Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-b5cpw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-16T05:25:51.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electroencephalogram (EEG) Based Prediction of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Using Machine Learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

J. Kim*
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea, Republic Of
S. Yang
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea, Republic Of
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder that presents challenges in achieving accurate and timely diagnosis.

Objectives

This study investigates the effectiveness of using electroencephalogram (EEG) data combined with machine learning techniques to enhance the prediction accuracy for ADHD diagnosis.

Methods

A total of 168 subjects were evaluated using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Present and Lifetime Version Korean Version (K-SADS-PL-K), categorizing them into two groups: ADHD (n=107) and Neurotypical (NT, n=61). We analyzed quantitative EEG (qEEG) data across 19 channels, focusing on frequency ranges including delta (1–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), alpha (8–12 Hz), beta (12–25 Hz), high beta (25–30 Hz), and gamma (30–80 Hz). To classify ADHD versus NT groups, the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) classifier was utilized, with Leave-One-Subject-Out (LOSO) cross-validation employed to assess model performance.

Results

To address the issue of limited data, we segmented each subject’s EEG data into 30-second intervals, resulting in 2434 segments for the ADHD group and 1060 segments for the NT group (figure 1). These segments were used to train the machine learning model. The XGBoost algorithm, combined with the LOSO cross-validation strategy, achieved a test accuracy of 90.81% and an F1 score of 0.9347, demonstrating robust performance in distinguishing between ADHD and NT subjects (figure 2). Feature importance analysis using SHAP values highlighted that EEG features from specific frequency bands, particularly the middle beta/theta ratio and relative gamma of O1 electrode sites, played a crucial role in the classification (figure 3).

Image 1:

Image 2:

Image 3:

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that EEG-based machine learning models hold significant potential as non-invasive tools for assisting in the diagnosis of ADHD. Further research with larger datasets and additional validation is necessary to confirm these results and explore their clinical applicability.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.