Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-wlffp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-21T04:25:22.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early Interventions for Preventing Self-Harm Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

G. P. Roncete*
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
L. C. Farhat
Affiliation:
Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
L. Beiram
Affiliation:
Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
K. L. Ramirez
Affiliation:
Yale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
M. H. Bloch
Affiliation:
Yale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
R. F. Damiano
Affiliation:
Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
E. C. Miguel
Affiliation:
Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Deliberate self-harm (DSH) is a strong predictor of future suicide attempts (SAs), highlighting the need to evaluate interventions that reduce recurrence risk.

Objectives

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for preventing repeated DSH in individuals recently engaged in DSH. We also examined how participants’ characteristics and trial inclusion criteria impacted interventions’ effectiveness.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with participants engaged in DSH within one month before enrollment were included. Studies with participants showing only suicidal ideation or older DSH were excluded. We searched five databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, WHO ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov) with no language restrictions through September 2023. Two reviewers independently selected studies and resolved discrepancies through discussion. Outcomes were assessed at three time points: T1 (0–6 months), T2 (6–12 months), and T3 (>12 months). The primary outcome was repeat DSH; secondary outcomes included suicidal ideation, suicide deaths, all-cause mortality, anxiety, depression, hopelessness, and quality of life. Interventions were categorized by type and delivery format (individual or group, remote or in-person).

Results

The PRISMA flowchart is shown in Image 1. Sixty-one trials involving 125 comparisons and 21,147 participants were included in this review. Average age was 31.5 years, with most being female (66.58%), unmarried (60.82%), and white (65.49%). Participants’ history of self-harm was noted in 48 studies, with at least 56% having engaged in another act before inclusion. In 42 studies, suicidal intent was either not investigated or not required. The most common types of interventions were Treatment As Usual (TAU) (46 arms), Psychotherapy (36), and Active Contact and Follow-up (25). Interventions were primarily applied individually and in person (84), with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (16) being the most frequent psychotherapy framework. Psychotherapies were associated with a reduced risk of new self-harm acts within the first six months (T1) compared to TAU (k = 12; N = 2110; OR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.48–0.99). Active contact and follow-up interventions outperformed TAU in the longer-term follow-up (T3) (k = 4; N = 3724; OR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.70–0.99).

Image 1:

Conclusions

The superiority of psychotherapies at six months was not sustained at twelve months. However, active contact and follow-up interventions may offer benefits in reducing the risk of self-harm recurrence after one year.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.