Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-21T22:06:33.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Statistical stability and linear response for random hyperbolic dynamics

Part of: Dynamical systems with hyperbolic behavior Random dynamical systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2021

DAVOR DRAGIČEVIĆ  and
JULIEN SEDRO Open the ORCID record for JULIEN SEDRO [Opens in a new window]
DAVOR DRAGIČEVIĆ
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia (e-mail: ddragicevic@math.uniri.hr)
JULIEN SEDRO*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Probabilités, Statistique et Modélisation (LPSM), Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, 4 Place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France
*
e-mail: sedro@lpsm.paris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider families of random products of close-by Anosov diffeomorphisms, and show that statistical stability and linear response hold for the associated families of equivariant and stationary measures. Our analysis relies on the study of the top Oseledets space of a parametrized transfer operator cocycle, as well as ad-hoc abstract perturbation statements. As an application, we show that, when the quenched central limit theorem (CLT) holds, under the conditions that ensure linear response for our cocycle, the variance in the CLT depends differentiably on the parameter.

Keywords

linear responserandom dynamical systemsuniform hyperbolicity

MSC classification

Primary: 37D05: Hyperbolic orbits and sets 37H15: Multiplicative ergodic theory, Lyapunov exponents 37D20: Uniformly hyperbolic systems (expanding, Anosov, Axiom A, etc.)

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , February 2023 , pp. 515 - 544
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, L.. Random Dynamical Systems (Springer Monographs inMathematics). Springer, Berlin, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahsoun, W., Ruziboev, M. and Saussol, B.. Linearresponse for random dynamical systems. Adv. Math. 364 (2020),107011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahsoun, W. and Saussol, B.. Linear response in the intermittent family: differentiation in a weightedC 0-norm. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 36 (2016),6657–6668.Google Scholar
Baladi, V.. Correlation spectrum of quenched and annealed equilibrium statesfor random expanding maps. Comm. Math. Phys. 186 (1997),671–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baladi, V.. On the susceptibility function of piecewise expanding intervalmaps. Comm. Math. Phys. 275 (2007),839–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baladi, V.. Linear response, or else. ICM SeoulProceedings, Volume III. Kyung Moon Sa, Seoul, 2014, pp. 525–545.Google Scholar
Baladi, V.. Dynamical Zeta Functions and Dynamical Determinants for Hyperbolic Maps.A Functional Approach (Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Resultsin Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics], 68). Springer,Cham, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baladi, V., Kondah, A. and Schmitt, B..Random correlations for small perturbations of expanding maps. Random Comput. Dyn. 4 (1996), 179–204.Google Scholar
Baladi, V. and Smania, D.. Linear response formula for piecewise expanding unimodal maps.Nonlinearity 21 (2008), 677–711; Corrigendum:Nonlinearity 25 (2012), 2203–2205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baladi, V. and Smania, D.. Linear response for smooth deformations of generic nonuniformly hyperbolic unimodalmaps. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 45 (2012),861–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baladi, V. and Todd, M.. Linear response for intermittent maps. Comm. Math. Phys. 347 (2016), 857–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogenschütz, T.. Stochastic stability of invariantsubspaces. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 20 (2000),663–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conze, J. P. and Raugi, A.. Limit theorems for sequential expanding dynamical systems on $\left[0,1\right]$ . Ergodic Theory and Related Fields (Contemporary Mathematics, 430). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2007, pp. 89–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crimmins, H.. Stability of hyperbolic Oseledets splittings for quasi-compact operatorcocycles. Preprint, 2019, arXiv:1912.03008.Google Scholar
Crimmins, H. and Nakano, Y.. A spectral approach to quenched linear and higher-order response for partially hyperbolic dynamics.Preprint, 2021, arXiv:2105.11188.Google Scholar
Demers, M. and Liverani, C.. Stability of statistical properties in two-dimensional piecewise hyperbolicmaps. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 360 (2008),4777–4814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demers, M. and Zhang, H. K.. A functional analytic approach to perturbations of the Lorentz gas. Comm.Math. Phys. 324, 767–830 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolgopyat, D.. On differentiability of SRB states for partially hyperbolicsystems. Invent. Math. 155 (2004),389–449.Google Scholar
Dragičević, D., Froyland, G., Gonzalez-Tokman, C. andVaienti, S.. A spectral approach for quenched limit theorems forrandom hyperbolic dynamical systems. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 373 (2020),629–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dragičević, D. and Hafouta, Y.. Limit theorems for random expanding or Anosov dynamical systems and vector-valuedobservables. Ann. Henri Poincaré 21 (2020),3869–3917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froyland, G., Gonzalez-Tokman, C. and Quas, A..Stability and approximation of random invariant densities for Lasota–Yorke map cocycles.Nonlinearity 27 (2014), 647–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froyland, G., Lloyd, S. and Quas, A.. Asemi-invertible Oseledets theorem with applications to transfer operator cocycles. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 33 ( 9 ) (2013), 3835–3860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galatolo, S. and Giulietti, P.. A linear response for dynamical systems with additive noise. Nonlinearity 32 (2019), 2269–2301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galatolo, S. and Sedro, J.. Quadratic response of random and deterministic dynamical systems.Chaos 30 (2020), 023113, 15 p.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez-Tokman, C. and Quas, A.. A semi-invertible operator Oseledets theorem. Ergod. Th. & Dynam.Sys. 34 (2014), 1230–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouëzel, S. and Liverani, C.. Banach spaces adapted to Anosov systems . Ergod. Th.& Dynam. Sys. 26 (2006), 123–151.Google Scholar
Korepanov, A.. Linear response for intermittent maps with summable andnonsummable decay of correlations. Nonlinearity 29 (2016),1735–1754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruelle, D.. Differentiation of SRB states. Comm. Math.Phys. 187 (1997), 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedro, J.. A regularity result for fixed points, with applications to linearresponse. Nonlinearity 31 (2018),1417–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedro, J. and Rugh, H. H.. Regularity of characteristic exponents and linear response for transfer operatorcocycles. Comm. Math. Phys. 383 (2021),1243–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar