Skip to main content Accessibility help

Login Alert

Cancel
Log in
×
×
Register
Log In
(0) Cart
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.

Cited by
  • Crossref logo 12
  • Google Scholar logo
Crossref Citations
Crossref logo
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Tamate, Shintaro 2015. External Norms and Systematically Observed Norms. Japanese Economic Review, Vol. 66, Issue. 2, p. 247.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Begon, Jessica 2016. ATHLETIC POLICY, PASSIVE WELL-BEING: DEFENDING FREEDOM IN THE CAPABILITY APPROACH. Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 51.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Robeyns, Ingrid 2017. Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Engelen, Bart 2017. A new definition of and role for preferences in positive economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 24, Issue. 3, p. 254.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Galvão Gomes da Silva, Joana Kavanagh, David J Belpaeme, Tony Taylor, Lloyd Beeson, Konna and Andrade, Jackie 2018. Experiences of a Motivational Interview Delivered by a Robot: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 20, Issue. 5, p. e116.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Fumagalli, Roberto 2020. Buyer Beware: A Critique of Leading Virtue Ethics Defenses of Markets. Journal of Social Philosophy, Vol. 51, Issue. 3, p. 457.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Leßmann, Ortrud 2022. Collectivity and the capability approach: survey and discussion. Review of Social Economy, Vol. 80, Issue. 4, p. 461.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Mackenzie, Lee 2022. Theorising English as a Linguistic Capability: A Look at the Experiences of Economically Disadvantaged Higher Education Students in Colombia. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Vol. 23, Issue. 3, p. 477.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Messerli, Michael and Reuter, Kevin 2023. Can commitments cause counterpreferential choices?. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 30, Issue. 2, p. 94.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

2024. Social Choice, Agency, Inclusiveness and Capabilities. p. 137.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Meeks, Gay 2024. Social Choice, Agency, Inclusiveness and Capabilities. p. 170.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Hosnedlová, Renáta and Maidanik, Iryna 2025. Decoding Migration Capability: (Im)Mobility Decision‐Making in the Ukrainian Population. Population, Space and Place, Vol. 31, Issue. 8,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

×
Cambridge University Press

Our Site

  • Accessibility
  • Contact & Help
  • Legal Notices

Quick Links

  • Cambridge Core
  • Cambridge Open Engage
  • Cambridge Aspire website

Our Products

  • Journals
  • Books
  • Elements
  • Textbooks
  • Courseware

Join us online

Please choose a valid location.

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies Policy
Cambridge University Press 2025

Cancel
Confirm
×

Save article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

COMMITMENT AS MOTIVATION: AMARTYA SEN’S THEORY OF AGENCY AND THE EXPLANATION OF BEHAVIOUR
  • Volume 30, Issue 1
  • Ann E. Cudd (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267114000030
Please provide your Kindle email.
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

COMMITMENT AS MOTIVATION: AMARTYA SEN’S THEORY OF AGENCY AND THE EXPLANATION OF BEHAVIOUR
  • Volume 30, Issue 1
  • Ann E. Cudd (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267114000030
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

COMMITMENT AS MOTIVATION: AMARTYA SEN’S THEORY OF AGENCY AND THE EXPLANATION OF BEHAVIOUR
  • Volume 30, Issue 1
  • Ann E. Cudd (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267114000030
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Contents help
Close Contents help

- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Please enter your response.

Your details

Email help
Close Email help

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

Please enter a valid email address.

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Close Conflicting interests help

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.