Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-xc2tv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-21T19:04:03.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impacts of Bt cotton on profitability, productivity and farm inputs in Pakistan: use of panel models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2017

Khuda Bakhsh
Khuda Bakhsh*
Affiliation:
Department of Management Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Vehari 360000, Pakistan. E-mail: kbakhsh@ciitvehari.edu.pk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study estimates the benefits from adopting Bt cotton seeds in Punjab, Pakistan over two cropping seasons - 2008 and 2009. The study uses the panel modeling approach to determine the average effects of Bt cotton technology on short-run profits, yields and farm inputs. This approach controls for biases resulting from self-selection and endogenous farm inputs. The study shows that, on average, Bt adopting farmers receive 9 per cent higher yields per hectare (ha), reduce per-ha pesticide use by 21.7 per cent, and increase per-ha use of irrigation water by 6 per cent. Our estimates of the increase in cotton yield are far below estimates from previous studies conducted in Pakistan and India, which do not use panel methods. Allowing more Bt cotton varieties and ensuring the availability of quality Bt cotton seeds in the market is likely to lead to further increase in the private benefits from Bt cotton.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , August 2017 , pp. 373 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abedullah, S. Kouser, and Qaim, M. (2015), ‘Bt cotton, pesticide use and environmental efficiency in Pakistan’, Journal of Agricultural Economics 66(1): 66–86.Google Scholar
Ali, A. and Abdulai, A. (2010), ‘The adoption of genetically modified cotton and poverty reduction in Pakistan’, Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(1): 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antle, J.M., Cole, D.C., and Crissman, C.C. (1998), ‘Further evidence on pesticides, productivity and farmer health: potato production in Ecuador’, Agricultural Economics 18(2): 199–207.Google Scholar
Bakhsh, K., Akram, W., Jahanzeb, A., and Khan, M. (2016), ‘Estimating productivity of Bt cotton and its impact on pesticide use in Punjab (Pakistan)’, Pakistan Economic and Social Review 54(1): 15–24.Google Scholar
Bennett, R., Ismael, Y., Morse, S., and Shankar, B. (2004), ‘Reductions in insecticide use from adoption of Bt cotton in South Africa: impacts on economic performance and toxic load to the environment’, Journal of Agricultural Science 142(6): 665–674.Google Scholar
Bennett, R., Kambhampati, U., Morse, S., and Ismael, B. (2006), ‘Farm-level economic performance of genetically modified cotton in Maharashtra, India’, Review of Agricultural Economics 28(1): 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crost, B., Shankar, B., Bennett, R., and Morse, S. (2007), ‘Bias from farmer self-selection in genetically modified crop productivity estimates: evidence from Indian data’, Journal of Agricultural Economics 58(1): 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farooqi, Z. (2010), ‘Comparative performance of Bt cotton: economic and environmental aspects’, MSc (Hons) thesis, Department of Environmental and Resource Economics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad-Pakistan.Google Scholar
Gong, Y., Baylis, K., Kozak, R., and Bull, G. (2016), ‘Farmers’ risk preferences and pesticide use decisions: evidence from field experiments in China’, Agricultural Economics 47(4): 1–11.Google Scholar
Government of Pakistan (2010), Pakistan Economic Survey, 2009–2010, Islamabad: Finance Division, Economic Adviser's Wing, Government of Pakistan.Google Scholar
Hayee, A. (2005), ‘Cultivation of Bt cotton – Pakistan's experience’, [Available at] www.actionaid.org/pakistan.Google Scholar
Huang, J., Rozelle, S., Pray, C., and Wang, Q. (2002), ‘Plant biotechnology in China’, Science 295(5555): 674–677.Google Scholar
Huang, J., Raifa, H., Rozelle, S., and Pray, C. (2005), ‘Insect-resistant GM rice in farmers’ fields: assessing productivity and health effects in China’, Science 308(5722): 688–690.Google Scholar
Kathage, J. and Qaim, M. (2012), ‘Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109(29): 11652–11656.Google Scholar
Kouser, S. and Qaim, M. (2011), ‘Impact of Bt cotton on pesticide poisoning in smallholder agriculture: a panel data analysis’, Ecological Economics 70(11): 2105–2113.Google Scholar
Kouser, S. and Qaim, M. (2013), ‘Valuing financial, health, and environmental benefits of Bt cotton in Pakistan’, Agricultural Economics 44(3): 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouser, S. and Qaim, M. (2014), ‘Bt cotton, damage control, and optimal levels of pesticide use in Pakistan’, Environment and Development Economics 19(6): 704–723.Google Scholar
Liu, E.M. (2013), ‘Time to change what to sow: risk preferences and technology adoption decisions of cotton farmers in China’, Review of Economics and Statistics 95(4): 1386–1403.Google Scholar
Liu, E.M. and Huang, J. (2013), ‘Risk preferences and pesticide use by cotton farmers in China’, Journal of Development Economics 103: 202–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulwa, R., Wafula, D., Karembu, M., and Waithaka, M. (2013), ‘Estimating the potential economic benefits of adopting Bt cotton in selected COMESA countries’, AgBioForum 16(1): 14–26.Google Scholar
Nazli, H. (2010), ‘Impact of Bt cotton adoption on farmers’ wellbeing in Pakistan’, PhD dissertation, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Guelph, Canada.Google Scholar
Park, J.R., McFarlane, I., Phipps, R.H., and Ceddia, G. (2011), ‘The role of transgenic crops in sustainable development’, Plant Biotechnology Journal 9(1): 2–21.Google Scholar
Pray, C.E., Huang, J., Hu, R., and Rozelle, S. (2002), ‘Five years of Bt cotton in China – the benefits continue’, Plant Journal 31(4): 423–430.Google Scholar
Qaim, M. and de Janvry, A. (2003), ‘Genetically modified crops, corporate pricing strategies, and farmers’ adoption: the case of Bt cotton in Argentina’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(4): 814–828.Google Scholar
Qaim, M. and de Janvry, A. (2005), ‘Bt cotton and pesticide use in Argentina: economic and environmental effects’, Environment and Development Economics 10(2): 179–200.Google Scholar
Qaim, M. and Matuschke, I. (2005), ‘Impacts of genetically modified crops in developing countries: a survey’, Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 44(3): 207–227.Google Scholar
Qaim, M. and Zilberman, D. (2003), ‘Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries’, Science 299(5608): 900–902.Google Scholar
Qaim, M., Subramanian, A., Gopal, N., and Zilberman, D. (2006), ‘Adoption of Bt cotton and impact variability: insights from India’, Review of Agricultural Economics 28(1): 48–58.Google Scholar
Sadashivappa, P. and Qaim, M. (2009), ‘Bt cotton in India: development of benefits and the role of government seed price interventions’, AgBioForum 12(2): 172–183.Google Scholar
Sheikh, A.D., Mahmood, M.A., Hussain, A., Bashir, A., and Saeed, R. (2008), ‘Bt-cotton situation in Punjab’, Technology Transfer Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan.Google Scholar
Stock, J.H., Wright, J.H., and Yogo, M. (2002), ‘A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments’, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 20(4): 518–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subramanian, A. and Qaim, M. (2009), ‘Village-wide effects of agricultural biotechnology: the case of Bt cotton in India’, World Development 37(1): 256–267.Google Scholar
Subramanian, A. and Qaim, M. (2010), ‘The impact of Bt cotton on poor households in rural India’, Journal of Development Studies 46(2): 295–311.Google Scholar
Vincent, J.R. (2008), ‘The environment as a production input: a tutorial’, SANDEE Working Paper No. 32, South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics, Nepal.Google Scholar
Wu, K., Lu, Y., Feng, H., Jiang, Y., and Zhao, J. (2008), ‘Suppression of cotton bollworm in multiple crops in China in areas with Bt cotton toxin-containing cotton’, Science 321(5896): 1676–1678.Google Scholar