Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-42vt5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-21T17:14:18.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Results from a Trial of Upper Amazon Cocoa Clones in Ghana*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

G. Lockwood
G. Lockwood
Affiliation:
Cocoa Research Institute, (C.S.I.R.), P.O. Box 8, Tafo, Ghana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Yields in a trial of Upper Amazon clones, derived from high yielding Upper Amazon selections, were low in the early years. One Upper Amazon clone was significantly higher yielding than any other clone, but generally yields from the Upper Amazons were comparable to those of Local Trinitario selections included as controls. The Upper Amazon clones were highly variable in establishment, yield and losses from diseases. The relationship between the performance of some of the clones and their parent seedlings is discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , October 1971 , pp. 321 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Anon. (1938). Proc. Third West African Agr. Conf., 1938, 77, as quoted by Posnette (1943).Google Scholar
Anon. (1970). The C.R.I.G. Series II Hybrids. Mimeo, C.R.I.G., Tafo, Ghana.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, E. E. N. A. (1964). Rep. Cocoa Res. Inst., Ghana, 1962-1963, 36.Google Scholar
Glendinning, D. R. (1961). Ghana J. Sci. 1, 38.Google Scholar
Glendinning, D. R. (1963). Ghana J. Sci. 3, III.Google Scholar
Glendinning, D. R. (1964). Hort. Res. 4, 89.Google Scholar
Glendinning, D. R. (1966). Rep. Cocoa Res. Inst., Ghana, 1963-1965, 75.Google Scholar
Glendinning, D. R. & Edwards, D. F. (1962). Proc. Cocoa Conf., London, 1961, 137.Google Scholar
Glendinning, D. R. & Vernon, A. J. (1965). J. hort. Sci. 40, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, P. S. (1955). Proc. Cocoa Conf. London, 1955, 79.Google Scholar
Hammond, P. S. (1958). Proc. Cocoa Conf. London, 1957, 44.Google Scholar
Knight, R. & Rogers, H. H. (1955). Emp. J. expl Agric. 23, 113.Google Scholar
Legg, J. T. & Kenten, R. H. (1968). Trop. Agric., Trin. 45, 61.Google Scholar
Lockwood, G. (1971a). J. hort. Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
Lookwood, G. (1971b). (In preparation). Rep. Cocoa Res. Inst., Ghana, 1969-1970.Google Scholar
Posnette, A. F. (1943). Trop. Agric. Trin. 20, 149.Google Scholar
Posnette, A. F. (1945). Trop. Agric. Trin. 22, 184.Google Scholar
Posnette, A. F. (1951). Emp. J. expl Agric. 19, 242.Google Scholar
Rogers, H. H. & Knight, R. (1956). Ann. Rep. W. Afr. Cocoa Res. Inst. 954–55, 79.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. (1949). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 39, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toxopeus, H. (1968). Euphytica, 17, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar