Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T04:02:05.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of a new phagetyping scheme to campylobacters isolated during outbreaks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

S. M. Salama ,
F. J. Bolton  and
D. N. Hutchinson
S. M. Salama
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, Royal Preston Hospital, PO Box 202, Sharoe Green Lane North, Preston PR2 4HG
F. J. Bolton*
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, Royal Preston Hospital, PO Box 202, Sharoe Green Lane North, Preston PR2 4HG
D. N. Hutchinson
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, Royal Preston Hospital, PO Box 202, Sharoe Green Lane North, Preston PR2 4HG
*
* Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A new scheme for phagetyping campylobacters has been evaluated using strains isolated from five outbreaks. The phagetyping results have been compared with the results of Penner serotyping, Lior serotyping and Preston biotyping. Phagetyping recognized the causative strains in all of the incidents and also differentiated these strains from animal and environmental strains isolated during these investigations. In some outbreaks phagetyping proved to be more discriminatory than serotyping or biotyping, e.g. strains of Penner serotype 2, and serogroup 4, 13, 16, 50 were subdivided by this method. Phagetyping is to be recommended for typing strains from outbreaks and although the results indicate that it may be used alone we advocate that it should be used in conjunction with one of the established typing methods.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 104 , Issue 3 , June 1990 , pp. 405 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

References

REFERENCES

1.Skirrow, MB, Benjamin, J. Differentiation of enteropathogenie campylobacter. J Clin Pathol 1980; 33: 1122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Lior, H. New extended biotyping scheme for Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, and ‘Campylobacter laridis’. J Clin Microbiol 1984; 20: 636–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Bolton, FJ., Holt, AV, Hutchinson, DN. Campylobacter biotyping scheme of epidemiological value. J Clin Pathol 1984; 37: 677–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Penner, JL, Hennessy, JN. Passive haemagglutination technique for serotyping Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni on the basis of soluble heat-stable antigens. J Clin Microbiol 1980; 12: 732–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Lior, H, Woodward, DL, Edgar, JA, Laroche, LA, Gill, P. Serotyping of Campylobacter jejuni by slide agglutination based on heat-stable antigenic factors. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 15: 761–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Bradbury, WC, Murray, AM, Hennessey, JN, Penner, JL. Occurrence of plasmid DNA in serologically defined strains of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Infect Immun 1983; 40: 460–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Ambrosio, RE, Lastovica, AJ. A rapid screening procedure for detection of plasmids in campylobacters. In: Pearson, AD, Skirrow, MB, Rowe, B, Davies, J, Jones, DM, eds. Campylobacter II. London: Public Health Laboratory Service, 1983; 28.Google Scholar
8.Tenover, FC, Williams, S, Gordon, KP, Harris, N, Nolan, C, Plorde, JJ. Utility of plasmid finger printing for epidemiological studies of Campylobacter jejuni infections. J Infect Dis 1984; 149: 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.El-harif, Z, Megraud, F. Enzymatic profiles of thermophilic campylobacters. In: Pearson, AD, Skirrow, MB, Rowe, B, Davies, J, Jones, DM, eds. Campylobacter II. London: Public Health Laboratory Service. 1983: 44.Google Scholar
10.Kakoyiannis, CK, Winter, PJ, Marshal, RB. Identification of Campylobacter coli isolates from animals and humans by bacterial restriction endonuclease DNA analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 1984; 48: 545–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Grajewski, BA, Kusek, JW, Gelfaud, HM. Development of a bacteriophage typing system for Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. J Clin Microbiol 1985; 22: 13–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Lior, H, Woodward, DL, Khakhria, R. Characterization of Campylobacter jejuni outbreaks by three epidemiological typing markers. In: Kaijser, B, Falsen, E, eds. Campylobacter IV. Goterna: Sweden, 1988: 103–4.Google Scholar
13.Salama, S, Bolton, FJ, Hutchinson, DN. Improved method for the isolation of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli bacteriophages. Lett Appl Microbiol 1989; 8: 5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Miller, I, Bolton, F, Dawkins, HC. An outbreak of campylobacter enteritis transmitted by puppies. Environmental Health 1987: 95: 11–14.Google Scholar
15.Hutchinson, DN, Bolton, FJ, Hinchliffe, PM et al. , Evidence of udder excretion of Campylobacter jejuni as the cause of a milk-borne Campylobacter outbreak. J Hvg 1985; 94: 205–15.Google ScholarPubMed
16.Hutchinson, DN, Bolton, FJ, Jelley, WCN et al. , Campylobacter associated with the consumption of raw goat's milk. Lancet 1985; I: 1037–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Adams, MH. In: Bacteriophages. New York: Interscience Inc. 1959: 450–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Hutchinson, DN, Bolton, FJ, Jones, DM, Sutcliffe, EM, Abbott, JD. Application of three typing schemes (Penner, Lior, Preston) to strains of Campylobacter spp. isolated from three outbreaks. Epidemiol Tnfect 1987; 98: 139–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Jones, DM, Abbott, JD, Painter, MJ, Sutcliffe, EM. A comparison of biotypes and serotypes of Campylobacter sp. isolated from patients with enteritis and from animal and environmental sources. J Infect 1984; 9: 51–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed