Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hqlzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-27T23:25:45.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impacts and acceptance of agricultural biotechnology: an introduction to the special issue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2014

David Zilberman  and
Justus Wesseler
David Zilberman
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Tel: 510 642-6570. Fax: 510 643-8911. E-mail: zilber11@berkeley.edu
Justus Wesseler
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. E-mail: Justus.wesseler@wur.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Attitudes towards and acceptance of agricultural biotechnology, which involves inserting genes that carry new traits into existing varieties, has been subject to much debate. This special issue aims to address several gaps in the literature on genetically modified (GM) technology in agriculture. Some of the papers in the issue address the economic and health aspects of genetic modification in agriculture while others examine consumers’ attitudes towards GM products, and the marketing and labeling of GM products.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 19 , Issue 6 , December 2014 , pp. 669 - 675
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Barrows, G., Sexton, S., and Zilberman, D. (2014a), ‘Agricultural biotechnology: the promise and prospects of genetically modified crops’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 28(1): 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrows, G., Sexton, S., and Zilberman, D. (2014b), ‘The impact of agricultural biotechnology on supply and land use’, Environment and Development Economics 19(6); doi: 10.1017/S1355770X14000400.Google Scholar
Bennett, A.B., Chi-Ham, C., Barrows, G., Sexton, S., and Zilberman, D. (2013), ‘Agricultural biotechnology: economics, environment, ethics, and the future’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 38: 249–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, K.R., McCluskey, J.J., and Wahl, T.I. (2004), ‘Consumer acceptance of genetically modified food products in the developing world’, AgBioForum 7 (1&2): 70–75, [Available at] http://www.agbioforum.org.Google Scholar
Heiman, A. (2014), ‘The effect of information regarding multi-attributes on consumers’ choices of GM products’, Environment and Development Economics 19(6); doi:10.1017/S1355770X14000412.Google Scholar
Just, R.E., Alston, J.M., and Zilberman, D. (2006), Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics and Policy, Vol. 30, Amsterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
Kikulwe, E., Birol, E., Wesseler, J., and Falck-Zepeda, J. (2011), ‘A latent class approach to investigating developing country consumers' demand for genetically modified staple food crops: the case of GM banana in Uganda’, Agriculture Economics 42: 547–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kikulwe, E., Falck-Zepeda, J., and Wesseler, J. (2014a), ‘Incremental benefits of genetically modified bananas in Uganda’, in Smyth, S.J., Phillips, P.W.B. and Castle, D. (eds), Handbook on Agriculture, Biotechnology and Development, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 793–807.Google Scholar
Kikulwe, E.M., Falck-Zepeda, J., and Wesseler, J. (2014b), ‘If labels for GM food were present, would consumers trust them? Insights from a consumer survey in Uganda’, Environment and Development Economics 19(6); doi: 10.1017/S1355770X13000636.Google Scholar
Kouser, S. and Qaim, M. (2014), ‘Bt cotton, damage control and optimal levels of pesticide use in Pakistan’, Environment and Development Economics 19(6); doi:10.1017/S1355770X1300051X.Google Scholar
Qaim, M. (2009), ‘The economics of genetically modified crops’, Annual Review of Resource Economics 1: 665–693.Google Scholar
Vigani, M. and Olper, A. (2014), ‘GM-free private standards, public regulation of GM products and mass media’, Environment and Development Economics 19(6); doi: 10.1017/S1355770X13000673.Google Scholar
Wesseler, J. and Zilberman, D. (2014), ‘The economic power of the Golden Rice opposition’, Environment and Development Economics 19(6); doi: 10.1017/ S1355770X1300065X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilberman, D., Kaplan, S., Kim, E., and Waterfield, G. (2014), ‘Lessons from the California GM labelling proposition on the state of crop biotechnology’, in Smyth, S.J., Phillips, P.W.B. and Castle, D. (eds), Handbook on Agriculture, Biotechnology and Development, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 538–549.Google Scholar