Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-10T23:47:51.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Invasive plants can modify the soil environment through litter decomposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2025

Yingsheng Liu
Affiliation:
School of Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
Yizhuo Du
Affiliation:
School of Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
Chuang Li
Affiliation:
School of Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
Yue Li
Affiliation:
School of Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
Zhelun Xu
Affiliation:
School of Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
Congyan Wang*
Affiliation:
School of Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China Marine Academy of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Technology and Material of Water Treatment, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, China
Daolin Du
Affiliation:
Jingjiang College, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
*
Corresponding author: Congyan Wang; Email: liuyuexue623@ujs.edu.cn

Summary

The successful colonization of invasive plants (IPs) may be facilitated by their nutrient release during decomposition, which alters soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, microbial metabolic processes and the diversity of soil microorganisms. This study aimed to examine the effects of co-decomposition of four Asteraceae IPs (Conyza canadensis, Conyza sumatrensis, Erigeron annuus and Solidago canadensis) along a gradient of invasion and a native plant (Pterocypsela laciniata) on decomposition rate, soil physicochemical properties, soil enzyme activities and the diversity of soil bacterial communities (SBCs). Leaves of C. canadensis with heavy invasion and S. canadensis with light and heavy invasion decomposed more slowly than P. laciniata. Leaves of C. canadensis with full invasion decomposed more rapidly than P. laciniata. Pterocypsela laciniata and C. sumatrensis had synergistic effects on each other’s decomposition, whereas P. laciniata and S. canadensis displayed an antagonistic effect. Decomposition of the four IPs increased soil microbial carbon content but reduced soil fluorescein diacetate (FDA) hydrolase activity compared to P. laciniata. Thus, invasion degree and species identity of IPs modulate the effects of the four IPs on the decomposition rate, mixed-effect intensity of co-decomposition, soil microbial carbon content, soil FDA hydrolase activity and SBC structure.

Information

Type
Report
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Foundation for Environmental Conservation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahmad Dar, M, Ahmad, M, Singh, R, Kumar Kohli, R, Singh, HP, Batish, DR (2023) Invasive plants alter soil properties and nutrient dynamics: a case study of Anthemis cotula invasion in Kashmir Himalaya. Catena 226: 107069.10.1016/j.catena.2023.107069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbe, L, Mony, C, Jung, V, Santonja, M, Bartish, I, Prinzing, A (2018) Functionally or phylogenetically distinct neighbours turn antagonism among decomposing litter species into synergy. Journal of Ecology 106: 14011414.10.1111/1365-2745.12944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, AM, Jennions, M, Nicotra, AB (2011) Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecology Letters 14: 419431.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01596.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dekanova, V, Svitkova, I, Novikmec, M, Svitok, M (2021) Litter breakdown of invasive alien plant species in a pond environment: Rapid decomposition of Solidago canadensis may alter resource dynamics. Limnologica 90: 125911.10.1016/j.limno.2021.125911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenouillas, P, Ah-Peng, C, Amy, E, Bracco, I, Dafreville, S, Gosset, M et al. (2021) Quantifying invasion degree by alien plants species in Reunion Island. Austral Ecology 46: 11251137.10.1111/aec.13048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firmino, VC, Brasil, LS, Martins, RT, Ligeiro, R, Tonin, A, Goncalves Junior, JF, Juen, L (2021) Litter decomposition of exotic and native plant species of agricultural importance in Amazonian streams. Limnology 22: 289297.10.1007/s10201-021-00655-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keet, JH, Ellis, AG, Hui, C, Novoa, A, Le Roux, JJ (2021) Impacts of invasive Australian acacias on soil bacterial community composition, microbial enzymatic activities, and nutrient availability in fynbos soils. Microbial Ecology 82: 704721.10.1007/s00248-021-01683-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kouadio, HK, Koné, AW, Touré, G-PT, Konan, LN, Yapo, GR, Abobi, HDA (2023) Litter decomposition in the mixed Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae, herbaceous)–Cajanus cajan (Fabaceae, ligneous) fallow: synergistic or antagonistic mixing effect? Agroforestry Systems 97: 15251539.10.1007/s10457-023-00874-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, YS, Du, YZ, Li, Y, Li, C, Zhong, SS, Xu, ZL et al. (2024) Does Bidens pilosa L. affect carbon and nitrogen contents, enzymatic activities, and bacterial communities in soil treated with different forms of nitrogen deposition? Microorganisms 12: 1624.10.3390/microorganisms12081624CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maan, I, Kaur, A, Sharma, A, Singh, HP, Batish, DR, Kohli, RK, Arora, NK (2022) Variations in leaf litter decomposition explain invasion success of Broussonetia papyrifera over confamilial non-invasive Morus alba in urban habitats. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 67: 127408.10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, DA, Binkley, MA (2009) Microstegium vimineum invasion changes soil chemistry and microarthropod communities in Cumberland Plateau forests. Southeastern Naturalist 8: 141156.10.1656/058.008.0113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santonja, M, Rancon, A, Fromin, N, Baldy, V, Hättenschwiler, S, Fernandez, C et al. (2017) Plant litter diversity increases microbial abundance, fungal diversity, and carbon and nitrogen cycling in a Mediterranean shrubland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 111: 124134.10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vujanović, D, Losapio, G, Milić, S, Milić, D (2022) The impact of multiple species invasion on soil and plant communities increases with invasive species co-occurrence. Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 875824.10.3389/fpls.2022.875824CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, CY, Li, Y, Li, C, Zhong, SS, Xu, ZL, Yu, YL, Du, DL (2023) A method for quantifying relative competitive advantage and the combined effect of co-invasion for two invasive plants. Plant Diversity 45: 358361.10.1016/j.pld.2023.01.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wear, EK, Wilbanks, EG, Nelson, CE, Carlson, CA (2018) Primer selection impacts specific population abundances but not community dynamics in a monthly time-series 16S rRNA gene amplicon analysis of coastal marine bacterioplankton. Environmental Microbiology 20: 27092726.10.1111/1462-2920.14091CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woods, MJ, Attea, KG, McEwan, WR (2021) Resprouting of the woody plant Pyrus calleryana influences soil ecology during invasion of grasslands in the American Midwest. Applied Soil Ecology 166: 103989.10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.103989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, SS, Xu, ZL, Yu, YL, Cheng, HY, Wang, S, Wei, M et al. (2022) Acid deposition at higher acidity weakens the antagonistic responses during the co-decomposition of two Asteraceae invasive plants. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 243: 114012.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Liu et al. supplementary material 1

Liu et al. supplementary material
Download Liu et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 3.9 MB
Supplementary material: File

Liu et al. supplementary material 2

Liu et al. supplementary material
Download Liu et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 317.7 KB