Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-xh45t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-21T04:55:56.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of Naltrexone Plus Bupropion in Eating Behavior Adjustment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

D. F. Holanda*
Affiliation:
Medicine, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil
M. G. Ruelas
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima, Peru
F. R. de Lima
Affiliation:
Independent practice, São Paulo
G. H. S. da Silva
Affiliation:
Medicine, Catholic University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
C. M. C. G. Q. Campos
Affiliation:
Medicine, Catholic University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
B. S. Pinto
Affiliation:
Medicine, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Binge-eating disorder (BED) is a significant global health challenge associated with obesity and psychological issues. The combination of Naltrexone-Bupropion (NB) has emerged as a promising pharmacological approach for managing eating behaviors.

Objectives

This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Naltrexone-Bupropion compared to placebo in managing eating behaviors, focusing on weight loss, binge-eating frequency, eating disorder psychopathology, quality of life, and adverse effects.

Methods

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing NB versus placebo for BED. Primary endpoints were weight loss and binge-eating frequency. Secondary endpoints included eating disorder psychopathology, depression, quality of life, food cravings, and adverse effects.The mean differences (MD) were applied with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) for continuous outcomes, using a random-effects model. We used RevMan 5.4.1 for statistical analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic.

Results

Five RCTs with 2,466 adult participants (mean age 46.5 years, BMI 21.5-50 kg/m²) were included. NB was associated with a statistically significant reduction in weight loss percentage compared to placebo (MD -3.67%, 95% CI [-4.30; -3.03], I²=98%; Figure 1). However, no significant differences were found between NB and placebo in reducing binge-eating episodes(SMD 0.02, 95% CI [-0.30; 0.34], I2 =0%, Figure 2) , improving eating disorder psychopathology, alleviating depression, or decreasing food cravings. Although NB showed some benefits in improving the quality of life, the results were not statistically significant. NB was associated with a higher risk of adverse effects, including nausea, headache, constipation, dizziness, vomiting, insomnia, and dry mouth. The certainty of the evidences is in the Summary of findings (SOF) of GRADE evaluation (Figure 3). After leave-one-out sensitivity analysis, no single study was found to influence the effect estimate or drive heterogeneity excessively.

Image 1:

Image 2:

Image 3:

Conclusions

NB demonstrated efficacy for weight loss in individuals with eating behavior issues but showed no significant benefits for core eating disorder symptoms. The higher risk of adverse effects necessitates careful consideration in clinical decision-making. Further research is needed to determine optimal patient populations, treatment duration, and strategies to mitigate adverse effects.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.