “On Equilibria in Bid-Ask Markets.” In Feiwel, G. (ed.), Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory. MacMillan, Houndmills, UK.Google Scholar