Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-s5tvr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-04T16:37:31.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Participation without Deliberation

The Crisis of Venezuelan Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Nicole Curato
Nicole Curato*
Affiliation:
Australia New Zealand Institute for Governance, University of Canberra
*
nicole.curato@canberra.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

The legacy of Hugo Chavez is contentious. Some lament the deterioration of Venezuelan democracy from one of Latin America's most stable political systems to a populist authoritarian regime. Others celebrate Chavez's participatory project of institutionalizing structures for community-driven development, redistributing oil wealth through welfare policies, and creating a political party closely linked to mass movements. This article provides an alternative assessment of Venezuela's democratic quality by drawing on deliberative democratic theory. I argue that Chavez's participatory project is incomplete because it fails to create structures for deliberative politics. Without these mechanisms, Venezuela remains vulnerable to crises brought about by “uncivil action,” such as military coups and violent protests, making deliberation an important component in averting crises in democratizing polities.

Keywords

deliberative democracydemocratizationparticipatory democracyVenezuela

Information

Type
Which Democracy Is in Crisis?
Information
Democratic Theory , Volume 1 , Issue 2: The Crisis of Democracy: Which Crisis? Which Democracy? , December 2014 , pp. 113 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Democratic Theory 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bachrach, Peter, and Aryeh, Botwinick. 1992. Power and Empowerment: A Radical Theory of Participatory Democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Burbach, Roger, and Camila, Piñeiro. 2007. “Venezuela's Participatory Socialism.” Socialism and Democracy 21 (3): 181–200.10.1080/08854300701599916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Brian. 1994. “Limitations to Democracy in Developing Capitalist Societies: The Case of Venezuela.” World Development 22 (10): 1491–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curato, Nicole. 2014. “The Deliberative Quality of Democratic Transitions: The Venezuelan Case.” Paper presented at the workshop Democracy in Crisis: Which Crisis? Which Democracy at the ANZSOG Institute for Governance, University of Canberra. 3 March.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 2009. “Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (11): 1379–1402.10.1177/0010414009332129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Encarnación, Omar. 2005. “Do Political Pacts Freeze Democracy? Spanish and South American Lessons.” West European Politics 28 (1): 182–203.10.1080/0140238042000297134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Daniel H. 1989. “Venezuela: The Nature, Sources, and Prospects of Democracy.” Pp. 247–290 in Democracy in Developing Areas: Latin America, ed. Diamond, Larry J., Linz, Juan L., and Lipset, Seymour M.. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reimer.Google Scholar
López Maya, Margarita. 2005. Del Viernes Negro al Referendo Revocatorio [From Black Friday to the recall referendum]. Caracas: Editorial Alfadil, Colección Hogueras.Google Scholar
McCoy, J. L., and Myers, D. J. (eds.) 2006. The Unraveling of Representative Democracy in Venezuela. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar