Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-ff9ft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-25T00:17:44.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of complement-fixation titres in poliomyelitis-infected tissue-culture fluids and mouse brains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Golda Selzer
Golda Selzer
Affiliation:
The C.S.I.R. and U.C.T. Virus Research Unit, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town (South Africa)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Ultra-centrifugation of emulsions from suckling mouse brains infected with the MEF1 strain of poliomyelitis virus separates a non-infective antigen, or soluble antigen, from infective virus. This antigen is responsible for most of the complement fixation and explains the high titres obtained. On the other hand, the same virus, and also Mahoney, Type 1 poliomyelitis virus, grown in monkey kidney tissue culture, fail to produce this soluble antigen, and this is probably a factor in the low complement-fixing titres obtained in tests with these fluids.

The author would like to express her appreciation of Miss M. Butchart's valuable technical assistance.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , June 1958 , pp. 254 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

References

REFERENCES

Casals, J. (1949). Acetone-ether extracted antigens for complement fixation with certain neurotropic viruses. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 70, 339.Google Scholar
Casals, J. & Olitsky, P. K. (1950). A complement fixation test for poliomyelitis. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 75, 315.Google Scholar
Melnick, J. L., Rappaport, C., Banker, D. D. & Bhatt, P. N. (1955). Stabilized suspension of monkey kidney cells suitable for inter-continental shipment. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 88, 678.Google Scholar
Reed, L. & Muench, H. (1938). Simple method of estimating 50 per cent endpoints. Amer. J. Hyg. 27, 493.Google Scholar
Selzer, G. & Polson, A. (1954). Dispersion analyses of the MEF1 strain of poliomyelitis virus, Biochim. biophys. Acta, 15, 251.Google Scholar
Selzer, G., Sacks, M. & van Den Ende, M. (1952). Adaptation and multiplication rate of the MEF1 strain of poliomyelitis virus in newborn mice. S. Afr. med. J. 26, 201.Google Scholar
Selzer, G. & van den Ende, M. (1956). Further experiments with the soluble antigen of the MEF1 poliomyelitis virus. J. Hyg., Camb., 54, 1.Google Scholar