Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9b74x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-31T01:09:57.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Linguistic Fingerprints in Aphasia: Exploring Speech Patterns Through LLM-Based Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

E. Gutierrez
Affiliation:
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid - NEBULA group, Madrid, Spain MIT LinQ - Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
C. Quesada
Affiliation:
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid - NEBULA group, Madrid, Spain
M. Navas
Affiliation:
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid - NEBULA group, Madrid, Spain
P. Cano*
Affiliation:
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Aphasia, a language disorder resulting from brain damage, presents significant challenges in assessment and treatment. Traditional evaluation methods often lack precision and efficiency. This study introduces a novel framework for feature extraction in aphasia speech data, leveraging the power of state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance assessment, classification, and treatment planning. We used the AphasiaBank database (https://aphasia.talkbank.org/) to test our methods.

Objectives

Our primary objectives were to:

  1. 1. Develop a comprehensive set of LLM-based feature extractors for aphasia speech analysis.

  2. 2. Evaluate the effectiveness of these features in assessing aphasia types and severity.

  3. 3. Explore the potential of AI-assisted speech analysis in clinical settings for aphasia management.

Methods

We developed a novel framework focusing on content analysis of transcribed aphasia speech. Our approach utilizes the embedded knowledge of language usage in LLMs to evaluate speech disfluencies. The advanced set of features derived from LLMs includes, but is not limited to: 1) Lemma similarities for vocabulary diversity assessment, 2) Syntactic structure analysis, 3) Use of linkers and connectors, 4) Degree of abstraction in word usage, 5) CEFR framework-based word complexity analysis, 6) Maze type identification, 7) Semantic field variability, 8) False start analysis.

This content-focused feature set is designed to complement existing phonetic features derived from audio files and other potential data sources, such as MRI.

Results

Our evaluation demonstrates that current SOTA LLMs show significant potential in aphasia assessment and group differentiation. The novel feature set provides detailed insights into various aspects of language use affected by aphasia, offering a more comprehensive evaluation than traditional methods.

Image 1:

Conclusions

This study presents an advancement in applying AI to aphasia assessment and treatment. Our novel LLM-based framework offers a more nuanced and efficient approach to analyzing aphasia speech, potentially leading to more accurate diagnoses and personalized treatment plans. The findings lay the groundwork for integrating AI-assisted tools into clinical workflows, complementing rather than replacing human expertise. Future research could explore combining this framework with immersive technologies for enhanced language rehabilitation. This work contributes to a future where AI augments the quality and accessibility of care for individuals with aphasia, while maintaining the central role of human clinicians in the therapeutic process.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.