Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-fsdjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-22T15:51:57.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Claudia Claridge, Ewa Jonsson and Merja Kytö, Intensifiers in Late Modern English: A sociopragmatic approach to courtroom discourse (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024. Pp. xxiv + 330. ISBN 9781108428668.

Review products

Claudia Claridge, Ewa Jonsson and Merja Kytö, Intensifiers in Late Modern English: A sociopragmatic approach to courtroom discourse (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024. Pp. xxiv + 330. ISBN 9781108428668.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2025

James M. Stratton*
Affiliation:
Department of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures The Pennsylvania State University University Park Campus 442 Burrowes Building 230 Old Coaly Way, PA 16802 USA james.stratton@psu.edu

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Book Review
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, LeAnn & Tagliamonte, Sali A.. 2012. A really interesting story: The influence of narrative in linguistic change. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18(2), article 2. https://repository.upenn.edu/entities/publication/cd0a72f1-5c92-444c-87cd-e9d969695052Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja. 2010. Early Modern English dialogues: Spoken interaction as writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, Magnus, Nissel, Magnus, Maiwald, Patrick & Widlitzki, Bianca. 2012. The Old Bailey Corpus. Spoken English in the 18th and 19th centuries (OBC 0.1). www1.uni-giessen.de/oldbaileycorpus/citation.html; www1.uni-giessen.de/oldbaileycorpus/index.html (last accessed by the authors on 16 November 2020; URL no longer available).Google Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas. 2007. Text types and the methodology of diachronic speech act analysis. In Fitzmaurice, Susan M. & Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Methods in historical pragmatics, 139–66. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197822.139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Stratton, James M. 2020a. Adjective intensifiers in German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 32(2), 183215.10.1017/S1470542719000163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratton, James M. 2020b. Fiction as a source of linguistic data: Evidence from television drama. Token: A Journal of English Linguistics 10, 3958.Google Scholar
Stratton, James M. 2020c. A diachronic analysis of the adjective intensifier well from Early Modern English to Present Day English. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 65(2), 216–45.10.1017/cnj.2020.6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratton, James M. & Beaman, Karen V.. 2025. Fei schee: The social meaning of intensifier use in Swabian. In Stratton, James M. & Beaman, Karen V. (eds.), Expanding variationist sociolinguistic research in varieties of German, 111–31. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stratton, James M. & Sundquist, John D.. 2022. A variationist sociolinguistic analysis of intensifiers in Oslo Norwegian. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 34(4), 385419.10.1017/S1470542722000022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Richard & Tao, Hongyin. 2007. A corpus-based sociolinguistic study of amplifiers in British English. Sociolinguistic Studies 1(2), 241–73.10.1558/sols.v1i2.241CrossRefGoogle Scholar