Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-t28k2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-19T14:02:53.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Pre-sowing High Temperature Stress on Seedling Emergence and Yield of Seed Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

Riaz A. Khan ,
S. Ahmad  and
S. Hussain
Riaz A. Khan
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, West Pakistan Agricultural University, Lyallpur
S. Ahmad
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, West Pakistan Agricultural University, Lyallpur
S. Hussain
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, West Pakistan Agricultural University, Lyallpur
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The seed of American Cotton, Var. 134, was stressed at 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90°C for 24 or 48 hours before seeding. Stresses at 50 to 70°C had a stimulatory effect on seedling emergence and subsequent performance of the cotton plants, but higher temperatures caused thermal injury or killed the seed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 1973 , pp. 9 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Christidis, B. G. & Harrison, G. J. (1955). Cotton Growing Problems. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gill, M. S. (1960). Fifty Years of Agriculture Education and Research. Rep. Dep. Agric. W. Pak.Google Scholar
Griffith, W. L. & Harrison, C. M. (1954). Agron. J. 61, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, P. R. & Jesus, J. de Jr (1964). Crop Sci. 4, 530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kappelman, A. J. Jr & Buchanan, G. A. (1968). Agron. J. 60, 660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, R. A. & Laude, H. M. (1968). Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 2, 110.Google Scholar
Khan, R. A. & Laude, H. M. (1969). Crop Sci. 9, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kydrev, T. G. & Kolev, V. M. (1962). AIBS Translation Soviet. Pl. Physiol. 8, 460.Google Scholar
Levit, J. (1951). A. Rev. Pl. Physiol. 2, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastovsky, J. & Karel, V. (1961). J. Inst. Brew. 68, 280.Google Scholar
Quinlivan, B. J. (1961). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 12, 1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schonfeld, J. (1960). J. Inst. Brew. 67, 201.Google Scholar
Schroeder, C. A. (1963). Nature 200, 1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S. M. (1950). Bot. Gaz. 112, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summer, R. O. & Cobb, R. D. (1967). Agron. J. 59, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahhab, A. (1965). Fertilizer Trials in the Farmer's Fields. Dep. of Agric. Govt. Pak.Google Scholar
Wellington, P. S. & Bradnock, W. T. (1964). J. Natl. Inst. Bot. 10, 129.Google Scholar