Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-gwv8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-12T07:11:30.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Controlled Environments as an Adjunct to Field Research on Lentils (Lens culinaris). II. Research Strategy†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

R. J. Summerfield  and
F. J. Muehlbauer
R. J. Summerfield
Affiliation:
USDA-SEA-AR, Legume Breeding and Production, 215 Johnson Hall, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
F. J. Muehlbauer
Affiliation:
USDA-SEA-AR, Legume Breeding and Production, 215 Johnson Hall, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The strategy and associated practical details are described of a research programme which seeks to make effective use of controlled environment facilities in providing information and screening techniques useful to lentil breeders. Two principal objectives were (a) that genotypes grown in artificial climates should respond to whatever factors are being investigated in a manner which reflects their responses and relative sensitivity to different agroclimates in the field, and (b) to deploy controlled environment facilities for the longest period which is feasible during each calendar year and with maximum benefit:cost ratio.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 1982 , pp. 3 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Association of Official Seed Analysts (1978). Rules for testing seeds. Journal of Seed Technology 3:1–125.Google Scholar
Austin, R. B. (1972). Effects of environment before harvesting on viability. In Viability of Seeds (Ed. Roberts, E. H.) 114–149. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elston, J. (1981). Climate. In Potential Productivity of Field Crops under Different Environments (Ed. Smith, W. H. & Yoshida, S.). The Philippines: IRRI (in press).Google Scholar
Francis, C. A. (1972). Natural daylengths for photoperiod sensitive plants. Tech. Bulletin 2, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), pp. 32. Cali, Colombia: CIAT.Google Scholar
Gibson, A. H. (1980). Host determinants in nodulation and nitrogen fixation. In Advances in Legume Science (Ed. Summerfield, R. J. & Bunting, A. H.), 69–75. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Heydecker, W. (1972). Vigour. In Viability of Seeds (Ed. Roberts, E. H.), 209–252. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, J. P. (1977). Plants and weather. In Environmental Effects on Crop Physiology (Ed. Landsberg, J. J. & Cutting, C. V.), 1–20. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Huxley, P. A. & Summerfield, R. J. (1976). Photomorphogenetic effects of lamp type on growth of some species of tropical grain legumes in controlled environment cabinets. Plant Science Letters 6:25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minchin, F. R., Huxley, P. A. & Summerfield, R. J. (1976). Effect of root temperature on growth and seed yield in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Experimental Agriculture 12:279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muehlbauer, F. J. (1973). Seeding Rates for Tekoa Lentils. Washington Agricultural Experiment Station Circular 565, 3.Google Scholar
Papendick, R. I. & Miller, D. E. (1977). Conservation tillage in the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 32:49–56.Google Scholar
Roberts, E. H. & Ellis, R. H. (1980). Seed physiology and seed quality in soyabean. In Advances in Legume Science (Ed. Summerfield, R. J. & Bunting, A. H.), 297–312. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Roberts, E. H., Summerfield, R. J., Minchin, F. R. & Hadley, P. (1979). The Plant Environment Laboratory, Reading, UK. Rhizobium Newsletter 24:153–155.Google Scholar
Spomer, L. A. (1980). Guidelines for measuring and reporting environmental factors in controlled environment facilities. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis 11:1203–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerfield, R. J. (1980). The contribution of physiology to breeding for increased yields in grain legume crops. In Opportunities for Increasing Crop Yield (Ed. Hurd, R. G.Biscoe, P. V. & Dennis, C.), 51–69. London: Pitmans.Google Scholar
Summerfield, R. J. (1981). Environmental adaptation. In Lentils (Ed. Webb, C. & Hawtin, G.), 91–110. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Summerfield, R. J., Cockshull, K. E., Dickinson, D. & Richardson, A. C. (1974). Versatile irrigation systems for controlled environment growth chambers. Journal of Horticultural Science 49:161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerfield, R. J., Huxley, P. A. & Minchin, F. R. (1977). Plant husbandry and management techniques for growing grain legumes under simulated tropical conditions in controlled environments. Experimental Agriculture 13:81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerfield, R. J., Minchin, F. R., Roberts, E. H. & Hadley, P. (1981). Cowpeas. In Potential Productivity of Field Crops under Different Environments (Eds Smith, W. H. & Yoshida, S.). The Philippines: IRRI (in press).Google Scholar
Summerfield, R. J. & Muehlbauer, F. J. (1981). Controlled environments as an adjunct to field research on lentils (Lens culinaris). I. Perspective, tenets and objectives. Experimental Agriculture 17:363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerfield, R. J. & Wien, H. C. (1980). Effects of photoperiod and air temperature on growth and yield of economic legumes. In Advances in Legume Science (Ed. Summerfield, R. J. & Bunting, A. H.), 17–35. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. W. & Hume, D. J. (1976). The use of growth chambers in soybean research. In World Soybean Research (Ed. Hill, L. D.), 342–351. Illinois: Interstate Press.Google Scholar
Wright, S. T. C. (1972). Physiological and biochemical responses to wilting and other stress conditions. In Crop Processes in Controlled Environments (Ed. Rees, A. R.Cockshull, K. E.Hand, D. W.Hurd, R. G.), 349–361. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar