Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-m259h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-18T17:08:53.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Treatment Compared to Placebo in Adults with Binge-Eating Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

M. Prätzel Ellwanger
Affiliation:
Universidade do Contestado, Mafra
V. Astori*
Affiliation:
Escola Superior de Ciências da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória, Vitória
B. Westphalen Pomianoski
Affiliation:
Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo
D. Lopes Vieira
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte
M. Frizzo Messinger
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Binge-Eating Disorder (BED) is characterized by frequent episodes of consuming excessive amounts of food, leading to both psychological and physical symptoms. Treatment typically involves a combination of psychotherapy and antidepressants. The disorder is often associated with dysfunctions in the dopamine and norepinephrine systems and to address these dysfunctions, lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) may offer potential benefits by targeting impulse control and reward pathways, thereby addressing these underlying issues.

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of LDX compared to placebo in adults with BED through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LDX versus placebo in patients with BED. Primary outcome was binge eating days per week (BEDW) and secondary outcomes were Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale modified for binge eating (YBOCS-BE), Clinical global impressions-improvement scale (CGI-I), weight reduction (WR) and specific occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAEs), like dry-mouth and insomnia. Mean differences (MDs), standardized mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratio (RR) were used for all outcomes. p<0.05 presented significant statistical results, while I²>40% represented a high heterogeneity.

Results

A total of 5 RCTs were included, involving a total of 963 patients, of whom 517 patients received LDX. BEDW (MD: -1.29; 95% CI [-1.65, -0.93]; p<0.01; I²=60%; Figure 1A) was significantly reduced when comparing LDX with placebo. YBOCS-BE (MD: -6.16; 95% CI [-8.35, -3.97]; p<0.01; I²=66%; Figure 1B) has shown an indication of reduction of obsessive-compulsive behaviors (OCB) in patients using LDX. CGI-I (RR: 1.72; 95% CI [1.12, 2.63]; p=0.032; I²=71%; Figure 2A), WR (SMD: -1.31; 95% CI [-1.55, -1.07]; p<0.01; I²=59%; Figure 2B). The use of LDX exhibit an increase on dry-mouth (RR: 5.08; 95% CI [3.39, 7.61]; p=0.001; I²=0%; Figure 3A) and insomnia (RR: 3.00; 95% CI [1.52, 5.94]; p=0.014; I²=0%; Figure 3B) when compared with placebo.

Image 1:

Image 2:

Image 3:

Conclusions

Our study has shown significant improvements in the use of LDX in BED. Patients presented a reduction in OCB, CGI-I, WR, and BEDW. Although some TEAEs were observed, LDX treatment in BED shows a greater benefit.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.