Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-tbj44 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T00:40:54.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intellectuals, Nationalism, and the Exit from Communism: The Case of East Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Christian Joppke
Christian Joppke
Affiliation:
European University Institute
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In Eastern Europe, succeeding generations of intellectuals have been at the forefront of first creating and then demolishing the communist regime. Because communism was ultimately based on ideas (“logocracy,” says C. Milosz), the abandonment of these ideas by intellectuals turned dissidents was a critical factor in the regime's demise. As Daniel Chirot (1991:20) emphasizes, communism died more from ideological exhaustion and “utter moral rot” than from its economic malaise or the pressure of organized opposition movements. The dissident intellectuals, powerless as they seemed to be, delivered the decisive blow when they denounced the regime's underlying ideology as ritualized lies out of touch with reality.

Information

Type
Intellectuals at Ebb Tide
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , April 1995 , pp. 213 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1995

References

REFERENCES

Alexeyeva, Ludmilla. 1987. Soviet Dissent. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Peter. 1986. “Nationalbewusstsein und Nationalstaat der Deutschen.” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 4 01, pp.17–30.Google Scholar
Peter, Alter. 1992. “Nationalism and German Politics After 1945,” in Breuilly, John, ed., The State of Germany. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Anz, Thomas, ed. 1991. Es geht nicht um Christa Wolf. Munich: Edition Spangenberg.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. 1962. The Opium of the Intellectuals. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Ash, Timothy Garton. 1993. In Europe's Name. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Aust, Stefan. 1986. Der Baader Meinhof Komplex. Hamburg: Hoffman und Campe.Google Scholar
Baumann, Zygmunt. 1987. “Intellectuals in East-Central Europe: Continuity and Change.” Eastern European Politics and Societies, 1:162–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benser, Günter. 1985. Die KPD im Jahre der Befreiung. East Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
Blackbourn, David; and Geoff, Eley. 1984. The Peculiarities of German History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Homo Academicus. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre; and Wacquant, Loic. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Borneman, John. 1992. Belonging in the Two Berlins. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracher, Kar. Dietrich. 1971. Das deutsche Dilemma. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
Breuer, Stefan. 1993. Anatomie der Konservativen Revolution. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Brown, Archie; and Gray, Jack, eds. 1977. Political Culture and Political Change in Communist States. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1994. “Nationhood and the National Question in the Soviet Union and Post-Soviet Eurasia.” Theory and Society, 23:1, 47–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckner, Peter. 1978. Versuch, uns und anderen die Bundesrepublik zu erklären. Berlin: Wagenbach.Google Scholar
Bubner, Rudiger. 1991. “Brauchen wir einen Begriff der Nation?,” in Braitling, P. and Reese-Schäfer, W., eds., Universalismus, Nationalismus und die neue Einheit der Deutschen. Frankfurt: Fischer.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. 1987 [1790]. Reflections on the Revolution in France. Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Child, David. 1983. The GDR: Moscow's German Ally. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Chirot, Daniel. 1991. “What Happened in Eastern Europe in 1989?,” in Chirot, D., ed., The End of Leninism and the Decline of the Left. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean; and Arato, Andrew. 1992. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Craig, Gordon A. 1982. The Germans. New York: Putnam's, G. P., Sons.Google Scholar
Dann, Otto. 1992. Nation und Nationalismus in Deutschland 1770–1990. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Dirks, Walter. 1946. “Die Zweite Republik.” Frankfurter Hefte, 1:1, 12–24.Google Scholar
Dirks, Walter. 1950. “Der restaurative Charakter der Epoche.” Frankfurter Hefte, 5:9, 942–54.Google Scholar
Domdey, Horst. 1993. “Die DDR als Droge?” Deutschland Archiv, 26:2, 161–9.Google Scholar
Dubiel, Helmut. 1991. “Beyond Mourning and Melancholy on the Left.” Praxis International, 10:3–4.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1969. Über den Prozess der Zivilisation, vol.1. Bern, and Munich: Francke.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1992. Studien über die Deutschen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Emmerich, Wolfgang. 1989. Kleine Literaturgeschichte der DDR. Frankfurt: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Feher, Ferenc. 1988. “Eastern Europe's Long Revolution Against Yalta.” Eastern European Politics and Societies, 2:1–34.Google Scholar
Fippel, Güenter. 1992. “Der Missbrauch des Faschismus-Begriffs in der SBZ/DDR.” Deutschland Archiv, 25:10, 1055–65.Google Scholar
Forsythe, Diana. 1989. “German Identity and the Problem of History,” in Tonkin, Elizabethet al., History and Ethnicity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franke, Konrad. 1971. Die Literatur der DDR. Munich: Kindler.Google Scholar
Fritze, Lothar. 1991. “Der Traum der Intellektuellen.” Sinn und Form, 43:3.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Glassner, Gert-Joachim. 1988. “Politische Kultur und nationales Erbe in der DDR,” in Jeismann, K. E., ed., Einheit-Freihe?t-Selbstbestimmung. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin. 1979. The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class. New York: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grass, Günter. 1991. Gegen die verstreichende Zeit. Hamburg: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Greenfeld, Liah. 1985. “Nationalism and Class Struggle: Two Forces or One?” Survey, 29:3, 153–74.Google Scholar
Greenfeld, Liah. 1992. Nationalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Greiffenhagen, Martin. 1986. “Intellektuelle in der deutschen Politik,” in Greiffenhagen, M., Von Potsdam nach Bonn. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
Grunenberg, Antonia. 1990. “Das Ende der Macht ist der Anfang der Literatur.” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 26 (10), 17–26.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1986. “Heinrich Heine und die Rolle des Intellektuellen in Deutschland.” Merkur, 40:6, 453–68.Google Scholar
Hammond, Thomas T. 1966. “Nationalism and National Minorities in Eastern Europe.” Journal of International Affairs, 20:1, 9–31.Google Scholar
Hankiss, Elemer. 1990. East European Alternatives. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Haraszti, Miklos. 1987. The Velvet Prison. Artists Under State Socialism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Havel, Vaclay. 1990. “The Power of the Powerless,” in Havel, V.et al., The Power of the Powerless. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Heller, Agnes. 1990. “The End of Communism.” Thesis Eleven, no.27.Google Scholar
Herzinger, Richard; and Preusser, Heinz-Peter. 1991. “DDR-Literatur in der Tradition deutscher Zivilisationskritik,” in Arnold, Heinz Ludwig, ed., Literatur in der DDR. Munich: Edition Text und Kitik.Google Scholar
Heym, Stefan. 1990. “Aschermittwoch in der DDR,” in Naumann, Michael, ed., Die Geschichte ist offen. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1990. Nations and Nationalism Since 1780. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hörnigk, Frank. 1990. “Die künstlerische Intelligenz und der Umbruch der DDR,” in Spittmann, Ilse, ed., Die DDR auf dem Weg zur deutschen Einheit. Cologne: Deutschland Archiv.Google Scholar
Hughes, Michael. 1988. Nationalism and Society: Germany 1800–1945. London.Google Scholar
Hughes, H. Stuart. 1958. Consciousness and Society. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Hyssen, Andreas. 1991. “After the Wall: The Failure of German Intellectuals.” New German Critique, no. 52, 109–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jäckel, Hartmut. 1990. “Unser schiefes DDR-Bild.” Deutschland Archiv, 23:10, 1557–65.Google Scholar
James, Harold. 1989. A German Identity. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Jaspers, Karl. 1966. Wohin treibt die Bundesrepublik? Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
Jesse, Eckhard. 1992. “Dritter Weg,” in Weidenfeld, Werner and Korte, Karl-Rudolf, eds., Handwörterbuch zur deutschen Einheit. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 1994. “Revisionism, Dissidence, Nationalism: Opposition in Leninist Regimes.” British Journal of Sociology, 45:4, 543–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 1993. “Why Leipzig? ‘Exit’ and ‘Voice’ in the East German Revolution.” German Politics, 2:3, 393–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judt, Tony. 1992. Past Imperfect. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Judt, Tony. 1993. “Die Vergangenheit ist ein anderes Land. Politische Mythen im Nachkriegseuropa.” Transit, no. 6, 87–120.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Michael. 1992. “The Intelligentsia in the Constitution of Civil Societies and Post-Communist Regimes in Hungary and Poland.” Theory and Society, 21:29–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Leonard. 1957. The German Idea of Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krockow, Christian. 1970. Nationalismus als deutsches Problem. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
Krüger, Horst. 1977. “Fremde Heimat.” Merkur, 31:3, 243–61. Kuhn!, Reinhard. 1971. Formen bürgerlicher Herrschaft. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Küsin, Vladimir. 1979. “Challenge to Normalcy: Political Opposition in Czechoslova kia, 1968–1977,” in Toekes, R., ed., Opposition in Eastern Europe. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lepenies, Wolf. 1990. “Fall und Aufstieg der Intellektuellen in Europa.” Neue Rundschau, 102:1, 9–22.Google Scholar
Lepsius, M. Rainer. 1989. “Das Erbe des Nationalsozialismus und die politische Kultur der Nachfolgestaaten des ‘Reiches, Grossdeutschen’,” in Haller, M.et al., eds., Kultur und Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Lilla, Mark. 1994. “The Other Velvet Revolution: Continental Liberalism and its Discontents.” Daedalus, 123:2, 129–57.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. Martin. 1959. Political Man. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas. 1988 [1918]. Betrachtungen eines Unpolitischen. Frankfurt: Fischer.Google Scholar
Markovits, Andrei. 1992. “The West German Left in a Changing Europe,” in Lemke, C. and Marks, G., eds., The Crisis of Socialism in Europe. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, Hans. 1991. Der Turm von Babel. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
MacAdams, James. 1985. East Germany and Detente. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacAdams, James. 1993. Germany Divided. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Meinecke, Friedrich. 1970 [1907]. Cosmopolitanism and the National State. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Meuschel, Sigrid. 1992. Legitimation und Parteiherrschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Mohr, Heinrich. 1982. “Der 17. Juni als Thema der Literatur in der DDR,” in Spittmann, I. and Fricke, K. W., eds., 17. June 1953. Cologne: Edition Deutschland Archiv.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Wolfgan. J. 1990. Nation und Geschichte. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
Muller, Heiner. 1990. Zur Lage der Nation. Berlin: Rotbuch.Google Scholar
Muller, Heiner. 1992. Krieg ohne Schlacht. Cologne: Kiepenheuer und Witsch.Google Scholar
Noll, Chaim. 1991. “Das lächerliche Pathos alter Schwärmer," in Anz, Thomas, ed., Es geht nicht um Christina Wolf. Munich: Edition Spangenberg.Google Scholar
Oevermann, Ulrich. 1990. “Zwei Staaten oder Einheit?" Merkur, 44:2, 91–106.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 1991. “Prosperity, Nation, Republic.” German Politics and Society, no. 22:18–32.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1964. “Evolutionary Universals in Society.” American Sociological Review, 29:339–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philipsen, Dirk. 1993. We Were the People. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Pike, David. 1992. The Politics of Culture in Soviet-Occupied Germany, 1945–1949. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Plessner, Helmuth. 1959. Die verspätete Nation. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Ringer, Fritz. 1969. The Decline of the German Mandarins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Joseph. 1989. Return to Diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruddenklau, Wolfgang. 1992. Störenfried. DDR-Opposition 1986–1989. Berlin: BasisDruck.Google Scholar
Rupnik, Jacques. 1979. “Dissent in Poland, 1968–78,” in Toekes, Rudolf, ed., Opposition in Eastern Europe. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rupnik, Jacques. 1989. The Other Europe. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Schneider, Peter. 1993. “Gefangen in der Geschichte.” Der Spiegel, 3:156–62.Google Scholar
Schoepflin, George. 1977. “Hungary: An Uneasy Stability,” in Brown, Archie and Gray, Jack, eds., Political Culture and Political Change in Communist States. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schuddekopf, Charles, ed. 1991. Wir sind das Volk. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Schümpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Skilling, H. Gordon. 1966. “Communism and Czechoslovak Traditions.” Journal of International Affairs, 20:1, 118–36.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony. 1986. The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sontheimer, Kurt. 1992 [1962]. Antidemokratisches Denken in der Weimarer Republik. Munich: DTV.Google Scholar
Stern, Fritz. 1961. The Politics of Cultural Despair. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1955 [1856]. The Old Regime and the French Revolution. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Torpey, John. 1993a. Intellectuals, Socialism, and Dissent: The East German Opposition and its Legacy. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Torpey, John.1993b. “The Post-Unification Left and the Appropriation of History.” German Politics and Society, no. 30, 7–20.Google Scholar
Trommler, Frank. 1991. “Die nachgeholte Resistance,” in Fetscher, J.et al., eds., Die Gruppe 47 in der Geschichte der Bundesrepublik. Würzburg: Königshauser and Neumann.Google Scholar
Verdery, Katherine. 1991. National Ideology under Socialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdery, Katherine. 1993. “Whither ‘Nation’ and ‘Nationalism’?” Daedalus, 122:3, 37–46.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1988. The Company of Critics. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1977 [1926]. Politik als Beruf. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.Google Scholar
Willke, Helmut. 1992. Ironie des Staates. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Wolf, Christa. 1990. Reden im Herbst. East Berlin: Aufbau Verlag.Google Scholar