Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T13:41:54.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ordeals, women and gender justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2020

Anca Gheaus Open the ORCID record for Anca Gheaus [Opens in a new window]
Anca Gheaus*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Central European University, Vienna
*
Email: agheaus@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rationing health care by ordeals is likely to have different effects on women and men, and on distinct groups of women. I show how such putative effects of ordeals are relevant to achieving gender justice. I explain why some ordeals may disproportionately set back women’s interest in discretionary time, health and access to health care, and may undermine equality of opportunity for positions of advantage. Some ordeals protect the interests of the worse-off women yet set back the interests of better-off women in equal opportunities. I suggest how we can use ordeal design to advance particular aims of gender justice.

Keywords

distributive justicegender justiceordealshealth carewomen
Type
Symposium Article
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 37 , Special Issue 1: Special Issue on Ethics of Economic Ordeals , March 2021 , pp. 8 - 22
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, P. 2015. Why is depression more prevalent in women? Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 40, 219–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altas, V., Banerjee, A., Rema, H., Benjamin, A.O., Purnamasari, R. and Wai-Poi, M. 2013. Ordeal mechanisms in targeting: theory and evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. National Bureau of Economic Research: Working paper 19127. http://www.nber.org/papers/w19127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, B. 1998. The only ticket to equality: total androgyny, male style. Journal of Contemporary Legal Studies 9, 75–86.Google Scholar
Brighouse, H. and Olin-Wright, E. 2008. Strong gender egalitarianism. Politics and Society 36, 360–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brighouse, H. and Swift, A. 2014. Family Values. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, C. 2004. Are breast implants better than female genital mutilation? Autonomy, gender equality and Nussbaum’s political liberalism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyal, N., Romain, P.L. and Robertson, C. 2018. Can rationing through inconvenience be ethical? Hastings Center Report 48, 10–22. doi: 10.1002/hast.806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, N. 1994. After the family wage: gender equity and the welfare state. Political Theory 22, 591–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gheaus, A. 2008. Basic income, gender justice and the costs of gender-symmetrical lifestyles. Basic Income Studies 3(3). doi: 10.2202/1932-0183.1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gheaus, A. 2012. Gender justice. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gheaus, A. and Robeyns, I. 2011. Equality promoting parental leave. Journal of Social Philosophy 42, 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. 2011. Who’s really time poor? Family Matters 87, 9–12.Google Scholar
Goodin, R., Rice, J.M., Parpo, A. and Eriksson, L. 2008. Discretionary Time: A New Measure of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, M., Hale, S.A. and Stephens, M. 2011. Geographies of the World’s Knowledge, ed. Flick, C.M.. London: Convoco! Edition.Google Scholar
Hakim, S. 2000. Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hartley, C. and Watson, L. 2018. Equal Citizenship and Public Reason. A Feminist Political Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, A. and Machung, A. 1989. The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. 1995. Situating a feminist criticism of John Rawls’s political liberalism. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 28, 1319–1344.Google Scholar
Mikkola, M. 2017. Feminist perspective on sex and gender. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E.N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/feminism-gender.Google Scholar
National Institute of Mental Health 2019. Statistics on major depression. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/major-depression.shtml.Google Scholar
Okin, S.M. 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Okin, S.M. 1994. Political liberalism, justice, and gender. Ethics 105, 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olken, B. 2016. Hassles versus prices: how can subsidized health products best target those who value them? Science 353, 864–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsaretti, S. 2018. The costs of children. In Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Children and Childhood, eds. Gheaus, A., Calder, G. and De Wispelaere, J., 339–350. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. 2004. Defending equality of outcome. Journal of Political Philosophy 12, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe-Richards, J. 2014. Only X%: the problem of sex equality. Journal of Practical Ethics 2, 44–67.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2007. When will society be gender just? In The Future of Gender, ed. Browne, J., 54–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, J. 2016. Free Time. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schouten, G. 2019. Liberalism, Neutrality, and the Gendered Division of Labor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. Forthcoming. Sludge and ordeals. Duke Law Journal.Google Scholar
United Nations 2010. The World’s Women: Trend and Statistics, 5th edn. New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
Williams, J. 2000. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar