Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-lr6j9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-29T23:21:45.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Boron Nutrition on Intensity of Red Spider Mite Attack on Oil Palm Seedlings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

J. A. Rajaratnam  and
Law Ing Hock
J. A. Rajaratnam
Affiliation:
Chemara Research Station, Seremban, Malaysia
Law Ing Hock
Affiliation:
Chemara Research Station, Seremban, Malaysia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of boron nutrition on the susceptibility of young tenera oil palm seedlings to red spider mite attack was studied. Highest concentrations of mites were recorded in seedlings which had received little or no boron in the growing media. Injuries by mites were greatest when the leaves had the highest number of mites per unit area, the lowest boron concentration and the lowest concentration of cyanidin.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , January 1975 , pp. 59 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Antonova, G. G. (1969). Cited in Hort. Abs. (1971), 41, 472.Google Scholar
Byrde, R. J. W., Fielding, A. H. & Williams, A. H. (1960). In Phenolics in Plants in Health and Disease (ed. Pridham, J. B.). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Cole, J. S. (1956). Ann. Bot. 20, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, R. W. G. & O'Brien, D. G. (1938). Phytopathology 28, 22.Google Scholar
Farkas, G. L. & Kiraly, Z. (1962). Phytopathol. Z. 44, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeny, P. P. (1969). Phytochemistry 8, 2119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartel, W. (1971). Cited in Hort. Abs. (1971) 41, 114.Google Scholar
Hatcher, J. T. & Wilcox, L. V. (1950). Analyt. Chem. 22, 567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heggenes, H. G. (1942). Plant Physiol. 17, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkham, D. S. (1957). J. gen. Microbiol. 17, 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcallan, J. W. & Adams, J. B. (1961). Can. J. Zool. 39, 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, P. W. (1968). Ann. Rev. Phytograph. 6, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajaratnam, J. W. (1972a). Mal. Agric. Res. 1, 60.Google Scholar
Rajaratnam, J. A. (1972b). Expl Agric. 8, 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajaratnam, J. A. & Lowry, J. B. (1974). Ann. Bot. 38, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajaratnam, J. A., Lowry, J. B. & Law Ing, Hock (1974). Pl. Soil, 40, 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, A. (1952). In Biochemistry of Phenolic Compounds. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tomiyama, K. (1963). A. Rev. Phytopath. 1, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, J. C. & Link, K. P. (1935). Bot. Gaz. 96, 468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yardwood, C. E. (1938). Phytopathology 28, 22.Google Scholar