Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T13:29:44.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in the lexicon: the ‘Cinderella’ of sociolinguistics?

Why does variation in word forms and word meanings present such challenges for empirical research?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2012

Philip Durkin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

All of the contributions in this special issue respond to a somewhat paradoxical situation: lexis (or vocabulary) is probably the area of linguistics that is most accessible and most salient for a non-specialist audience, but at the same time it presents some uniquely difficult challenges for systematic scholarly linguistic analysis. This is especially the case for approaches that focus on statistics or quantification of data, such as are typical of modern work in sociolinguistics. For this reason, it often seems that lexis is the Cinderella that is excluded from the ball, a topic that modern sociolinguists tend to steer clear of because of the methodological difficulties. This special issue will try to investigate the background to this problem, and suggest some possible solutions.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 3 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Durkin, P. 2009. The Oxford Guide to Etymology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Durkin, P. 2010a. ‘The English Dialect Dictionary and the Oxford English Dictionary: A continuing relationship between two dictionaries.’ In Markus, M., Upton, C. & Heuberger, R. (eds), Joseph Wright's English Dialect Dictionary and Beyond. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 201–18.Google Scholar
Durkin, P. 2010b. ‘Assessing non-standard writing in lexicography.’ In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Varieties in Writing: The Written Word as Linguistic Evidence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 43–60.Google Scholar
The English Dialect Dictionary, 1898–1905. Ed. Wright, Joseph A.. London: Henry Frowde (at the expense of Joseph Wright); subsequently Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. 2010a. ‘Lexical variation in space.’ In Auer, P. & Schmidt, J. E. (eds), Language and Space: Theories and Methods: an International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 30.1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 821–36.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. 2010b. Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, P. 2000. ‘Do word meanings exist?’ Computers and the Humanities, 34, 205–11.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A. 1997. ‘I don't believe in word senses.’ Computers and the Humanities, 31, 91–113.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Mugglestone, L. 2003. Talking Proper: The Rise of Accent as Social Symbol. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
The Oxford English Dictionary, 1884–1928. Ed. Sir Murray, James A. H., Bradley, Henry, Sir Craigie, William A. and Onions, Charles T.. Supplement and Bibliography 1933. Supplement, 1972–1986; ed. Robert W. Burchfield. 2nd edition, 1989; ed. John A. Simpson and Edmund S. C. Weiner. Additions Series, 1993–7; ed. John A. Simpson, Edmund S. C. Weiner and Michael Proffitt. 3rd edition (in progress) OED Online, March 2000–, ed. John A. Simpson, www.oed.com [= OED]Google Scholar
Robinson, J. A. 2010a. ‘Awesome insights into semantic variation.’ In Geeraerts, D., Kristiansen, G. & Piersman, Y. (eds), Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 85–110.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. A. 2010b. ‘Semantic variation and change in present-day English.’ Unpublished PhD Dissertation. The University of Sheffield. Available via http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/2232/.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. A. 2011. ‘A sociolinguistic perspective on semantic change.’ In Allan, K. & Robinson, J. (eds), Current Methods in Historical Semantics. Mouton De Gruyter: Berlin, pp. 199–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebba, M. 2007. Spelling and Society: The Culture and Politics of Orthography Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C. & Dasher, R. B. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Paperback ed. wrongly dates original publication as 2005.]Google Scholar