Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-r4j94 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-02T12:30:38.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Supplement A

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Jean-Paul Gagnon*
Affiliation:
University of Canberra
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Research Note
Copyright
Copyright © Berghahn Books 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aeschines., 1919. Aeschines. Trans. Charles Darwin Adams. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Ames, Fisher. 1809. Works of Fisher Ames. Boston: T. B. Wait and Co. Andocides. 1968. Minor Attic Orators in Two Volumes. Trans. K. J. Maidment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Aristotle. 1944. Politics 21. Trans. H. Rackman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Atwood, William. 1681. Jus Anglorum ab antiquo, or, A confutation of an impotent libel against the government by king, lords, and commons under pretence of answering Mr. Petyt, and the author of Jani Anglorum facies nova. London: Printed for Edward Berry.Google Scholar
Baillie, Robert. 1645. A dissuasive from the errours of the time wherein the tenets of the principall sects, especially of the Independents, are drawn together in one map, for the most part in the words of their own authours, and their maine principles are examined by the touch-stone of the Holy Scriptures. London: Printed for Samuel Gellibrand.Google Scholar
Baldwin and Company, eds. 1827. The Annual Register, or a View of the History, Politics, and Literature of the Year 1826. London: T. C. Hansard, Pater-noster-row Press.Google Scholar
Brackenridge, Hugh Henry. 1819. Modern Chivalry: Containing the Adventures of a Captain and Teague O’Regan, His Servant. Pittsburgh: R. Patterson and Lambdin.Google Scholar
Bretherton, C. H. 1927. “Too Much Democracy.” The North American Review 224 (838): 646653.Google Scholar
Brooks, Robert C. 1935. “Democracies and their Dictatorships: The Debit Side of Their Ledgers.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 75 (6): 443481.Google Scholar
Brougham, Henry. 1861. Of Democracy. Mixed Monarchy. London: H. G. Bohn.Google Scholar
Craig, John G. 1975. “Democratic Control in Insurance Cooperatives.” Annals of Public and Co-Operative Economy 46 (2): 187200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumas, Alexandre. 1841. The Progress of Democracy. Trans. “an American” from Dumas’ original Gaule et France. New York: J. and H. G. Langley.Google Scholar
Fernow, Berthold. 1886. Albany and Its Place in the History of the United States. Albany: Charles Van Benthuysen and Sons.Google Scholar
Flinders, Matthew. 2016. “The Problem with Democracy.” Parliamentary Affairs 69 (1): 181203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnon, Jean-Paul. 2013. Evolutionary Basic Democracy: A Critical Overture. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddings, Franklin H. 1896. “The Destinies of Democracy.” Political Science Quarterly 11 (4): 716731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gitonga, Afrifa K. 1987. “The Meaning and Foundations of Democracy.” In The Democratic Theory and Practice in Africa, eds. W. O. Oyugi and A. Gitonga, 4–23. Nairobi: East African Educational Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Greene, Robert. 1587. Euphues his censure to Philautus wherein is presented a philosophicall combat betweene Hector and Achylles. London: Printed by John Wolfe for Edward White.Google Scholar
Keane, John. 2009. The Life and Death of Democracy. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. S. 1906. “The Dangers of Democracy.” International Journal of Ethics 16 (2): 129145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallock, William Hurrell. 1918. The Limits of Pure Democracy. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Mazzini, Joseph. 1875. A Memoir by E. A. V., Thoughts on Democracy, Duties of Man. London: Henry S. King and Co.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1996. “Illusions about Consolidation.” Journal of Democracy 7 (2): 3451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohio, Constitutional Convention. 1851. Official Reports of the Debates and Proceedings of the Ohio State Convention, Called to Alter, Revise or Amend the Constitution of the State. Columbus: Scott and Bascom.Google Scholar
Paley, Julia. 2002. “Toward an Anthropology of Democracy.” Annual Review of Anthropology 31 (1): 469496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rejai, Mostafa. 1967. “The Metamorphosis of Democratic Theory.” Ethics 77, 202208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupnik, Jacques, and Jan, Zielonka. 2013. “Introduction: The State of Democracy 20 Years On.” East European Politics and Societies and Cultures 27 (1): 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvadori, Massimo. 1958. Liberal Democracy. London: Pall Mall.Google Scholar
Sega, Giacomo (James). 1830. What is True Civilization, or, Means to Suppress the Practice of Duelling, to Prevent, or to Punish, Crimes, and to Abolish the Punishment of Death. Boston: William Smith.Google Scholar
Thucydides. 1910. The Peloponnesian War. London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
Vaughan, William. 1600. The golden-groue moralized in three bookes: a worke very necessary for all such, as would know how to gouerne themselues, their houses, or their countrey. London: Simon Stafford.Google Scholar
Venable, Francis P. 1916. “Some Thoughts on Democracy.” The Sewanee Review 24 (2): 214221.Google Scholar
Wolf, C Umhau. 1947. “Traces of Primitive Democracy in Ancient Israel.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 6 (2): 98108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xenophon. 1921. Xenophon in Seven Volumes. Translated by Carleton L Brownson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar