Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-r5d9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-10T20:05:30.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

fNIRS and behavioral measures of inhibition are correlated with different aspects of impulsivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

A. D. S. Afonso Junior
Affiliation:
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, São Paulo
W. Machado-Pinheiro
Affiliation:
Univeridade Federal Fluminense, Rio das Ostras, Brazil
A. G. Seabra
Affiliation:
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, São Paulo
M. A. Munoz
Affiliation:
Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
L. R. R. Carreiro*
Affiliation:
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, São Paulo
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Impulsivity implies difficulties in control, leading to non-premeditated actions, and troubles resisting distraction and remaining focused on a goal. It is a transdiagnostic construct that is associated with several disorders, including Attentional Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Borderline Personality Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). It is possible to divide impulsivity between impulsive actions, associated with the ability to inhibit actions, and choice impulsivity, that involves decision-making. It is also common to differentiate between trait impulsivity, that involves more stable characteristics, and state impulsivity, in which the impulsive behavior is more transient.

Objectives

To investigate the association between action impulsivity as a trait (using self-report measures) and as state (using different level of analysis in a computerized task, i.e., behavioral and neuroimaging measures).

Methods

52 university students (mean age = 21.4; standard deviation = 3.33) filled the BIS-11 self-report questionnaires and completed a Stroop-matching/stop-signal task while they had their behavioral and hemodynamic brain activity collected using Functional Near- Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS). The Stroop-matching/stop-signal task had three conditions varying the inhibitory demands: Congruent/Unrelated; Incongruent/Unrelated and Incongruent/Related. Spearman correlations were performed between scores of the BIS-11 subscales (Attentional, Motor and Non-planning impulsivity) and the reaction time (RT) and hemodynamic responses (β) of the Stroop-matching/stop-signal task. Alpha level = 0.05.

Results

RTs in all conditions of the task were positively correlated with Motor Impulsivity scores (Congruent/Unrelated, rho = .31, p = .025; Incongruent/Unrelated, rho = .27, p = .049; Incongruent/Related, rho = .38, p = .005). Brain activity in the left temporoparietal region was positively correlated with Attention Impulsivity scores (rho = .29, p = .033).

Conclusions

Motor and attentional aspects of trait impulsivity can be differently correlated with behavioral and neurophysiological measures of state impulsivity. In this study, motor impulsivity was correlated with more peripherical measures of inhibition (reaction times) while attentional impulsivity was correlated with activity in temporoparietal regions commonly associated with inhibition of distractive stimuli. Greater levels of motor and attentional impulsivity were associated with slower responses and greater brain activity, respectively.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.