Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-25T22:25:04.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Schengen, the European Court of Justice and Flexibility under the Lisbon Treaty: Balancing the United Kingdom's ‘Ins’ and ‘Outs’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2009

Maria Fletcher
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Types of flexibility – Tension: demands for diversity v. logic of uniformity – United Kingdom and differentiation under Maastricht and Amsterdam – Court of Justice (77/05 and 137/05) on Articles 4 and 5 Schengen Protocol: a clear signal disapproving UK's ‘pick and choose’ approach – Lisbon Protocols: unparalleled possibilities for differentiation coupled with coercive procedural constraints and threats of ‘expulsion’.

Keywords

European UnionTreaty of LisbonTreaty of MaastrichtTreaty of AmsterdamEuropean IntegrationUnited KingdomSchengen ProtocolEuropean Court of JusticeDifferentiationOpt-outOpt-inDuty of loyal cooperationArea of Freedom, Security and Justice
Type
Articles
Information
European Constitutional Law Review , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 71 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press and the Authors 2009