Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T04:59:06.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Telling Propaganda from Legitimate Political Persuasion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2023

Amelia Godber Open the ORCID record for Amelia Godber [Opens in a new window]  and
Gloria Origgi
Amelia Godber*
Affiliation:
l’École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales and the Institut Jean Nicod (ENS-PLS-EHESS), Paris, France
Gloria Origgi
Affiliation:
l’École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales and the Institut Jean Nicod (ENS-PLS-EHESS), Paris, France
*
*Corresponding author. Email: amelia.godber@mail.mcgill.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How does propaganda differ from the legitimate persuasive practices that animate a healthy democracy? The question is especially salient as digital technologies facilitate new modes of political persuasion and the public square saturates with information factual and fabricated alike. In answer, we propose a typology based on the rhetorical strategies that propaganda and its legitimate counterpart each employ. We argue that the point of contrast between the phenomena turns on two key features: whether the rhetorical strategy sufficiently engages our deliberative capacities, and whether it runs counter to our epistemic interests. While in practice the boundary between the concepts is not always sharp, the account identifies a set of conceptual tools that help better frame and come to grips with propaganda and legitimate political persuasion in an information-dense and increasingly complex media landscape.

Keywords

Propagandapolitical persuasionlegitimacypublic discourse
Type
Article
Information
Episteme , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 2023 , pp. 778 - 797
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beckman, A. (2018). ‘Political Marketing and Intellectual Autonomy.’ Journal of Political Philosophy 26(1), 24–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, J.A. (2012). ‘Argumentation as Rational Persuasion.’ Argumentation 26(1), 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brito, C. (2020). ‘Republican Congressman Trey Hollingsworth Says Americans Should Return to Work Despite Coronavirus Risk, Calling It “The Lesser of These Two Evils”.’ CBS News. Republican Congressman Trey Hollingsworth says Americans should return to work despite coronavirus risk, calling it “the lesser of these two evils” - CBS News.Google Scholar
Buckley, C. (2020). ‘Chinese Doctor, Silenced After Warning of Outbreak, Dies from Coronavirus.’ The New York Times, 6 February. Chinese Doctor, Silenced After Warning of Outbreak, Dies From Coronavirus - The New York Times.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. and Gunia, A. (2020). ‘China Says It's Beating Coronavirus. But Can We Believe Its Numbers?’ Time, 1 April. Can We Believe Any of China's Coronavirus Numbers? | Time.Google Scholar
Carter, J.A. (2020). ‘Intellectual Autonomy, Epistemic Dependence and Cognitive Enhancement.’ Synthese 197, 2937–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassam, Q. (2019). Conspiracy Theories. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cassam, Q. (2021). ‘Bullshit, Post-Truth and Propaganda.’ In Edenberg, E. and Hannong, M. (eds), Political Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Combs, J.E. and Nimmo, D. (1993). The New Propaganda: The Dictatorship of Palaver in Contemporary Politics. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Crossley, G. (2021). ‘China Rejects WHO Plan for Study of COVID-19 Origin.’ Reuters, 22 July. China rejects WHO plan for study of COVID-19 origin | Reuters.Google Scholar
Cunningham, S. (2002). The Idea of Propaganda: A Reconstruction. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Davis, R. (2017). ‘Rational Persuasion, Paternalism and Respect.’ Res Publica 23, 513–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellul, J. (1965). Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
EUvsDisinfo, East StratCom Task Force (2020). ‘Disinformation Can Kill.’ Disinformation Reviews 189. 26 March. Disinformation Can Kill.Google Scholar
EUvsDisinfo, East StratCom Task Force (2021). ‘Telling Half Truths Is Also Lying.’ 22 January. Telling Half-Truths is Also Lying - EU vs DISINFORMATION.Google Scholar
Gill, M. (2012). ‘Presidential Politics Goes to Sesame Street: Obama Says Romney Wants to Fire Big Bird’. PolitiFact, 9 October. PolitiFact | Presidential politics goes to Sesame Street: Obama says Romney wants to fire Big Bird.Google Scholar
Graham, D.A. (2019). ‘Trump's Most Pointless Lie’. The Atlantic, 5 September. Trump's Pointless Lie on Hurricane Dorian and Alabama - The Atlantic.Google Scholar
Herman, E.S. and Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Hyska, M. (2021). ‘Propaganda, Irrationality and Group Agency.’ In Hannon, M. and de Ridder, J. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, K. (2012). ‘Trustworthiness’. Ethics 123(1), 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadir, S.A., Lokman, A.M. and Tsuschiya, T. (2016). ‘Emotions and Techniques of Propaganda in YouTube Videos.’ Indian Journal of Science and Technology 9(S1).Google Scholar
Khalid, A. (Host). (2019). ‘'Details Are Irrelevant': Biden Says Verbal Slip-Ups Don't Undermine His Judgment.’ [Audio podcast episode]. The NPR Politics Podcast, 3 September. https://www.npr.org/transcripts/756872790?storyId=756872790&t=1581853760097?storyId=756872790&t=1581853760097&t=1658478806630.Google Scholar
Manson, N. (2012). ‘Making Sense of Spin.’ Journal of Applied Philosophy 29(3), 200–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlin, R. (1989). Propaganda and the Ethics of Persuasion. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
McKenna, R. (2020). ‘Persuasion and Epistemic Paternalism.’ In Bernal, A. and Axtell, G. (eds), Epistemic Paternalism: Conceptions, Justifications and Implications, pp. 91–106. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Molter, V. (2020). ‘Pandemics and Propaganda: How Chinese State Media Shapes Conversations on the Coronavirus.’ Cyber Policy Center, Stanford Internet Observatory. FSI | Cyber - Virality Project (China): Pandemics & Propaganda.Google Scholar
Qiu, L. (2020). ‘Trump Cherry-Picks Coronavirus Data in Briefing Appearance.’ The New York Times, 4 August. Trump Cherry-Picks Coronavirus Data in Briefing Appearance - The New York Times.Google Scholar
Ricard, J. and Medeiros, J. (2020). ‘Using Misinformation as a Political Weapon: COVID-19 and Bolsonaro in Brazil.’ The Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, E. (2017). ‘The Beneficent Nudge Program and Epistemic Injustice.’ Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20(3), 597–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R.C. and Wood, J.W. (2007). Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roozenbeek, J., van der Linden, S. and Nygren, T. (2020). ‘Prebunking Interventions Based on “Inoculation” Theory can Reduce Susceptibility to Misinformation Across Cultures.’ The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 1(2).Google Scholar
Ross, S.T. (2002). ‘The Epistemic Merit Model and Its Application to Art.’ Journal of Aesthetic Education 36(1), 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, J. (2015). How Propaganda Works. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C.R. (2016). ‘Fifty Shades of Manipulation.’ Journal of Marketing Behavior 1(3–4), 213–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tsai, G. (2014). ‘Rational Persuasion as Paternalism.’ Philosophy & Public Affairs 42(1), 78–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valverde, M. (2019). ‘Joe Biden Falsely Claims That He Immediately Opposed Iraq War.’ PolitiFact, 5 September. PolitiFact | Barack Obama says that what he'd said was you could keep your plan ‘if it hasn't changed since the law passed’.Google Scholar
Valverde, M. (2020). ‘Fact-Checking Whether Biden Called Trump ‘Xenophobic’ for Restrictions on Travel from China.’ PolitiFact, 27 March. PolitiFact | Fact-checking whether Biden called Trump ‘xenophobic’ for restrictions on travel from China.Google Scholar
Walton, D. (1997). ‘What is Propaganda and What Exactly is Wrong with It?’ Public Affairs Quarterly 11(4), 383–413.Google Scholar
Wimberly, C. (2017). ‘The Job of Creating Desire: Propaganda as An Apparatus of Government and Subjectification.’ Journal of Speculative Philosophy 31(1), 101–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimberly, C. (2019). How Propaganda Became Public Relations: Foucault and the Corporate Government of the Public. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (2020). ‘Managing the COVID-19 Infodemic: Promoting Healthy Behaviours and Mitigating the Harm from Misinformation and Disinformation.’ Joint statement by WHO, UN, UNICEF, UNDP, UNESCO, UNAIDS, ITU, UN Global Pulse, and IFRC. Managing the COVID-19 infodemic: Promoting healthy behaviours and mitigating the harm from misinformation and disinformation.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, L. (2013). ‘Intellectual Autonomy.’ Philosophical Issues 23(1), 244–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar