Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T08:00:47.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weather, Physiology and Seasonality of Tea (Camellia sinensis) Yields in Malawi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

G. R. Squire
G. R. Squire
Affiliation:
Tea Research Foundation of Central Africa, Mulanje, Malawi, and Department of Physiology and Environmental Studies, University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Field measurements with a pressure chamber showed that the water potential of tea shoots was more closely related to the atmospheric saturation deficit than to the amount of water in the soil. Records for shoot growth and weather then revealed that, within a narrow range of mean temperature, the weekly rate of shoot extension was inversely related to mean saturation deficit measured at 1400 h. During periods when saturation deficit did not rise above 20 mbar, the rate of shoot extension varied linearly with mean temperature above a base temperature of 12.5–13.0°C. These correlations suggested that seasonality of shoot growth in tea can be explained largely by the independent effects of temperature and humidity. The effect of mean air temperature on the rate of shoot extension was confirmed in a glasshouse built over an established crop.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , October 1979 , pp. 321 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Barua, D. N. (1969). Nature, London 224, 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, M. K. V. (1970). In The Physiology of Tree crops. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Carr, M. K. V. & Dale, M. O. (1979). Unpublished report.Google Scholar
Eden, T. (1965). Tea (2nd edn.). London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. T. (1971). In Water and the Tea Plant. Tea Res. Inst. E. Africa, Kericho, Kenya.Google Scholar
Fordham, R. (1970). PhD thesis, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Fordham, R. & Palmer-Jones, R. W. (1977). Expl Agric. 13, 33.Google Scholar
Green, R. M. (1971). MSc thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Herd, E. M. (1975). A. Rep. Tea Res. Found. of Central Africa for 1974/75, 55.Google Scholar
Herd, E. M. & Squire, G. R. (1976). J. hort. Sci. 51, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laycock, D. H. (1969). Proc. 24th Tocklai Conference. Tocklai Experiment Station, Jorhat, Assam, India.Google Scholar
Nakayana, A., Kano, T. & Sanai, H, (1966). Study of Tea 32, 1 (Japanese).Google Scholar
Squire, G. R. (1977). J. appl. Ecol. 14, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, G. R. (1978). Expl Agric. 14, 7.Google Scholar
Tanton, T. W. (1979). Expl Agric. 15, 187.Google Scholar
Williams, E. N. D. (1971). In Water and the Tea Plant. Tea Res. Inst. E. Africa, Kericho, Kenya.Google Scholar