Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-9xpg2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-20T14:53:52.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diagnostic Potential of Cross-Questionnaire Analysis for Depression and Memory Disorders Using Machine Learning Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2025

M. Balkoudi
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Informatics, University of Macedonia
N. Arnaoutoglou*
Affiliation:
3rd Dpt Of Psychiatry 1st Dpt Of Psychiatry, Aristotle University Thessaloniki
K. Fountoulakis
Affiliation:
3rd Dpt Of Psychiatry
A. Saitis
Affiliation:
3rd Dpt Of Psychiatry
G. Deretzi
Affiliation:
Neurology Clinic, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
I. Diakogiannis
Affiliation:
1st Dpt Of Psychiatry, Aristotle University Thessaloniki
D. Hristu-Varsakelis
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Informatics, University of Macedonia
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Research shows a strong correlation between depression and memory disorders, suggesting the potential for cross-questionnaire data use in automated diagnostic systems. This study explores whether the Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ) can identify depressive symptoms and if the ZUNG Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) can predict memory-related disorders.

Objectives

To evaluate the effectiveness of using questionnaires intended for one mental disorder to diagnose another through machine learning models on data from a large-scale self-assessment online questionaire.

Methods

The study is part of the Memory and Depression Study: MANDY, conducted by the 1st Department of Psychiatry and the Department of Neurology of Papageorgiou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece. Data from 3340 participants were collected via an online survey containing the PRMQ, SDS, demographic data, and health-related questions. Four predictive tasks were designed: two for predicting depression using memory responses (D-from-M score and class) and two for predicting memory disorders using depression responses (M-from-D score and class). Machine learning models including LightGBM, AdaBoost, Support Vector Machines, and Logistic Regression were evaluated. Performance metrics included precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC-ROC (Figure 1).

Results

The LightGBM classifier was the top-performing model for the D-from-M class prediction task, achieving a precision of 0.75563, recall of 0.79125, an F1-score of 0.77303, and an AUC-ROC of 0.79319 on the test set (Table 1). This indicates a strong predictive capability for diagnosing depression from memory-related responses. The AdaBoost classifier had similar performance but was slightly inferior to LightGBM. For the M-from-D class task, the class imbalance (memory disorder prevalence at 5%) was a significant challenge. The best model, a Support Vector Classifier with ADASYN resampling, achieved a precision of 0.6, recall of 0.375, an F1-score of 0.46154, and an AUC-ROC of 0.86218. However, its performance was notably lower than LightGBM in predicting depression.

Image 1:

Image 2:

Conclusions

The PRMQ, combined with specific demographic and health-related questions, showed promise in predicting depression, with the LightGBM classifier as the best overall model. This underscores the potential for cross-questionnaire data utilization for diagnosing depression. Conversely, predicting memory disorders using the SDS was less effective, indicating the need for more targeted diagnostic tools. Future research should include neurocognitive and biomarker data to enhance diagnostic accuracy for memory-related conditions.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.