Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sq2k7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-12T19:56:06.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is natural openness or trade policy good for the environment?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2011

Steven Yamarik  and
Sucharita Ghosh
Steven Yamarik
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, California State University at Long Beach, SS/BA Building, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA. Tel: 562 985 4634. Email: syamarik@csulb.edu
Sucharita Ghosh
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Akron, USA. Email: sghosh@uakron.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we estimate the individual effects of natural openness and trade policy on air pollution. Natural openness is the component of the trade share (imports and exports as a percentage of GDP) attributable to population, geography and factor endowment differences. We find that natural openness reduces air pollution, while trade policy has a limited impact. The implication is that ‘natural’ geographic and endowment differences play a more important role than deliberate trade policy decisions in explaining the trade and environment link.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 16 , Issue 6 , December 2011 , pp. 657 - 684
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, J.E. and van Wincoop, E. (2004), ‘Trade costs’, Journal of Economic Literature (3): 691–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antweiler, W., Copeland, B.R., and Taylor, M.S. (2001), ‘Is free trade good for the environment?’ American Economic Review (4): 877–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C.S., Jansson, B.-O., Levin, S., Mäler, K.-G., Perrings, C., and Pimentel, D. (1995), ‘Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment’, Science (5210): 520–521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, S. (1994), ‘Strategic environmental policy and international trade’, Journal of Public Economics (3): 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S. and Graddy, K. (2000), ‘Freedom, growth, and the environment’, Environment and Development Economics (4): 433–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R.J. and Lee, J.-W. (1994), ‘Sources of economic growth’, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy (1): 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, A. and Krueger, A. (2003), ‘Trade, growth, and poverty: a selective survey’, IMF Working Paper WP/03/30, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, A. and Jensen, J.B. (2004), ‘Why some firms export’, Review of Economics and Statistics (2): 561–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CIESIN (Center for International Earth Science Information Network) and YCELP (Yale University Centre for Environmental Law and Policy) (2010), Environmental Performance Index, [Available at] http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/es/epi/index.html.Google Scholar
Cole, M.A. (2004), ‘Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages’, Ecological Economics (1): 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M.A. and Elliott, R.J.R. (2003), ‘Determining the trade-environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (3): 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, M.S. (2000), ‘Trade and environment: policy linkages’, Environment and Development Economics (4): 405–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, B.R. and Taylor, M.S. (2004), ‘Trade, growth and the environment’, Journal of Economic Literature (1): 7–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, S., Roberts, M.J., and Tybout, J.R. (2007), ‘Market entry costs, producer heterogeneity, and export dynamics’, Econometrica (3): 837–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, S., Mody, A., Roy, S., and Wheeler, D. (2001), ‘Environmental regulation and development: a cross-country empirical analysis’, Oxford Development Studies (2): 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollar, D. (1992), ‘Outward-oriented developing economies really do grow more rapidly: evidence from 95 LDCs (1976–1985)’, Economic Development and Cultural Change (3): 523–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, W. (2005), ‘National policies and economic growth: a reappraisal’, in Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S. (eds), Handbook of Economic Growth, Amsterdam: Elsevier, p. 1015–1059.Google Scholar
Easterly, W. and Levine, R. (2001), ‘It's not factor accumulation: stylized facts and growth models’, World Bank Economic Review (2): 177–219.*2ptCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, J., Kortum, S., and Kramarz, F. (2004), ‘Dissecting trade: firms, industries, and export destinations’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings (2): 150–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ederington, J. (2001), ‘International coordination of trade and domestic policies’, American Economic Review (5): 1580–1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S. (1998), ‘Openness, productivity and growth: what do we really know?’, The Economic Journal (447): 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esty, D.C. and Gentry, B.S. (1997), ‘Foreign investment, globalization, and the environment’, in Jones, T. (ed.), Globalization and Environment: Preliminary Perspectives, Paris: OECD, p. 141–197.Google Scholar
Frankel, J.A. (2008), ‘Global environmental policy and global trade policy’, John F. Kennedy School of Government Faculty Research Working Paper Series No. RWP08-058, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Frankel, J.A. and Romer, D. (1999), ‘Does trade cause growth?’, American Economic Review (3): 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, J.A. and Rose, A.K. (2005), ‘Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality’, Review of Economics and Statistics (1): 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B. (1993), ‘Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement’, in Garber, P.M. (ed.), The U.S.–Mexico Free Trade Agreement, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 13–56.Google Scholar
Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., and Block, W. (1996), Economic Freedom of the World: 1975–1995, Vancouver: Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
Harbaugh, W.T., Levinson, A., and Wilson, D.M. (2002), ‘Reexamining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve’, Review of Economics and Statistics (3): 541–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummels, D. (1999), ‘Toward a geography of trade costs’, Global Trade Analysis Project Working Paper No. 17, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
Hummels, D. (2010), ‘Transportation costs and adjustments to trade’, in Hoekman, B. and Porto, G. (eds), Trade Adjustment Costs in Developing Countries: Impacts, Determinants and Policy Responses, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research, p. 255–264.Google Scholar
Hummels, D. and Skiba, A. (2004), ‘Shipping the good apples out? An empirical confirmation of the Alchian–Allen conjecture’, Journal of Political Economy 112(6): 1384–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummels, D., Lugovskyy, V. and Skiba, A. (2009), ‘The trade reducing effects of market power in international shipping’, Journal of Development Economics (1): 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B.T. and Sheehy, T.P. (1996), 1996 Index of Economic Freedom, Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
Kellenberg, D.K. (2008), ‘A reexamination of the role of income for the trade and environment debate’, Ecological Economics (1–2): 106–115.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P.W. (1994), ‘Equilibrium pollution taxes in open economies with imperfect competition’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (1):49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P.R. (1980), ‘Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade’, American Economic Review (5): 950–959.Google Scholar
Leamer, E. (1988), ‘Measures of openness’, in Baldwin, R. (ed.), Trade Policy Issues and Empirical Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p. 145–204.Google Scholar
Lovely, M. and Popp, D. (2011), ‘Trade, technology, and the environment: does access to technology promote environmental regulation?’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (1): 16–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R.E.B., Wheeler, D., and Hettige, H. (1992), ‘Economic development, environmental regulation and the international migration of toxic industrial pollution: 1960–88’, World Bank Policy Research Discussion Paper WPS 1062, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Managi, S., Hibiki, A., and Tsurumi, T. (2009), ‘Does trade openness improve environmental quality?’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (3): 346–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medin, H. (2002), ‘Firms’ export decisions – fixed trade costs and the size of the export market', Journal of International Economics (1): 225–241.Google Scholar
Nogues, J., Olechowski, A., and Winters, A. (1986), ‘The extent of non-tariff barriers to industrial countries' imports’, World Bank Economic Review (1): 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2008), Environmental Data Compendium 2006–2008, Danvers, MA: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Porter, M. (1991), ‘America's green strategy’, Scientific American (4): 168.Google Scholar
Pritchett, L. (1996), ‘Measuring outward orientation in LDCs: can it be done?’ Journal of Development Economics (2): 307–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, F. and Rodrik, D. (2001), ‘Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic's guide to the cross-national evidence’, in Bernanke, B. and Rogoff, K. (eds), Macroeconomics Annual 2000, Cambridge MA: MIT Press for NBER, p. 261–324.Google Scholar
Rose, A.K. (2004), ‘Do WTO members have more liberal trade policy?’ Journal of International Economics (2): 209–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J.D. and Warner, A.M. (1995), ‘Economic reform and the process of global integration’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (1): 1–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. (1954), ‘The transfer problem and transport costs II: analysis of effects of trade impediments’, Economic Journal (254): 264–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafik, N. and Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992), ‘Economic growth and environmental quality: time-series and cross-country evidence’, World Bank Policy Research Discussion Paper WPS 904, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Shea, J. (1997), ‘Instrument relevance in multivariate linear models: a simple measure’, Review of Economics and Statistics (2): 348–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spilimbergo, A., Londoño, J.L., and Székely, M. (1999), ‘Income distribution, factor endowments, and trade openness’, Journal of Development Economics (1): 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, J.H. and Yogo, H. (2005), ‘Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression’, in Stock, J.H. and Andrews, D.W.K. (eds), Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: A Festschrift in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, p. 80–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, J.H., Wright, J.H., and Yogo, M. (2002), ‘A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments’, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics (4): 518–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venables, A.J. (1994), ‘Integration and the export behavior of firms – trade costs, trade volume and welfare’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv (1): 118–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacziarg, R. (2001), ‘Measuring the dynamic gains from trade’, World Bank Economic Review (3): 393–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacziarg, R. and Welch, K.H. (2008), ‘Trade liberalization and growth: new evidence’, The World Bank Economic Review (2): 187–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, S.-J. (2000), ‘Natural openness and good governance’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 7765, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Wolf, H.C. (1993), ‘Trade orientation: measurement and consequences’, Estudios de Economia (esp): 49–86.Google Scholar
Bank, World (2010), World Development Indicators, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar