Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-s7d9s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-30T06:17:32.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ISO14000 Standards and the US Construction Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2005

Hector E. Valdez
Affiliation:
Graduate, M.E. Rinker, Sr. School of Building Construction, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Abdol R. Chini
Affiliation:
Center for Construction and Environment, M.E. Rinker, Sr. School of Building Construction, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Get access

Extract

Construction activities generate a myriad of negative effects onthe environment. ISO 14000, the series of environmental managementstandards released by the International Organizationfor Standardization in 1996, has been introduced as a tool thatcan aid in reducing these impacts. The implementation of thesestandards is focused on the establishment of an environmentalmanagement system (EMS) that can guide an organization towardachieving its own environmental goals. Certification forthe ISO 14001 standard has been successfully implemented atan international level, mostly in Europe and Asia. Differenttypes of companies have achieved ISO 14000 certification, includingthose performing construction work. However, up until2002, only one construction group has received certification forits subsidiaries. Benefits such as minimization of environmentalimpacts, marketing opportunities, and cost savings have beenidentified. Some parties, however, argue about the standardsapplicability in the US construction industry, stating that ISO14000 is not economically feasible and that significant orproven environmental benefits cannot be associated with thestandards usage. Therefore, the main goal of this article is toanalyze ISO 14000 standards and their current status in the USconstruction industry, identifying advantages and setbacks ofthe application of this EMS in the organizational structures ofUS construction firms. The information is based on a literaturesearch and a case study of a construction contracting firm certi-fied for the standards. The article concludes that the positive aspectsof certification outweigh the negative aspects and recommendsadded government support and the combined use of ISO14000 with other environmental systems and matrices.

Information

Type
COMMENTARY
Copyright
© 2002 National Association for Environmental Professionals

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable