Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-09T21:55:53.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Objective Justification and Knowledge: A Comment on Odegard's Argument

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

Thomas Vinci
Thomas Vinci
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussions/Notes
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 1980 , pp. 286 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 APQ, April 1978, pages 123–128.

2 The original version is given in K. Lehrerand T. Paxson Jr., “Knowledge: Undefeated, Justified True Belief”, JP 1969, 225 ff.

3 E.g., Dretske, “EpistemicOperators”, JP 1970.

4 Odegard has indicated to me in correspondence that he no longer accepts everything he said in the article, for reasons independent of those mentioned in this note.

5 For a more general discussion of a contextualist theory of justification and knowledge see D.B. Annis, “A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification”, American Philosophical Quarterly, July 1978, (pages 213–219).