Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-ff9ft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-11T14:48:07.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sampling rabbit pox aerosols of natural origin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. Thomas
G. Thomas
Affiliation:
Microbiological Research Establishment, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wilts.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Natural aerosols of rabbit pox virus produced by groups of infected rabbits were sampled with a slit and Andersen sampler using an adhesive surface sampling technique (Thomas, 1970). The higher rate of successful recoveries of airborne virus compared with a previous report is believed to be due to the much larger volume of air sampled by this technique and to the processing of the whole of the sample collected by the direct addition of a cell suspension to demonstrate the presence of viable virus.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 68 , Issue 4 , December 1970 , pp. 511 - 517
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, A. (1958). A new sampler for the collection, sizing and enumeration of viable airborne particles. Journal of Bacteriology 76, 471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Appleyard, G. & Westwood, J. C. N. (1964). The growth of rabbit pox virus in tissue cultures. Journal of General Microbiology 37, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brachman, P. S., Ehrlich, R., Eichenwald, H. F., Cabelli, V. J., Kethley, T. W., Madin, S. H., Maltman, J. R., Middlebrook, G., Morton, J. D., Silver, I. H. & Wolfe, E. K. (1964). Standard sampler for assay of airborne micro-organisms. Science, New York 144,1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, C. N., Aylward, M. & Lacey, D. (1951). Impingement of dust from air jets. American Medical Association, Archives of Industrial Hygiene 4, 354.Google ScholarPubMed
Downie, A. W., Meiklejohn, M., Vincent, L. St, Rao, A. R., Sundra Babu, B. V. & Kempe, C. H. (1965). The recovery of smallpox from patients and their environment in a smallpox hospital. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 33, 615.Google Scholar
May, K. R. & Harper, G. J. (1957). The efficiency of various liquid impinger samples in bacterial aerosols. British Journal of Industrial Medicine 14, 287.Google Scholar
Meiklejohn, G., Kempe, C. H., Downie, A. W., Berge, T. O., Vincent, L. St & Rao, A. R. (1961). Air sampling to recover variola virus in the environment of a smallpox hospital. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 25, 63.Google ScholarPubMed
Morris, E. J., Darlow, H. M., Peel, J. F. H. & Wright, W. C. (1961). The quantitative assay of monodispersed aerosols of bacteria and bacteriophage by electrostatic precipitation. Journal of Hygiene 59, 487.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. (1970). An adhesive surface sampling technique for airborne viruses. Journal of Hygiene 68, 273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westwood, J. C. N., Boulter, E. A., Bowen, E. T. & Maber, H. B. (1966). Experimental respiratory infection with pox viruses. 1: Clinical virological and epidemiological studies. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 47, 453.Google Scholar