Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-d87pz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T00:41:46.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XII.—The Lateral Sense Organs of Elasmobranchs: The Ampullary Canals of the Genus Raia.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Augusta Lamont
Augusta Lamont
Affiliation:
Baxter Scholar in Natural Science, University of Edinburgh.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For two centuries and a half the ampullary canal system of Elasmobranch fishes has occupied the attention of a series of investigators, who have treated the subject from a variety of standpoints, and have amassed a considerable literature representing, in spite of repetition and some conflicting statements, a gradual advance to a fuller knowledge regarding the occurrence and the structure of the organs in question.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , 1917 , pp. 467 - 493
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1917

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1664. Stenson, , De Musculis et Glandulis Observationum specimen, etc., Amst., 1664.Google Scholar
1669. Stenson, , Elementorum Myologiæ specimen, etc., Amst., 1669.Google Scholar
Lorenzini, , Osservazioni intorno alle Torpedini, Firenze, 1678; London, 1705, Angl.Google Scholar
Monro, Alexander, The Structure and Physiology of Fishes, 1785.Google Scholar
1801. St. Hilaire, Geoffroy, “Mémoire sur l'anatomie comparée des organes électriques de la Raie torpille, du Gymnote engourdissant, et du Silure trembleur,” Ann. Mus. Nat. d'Hist. Nat., 1802, i, p. 392.Google Scholar
1813. Jacobson, , “Extrait d'un mémoire sur un organe particulier des sens dans les Raies et les Squales,” Nouv. Bull. Sci. Société Philom. Paris, 1813, vi, p. 332.Google Scholar
1820. Treviranus, G. R., “Über die Nerven des Fünften Paars als Sinnesnerven,” Vermischte Schriften anatomischen und physiologischen Inhalts, Bremen, 1820, iii, pp. 135–146.Google Scholar
1822. Blainville, , Traité des animaux: de leur organisation, ou principes d'anatomie comparée, Paris, 1822, i.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1825. Knox, Robert, “On the Theory of the Existence of a Sixth Sense in Fishes, supposed to reside in certain peculiar Tubular Organs found immediately under the integuments of the Head in Sharks and Rays,” Edinburgh (Brewster's) Jour. Sci., 1825, ii, pp. 12–16.Google Scholar
1828. Cuvier, et Valenoiennes, , Histoire naturelle des poissons, Paris, 1828, i, p. 521.Google Scholar
1836. Delle, Chiaje, Instituzione di anatomia comparata, 1836.Google Scholar
1839. Chiaje, Delle, “Anatomiche disamine sulle Torpedini,” Atti R. Instituto d' Incorragiamento alle Scienze Nat. Napoli, 1840, vi. (Published separately in 1839.)Google Scholar
1839. Davy, John, “An Account of some Experiments and Observations on the Torpedo,” Researches Physiological and Anatomical, London, 1839, i, pp. 1–93, pls. x and xi.Google Scholar
1841. Savi, , Atti della terza Riunione degli Scienziati Italiani, Firenze, 1841, pp. 334–335.Google Scholar
1843. Savi, , Traité des phénomènes electro-physiologiques des animaux, par Matteuci, C., suivi d' “Études anatomiques sur le système nerveux et sur l'organe électrique de la Torpille,” par Paul Savi, Paris, 1844, chaps, vi and ix, pp. 329–331, pl. iii.Google Scholar
1843. Mayer, , Spicilegium Observationum Anatomicarum de Organo electrico in Raiis anelectricis, 1843.Google Scholar
1844. Miescher, , Bericht über die Verhandl. der Naturforschender Gesellschaft in Basel, vi, pp. 107–108, 31st January 1844.Google Scholar
1846. Robin, , “Recherches sur un appareil qui se trouve sur les poissons du genre des Raies (Raia Cuv.), et qui présente les caractères anatomiques des organes électriques,” Ann. des Sci. Nat., 3me série, Zoologie, 1847, vii, pp. 193–204.Google Scholar
1847. Retzius, , “Über die vermeintlichen elektrischen Organe bei den nicht elektrischen Rochen,” Froriep's Notizen aus dem Gebiete der Natur- und Heilkunde, 1848, No. 3, vol. v, pp. 54–55.Google Scholar
1849. Stannius, , Das peripherische Nervensystem der Fische anatomisch und physiologisch untersucht, Rostock, 1849, Dritter Abschnitt, pp. 20–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1851. Müller, H., “Die Nervöse Follikelapparat der Zitterrochen, und die sogenannten Schleimkanäle der Knorpelfische,” Verhandl. der Physikalisch-medicinischen Gesellschaft in Würzburg, ii, 1852; No. 9, 1851, pp. 134–144; No. 10, 1851, pp. 145–149.Google Scholar
1852. Ecker, , “Jahresbericht über die Fortschritte der vergleichenden Anatomie der Wirbelthiere in den Jahren 1845, 1846, und 1847,” Müller's Archiv für Anat., Physiol. und wissenschaftliche Medicin, 1852, p. 27.Google Scholar
1852. Leydig, , Beiträage zur mikroskopischen Anatomie und Entwickelungsgeschichte der Rochen und Haie, 1852, pp. 36–50.Google Scholar
1857. Leydig, , Lehrbuch der Histologie des Menschen und der Thiere, 1857, pp. 196–210.Google Scholar
1868. Leydig, , “Über Organe eines sechsten Sinnes,” Verhandl. der Kaiser. Leopold.-Carol. deutschen Akad. der Naturforscher (Nova Acta), 1868.Google Scholar
1858. De Lamballe, Jobert, Des appareils électriques des poissons électriques, Paris, 1858.Google Scholar
1858. Eckhard, , “Über die Endigungsweise der Nerven in den Schleimkanälen des Zitterrochen,” Beiträge zur Anat. und Physiol., Giessen, 1858, i, Fünfte Abhandlung, pp. 85–94.Google Scholar
1861. M'Donnell, , “On an Organ in the Skate which appears to be the Homologue of the Electric Organ of the Torpedo,” Nat. Hist. Review, 1861.Google Scholar
1862. Couch, , British Fishes, 1862, i.Google Scholar
1865. Duméril, , Histoire naturelle des poissons, Paris, 1865, tome première: Élasmobranches.Google Scholar
1868. Boll, , “Die Lorenzinischen Ampullen der Selachier,” Schultze's Archiv für mikro. Anat., 1868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1873. Boll, , “Ein historischer Beitrag zur Kenntniss von Torpedo,” 1873; Reichert's und Du Bois-Reymond’s Archiv für Anat. und Physiol. (Müller's Archiv), Leipzig, 1874. (On Lorenzini's Osservazioni.)Google Scholar
1870. Todaro, , Contribuzione alla anatomia e alla fisiologia dei tubi di senso dei Plagiostomi, Messina, 1870.Google Scholar
1878. Solger, B., Über die Seitenorgane der Fische,” Verhandl. der Kaiser. Leopold.-Carol. deutschen Akad. der Naturforscher (Nova Acta), 1878, Heft 14, pp. 74–80; Nachtrag, ebd. pp. 159–160.Google Scholar
Balfour, , The Development of Elasmobranch Fishes, 1878, pp. 141–147.Google Scholar
1885. Balfour, , A Treatise on Comparative Embryology, 1885, ii, p. 540.Google Scholar
1879. Sappey, , Études sur l'appareil mucipare et sur le système lymphatique des poissons, Paris, 1880.Google Scholar
1880. Merkel, , Über die Endigungen der Sensiblen Nerven in der Haut der Wirbelthiere, Rostock, 1880, pp. 39–48.Google Scholar
1880. Day, , The Fishes of Great Britain and Ireland, London and Edinburgh, 1880–1884, ii.Google Scholar
1888. Garman, , “On the Lateral Canal System of the Selachii and Holocephala,” Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard College, Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A., 1888–1889, xvii, pp. 57–119.Google Scholar
1889. Fritsch, , “Über Bau und Bedeutung der Kanalsysteme unter er Haut der Selachier,” Sitzungsberichte der König. Preuss. Akad. der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Berlin, 1888; Jahrgang 1888, Erster Halbband.Google Scholar
1890. Fritsch, , Die elektrischen Fische. Zweite Abtheilung: die Torpedineen, Leipzig, 1890, pp. 78–92.Google Scholar
1889. Ewart, , “On the Cranial Nerves of Elasmobranch Fishes: Preliminary Communication,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., xlv, November 1888–April 1889, pp. 524–537.Google Scholar
1891. Ewart, , “The Lateral Sense Organs of Elasmobranch Fishes: i, The Sensory Canals of Læmargus,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxvii, part i, 1892, pp. 59–85, pls. i and ii.Google Scholar
1891. Ewart, and Mitchell, , “The Lateral Sense Organs of Elasmobranchs: ii, The Sensory Canals of the Common Skate (Raia batis),” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 1892, vol. xxxvii, part i, pp. 87–105, pl. iii.Google Scholar
1895. Fuchs, S., “Über die Function der unter der Haut liegenden Canalsysteme bei den Selachiern,” Pflüger's Archiv für die ges. Physiol. des Menschen und der Thiere, Band lix, Bonn, 1895, pp. 454–478, pl. vi.Google Scholar
1895. Collinge, W. E., “On the Sensory and Ampullary Canals of Chimæra,” Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1895, pp. 878–890, pls. li–liii.Google Scholar
1895. Cole, F. J., “On the Sensory and Ampullary Canals of Chimæra,” Anat. Anzeiger, 1896, Band xii, pp. 172–182. (Criticism of above.)Google Scholar
1896. Cole, F. J., “On the Cranial Nerves of Chimæra monstrosa (Linn.), with a Discussion of the Lateral Line System, and of the Morphology of the Chorda tympani,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 1896, vol. xxxviii, part iii.Google Scholar
1897. Peabody, J. E., “The Ampullæ of Lorenzini of the Selachii,” Zoological Bulletin, Boston, U.S.A., 1898, vol. i, pp. 163–178, with 9 text-figures.Google Scholar
1898. Brandes, G., “Die Lorenzinisehen Ampullen,” Verhandl. der deutschen Zool. Gesells. (Achte Jahresversammlung), 1898: Leipzig, 1898, pp. 179–182.Google Scholar
1898. Forssell, G., “Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Anatomie der Lorenzinischen Ampullen bei Acanthias vulgaris,” Zeitschrift für wissenschaftlicher Zoologie, 1899, Band lxv, pp. 725–744, pl. xxxiv.Google Scholar
1901. Minckert, W., “Zur Topographie und Entwickelungsgeschichte der Lorenzinischen Ampullen,” Anat. Anz., Jena, 1901, Band xix, pp. 497–527, 11 figures.Google Scholar
1902. Allis, E. P. Jr, “The Lateral Sensory Canals, the Eye-Muscles, and the Peripheral Distribution of certain of the Cranial Nerves of Mustelus lævis,” Quart. Journ. of Micro. Science, London, 1902, vol. xlv, new series, pp. 87–236, pls. x and xi.Google Scholar
1902. Johnston, J. B., “The Homology of the Selachian Ampullæ: A Note on Allis's recent paper on Mustelus lævis, Anat. Anz., 1902, Band xxi, pp. 308–313. (Criticism of above.)Google Scholar
1902. Coggi, A., “Nuove ricerche sullo sviluppo delle ampolle di Lorenzini,” Atti R. Accad. Lincei, anno 299, 1902. Serie quinta, Rendiconti, Classe di Scienze fisiche, matematiche, naturali, Roma, 1902, vol. xi: I semestre, Nota I, pp. 289–297; Nota II, pp. 338–340.Google Scholar
1906. MrsHawkes, O. A. Merritt, “The Cranial and Spinal Nerves of Chlamydoselachus anguineus (Gar.),” Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1906, ii, pp. 959–991, pls. lxviii and lxix, and 2 text-figures.Google Scholar
1908. Brohmer, , “Die Sinneskanäle und die Lorenzinischen Ampullen bei Spinax-Embryonen,” Anat. Anz., Jena, 1908, xxxii, pp. 25–40, 8 text-figures.Google Scholar