Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wlg5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T14:19:20.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CONSUMPTION AND SOCIAL CHANGE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2018

Nicole Hassoun
Nicole Hassoun*
Affiliation:
Binghamton University, Department of Philosophy, 4400 Vestal Parkway, East Box 6000, Binghamton, NY 13902–6000. Email: nhassoun@binghamton.edu. URL: http://harvey.binghamton.edu/~nhassoun
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

How should consumers exercise their basic economic powers? Recently, several authors have argued that consumption to bring about social change must be democratic. Others maintain that we may consume in ways that we believe promote positive change. This paper rejects both accounts and provides a new alternative. It argues that, under just institutions, people may consume as they like as long as they respect the institutions’ rules. Absent just institutions, significant moral constraints on consumption exist. Still, it is permissible, if not obligatory, for people to pursue non-democratic, genuinely positive, change within whatever moral constraints exist.

Keywords

ethical consumptioncommon good anarchismdemocratic consumptionpositive change consumption

Information

Type
Article
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 29 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bacon, C. 2005. Confronting the coffee crisis: can fair trade, organic, and specialty coffees reduce small-scale farmer vulnerability in Northern Nicaragua? World Development 33: 497–511.Google Scholar
Beckstein, M. 2016. The Politics of Economic Life. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. E. 1985. Ethics, Efficiency, and the Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Christiano, T. 2016a. A democratic conception of fair exchange in markets. University of Arizona Working Paper. <https://philosophy.arizona.edu/events/nov-3-freedom-center-colloquium-series-tom-christiano>..>Google Scholar
Christiano, T. 2016b. The tension between the nature and the norm of voluntary exchange. Southern Journal of Philosophy 51: 109–129.Google Scholar
Daily Emerald. 2000. Nike backs worker rights through FLA, but not WRC. Daily Emerald, 25 April 2000. <http://www.dailyemerald.com/2000/04/25/nike-backs-worker-rights-through-fla-but-not-wrc/>>Google Scholar
FLA Watch. 2008. What's wrong with the FLA? <http://flawatch.usas.org/about/events/>..>Google Scholar
Forest Stewardship Council Watch. 2011. FSC ‘greenwashing’ forest exploitation in Africa. <http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2011/06/17/FSC__Greenwashing__F>..>Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970. <http://www.colorado.edu/studentgroups/libertarians/issues/friedman-soc-resp-business.html>..>Google Scholar
GoodWeave International. 2013. About GoodWeave. <http://www.goodweave.net/>..>Google Scholar
Hanscom, G. 2004. Life after old growth. High Country News, 27 September 2004. <http://www.hcn.org/issues/283/15011/print_view>..>Google Scholar
Hohl, S. 2016. Ethical consumerism: a defense. In The Routledge Handbook of Food Ethics, ed. Rawlinson, M. C. and Ward, C., 188–197. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hussain, W. 2012. Is ethical consumerism an impermissible form of vigilantism? Philosophy and Public Affairs 40: 111–143.Google Scholar
Hussain, W. and Moriarty, J.. 2016. Accountable to whom? Rethinking the role of corporations in political CSR. Journal of Business Ethics (Online First, 10 Feb 2016).Google Scholar
Marti, E. 2016. Investing for a property-owning democracy? Towards a philosophical analysis of investment practices. Analyse & Kritik 35: 219–236.Google Scholar
Murphy, L. 1998. Institutions and the demands of justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 27: 251–291.Google Scholar
Murray, D., Raynolds, L. and Taylor, P.. 2003. One cup at a time: poverty alleviation and Fair Trade coffee in Latin America. Fair Trade Research Group. <http://cfat.colostate.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2009/09/One-Cup-at-a-Time.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1995. Partiality and Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Navin, M. 2015. Scaling-up alternative food networks. Journal of Social Philosophy 46: 434–448.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. 2008. World Poverty and Human Rights (2nd edn). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ruben, R. 2008. The Impact of Fair Trade. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Satz, D. 2010. Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silver, D. 2015. Business ethics after citizens united: a contractualist analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 127: 385–397.Google Scholar
United Students Against Sweatshops. 2013. <http://usas.org/>..>Google Scholar
Wettstein, F and Baur, D.. 2015. Why should we care about marriage equality? Political advocacy as a part of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 138: 199–213.Google Scholar