Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-nbs69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-23T10:49:16.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neurocognitive predictors of progression from late-life depression to all-cause dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

M. Bocharova*
Affiliation:
Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience
R. Desai
Affiliation:
ADAPT lab, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London
A. John
Affiliation:
ADAPT lab, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London
G. Charlesworth
Affiliation:
ADAPT lab, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London
J. Stott
Affiliation:
ADAPT lab, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London
A. Young
Affiliation:
Centre for Affective Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom
D. Aarsland
Affiliation:
Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Late-life depression (LLD) is consistently linked with higher risk of subsequent dementia (Livingston G et al. Lancet 2024; 404: 572-628); however, predictors of progression from LLD to dementia are yet to be identified.

Objectives

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we focus specifically on cognitive phenotypes of LLD as predictors of progression to dementia. This review aims to summarize findings from longitudinal studies exploring which cognitive domains affected by LLD are more likely to predict progression to all-cause dementia and Alzheimer’s Disease.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO were searched for relevant studies published by April 18th, 2024. Study search and selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed by two reviewers separately, in accordance with the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines (Page MJ et al. BMJ 2021; 372). Effect sizes for performance on neurocognitive tests were extracted and pooled separately for all-cause dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) outcomes.

Results

Six studies were selected for inclusion (See Fig. 1 for PRISMA flowchart). Conversion from LLD to all-cause dementia was strongly predicted by worse performance on delayed recall (SMD 0.84 [0.64 – 1.05]), immediate recall (SMD 1.02 [0.63 – 1.41]), attention/working memory (SMD 1.17[0.82 – 1.52]), processing speed (SMD 1.23 [0.37 – 2.10]), delayed recognition (SMD 1.30 [0.59 – 2.01]) and orientation (SMD 1.13 [0.90 – 1.36]); and moderately by verbal fluency (SMD 0.70 [0.50 – 0.91]), naming (SMD 0.54 [0.16 – 0.93]), and construction (SMD 0.67 [0.37 – 0.98]), but not intelligence (see Fig. 2). For AD, strong effects were observed for deficits in delayed recall (SMD 1.30 [0.59 – 2.01]), immediate recall (SMD 1.26 [0.74-1.79]), and orientation (SMD 1.64 [0.67 – 2.62]), and small to moderate for verbal fluency (SMD 0.47 [0.06 – 0.87]) and processing speed (0.66 [0.26 – 1.07]); attention or naming were not significant predictors (See Fig. 3).

Image 1:

Image 2:

Image 3:

Conclusions

There appear to be significant neurocognitive differences across a wide range of domains within an episode of LLD between those who convert to dementia and those who do not. Future studies should aim to establish a neurocognitive profile of LLD associated with risk of conversion to specific subtypes of dementia.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.