Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-gs9qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T09:02:05.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current management and training practices for UK dressage horses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2008

J M Walters ,
T Parkin ,
H A Snart  and
R C Murray
J M Walters*
Affiliation:
Centre for Equine Studies, The Animal Health Trust, Lanwades Park, Kentford, Newmarket, SuffolkCB8 7UU, UK
T Parkin
Affiliation:
Centre for Equine Studies, The Animal Health Trust, Lanwades Park, Kentford, Newmarket, SuffolkCB8 7UU, UK
H A Snart
Affiliation:
Centre for Equine Studies, The Animal Health Trust, Lanwades Park, Kentford, Newmarket, SuffolkCB8 7UU, UK
R C Murray
Affiliation:
Centre for Equine Studies, The Animal Health Trust, Lanwades Park, Kentford, Newmarket, SuffolkCB8 7UU, UK
*
*Corresponding author: juli.walters@aht.org.uk
Get access

Abstract

There are many instructional texts for dressage management and training, but little scientific knowledge of these practices. It was hypothesized that there would be an effect of horse competition level on management and training. The objectives were to record rider, horse, management and training information from UK dressage horses and to investigate relationships between the variables. A questionnaire-based study was undertaken in all the UK-registered dressage horses. Data from 2554 respondents showed most riders in groups 7/6 with horses competed at novice medium and trained one level higher. Horses were 164–171 cm and warmbloods were the predominant breed. Age and time in competition increased in training and competing from Preliminary to Prix St George. Horses competed twice per month except at Grand Prix (once per month). Most horses had 15–30 h turnout per week. Ninety-five per cent of horses received non-dressage exercise; hacking was the most common, then lunging and jumping. Non-elite horses were significantly more likely to be hacked/jumped than elite. Horses received dressage training three to four times a week, mean warm-up of 16 min and cool-down 11 min at all levels. Mean training duration was 36 min: 21% walk, 45% trot and 32% canter. Preliminary, Novice, Intermediare I and Grand Prix horses trotted most and cantered least in training. Overall, time spent in transitions (30–39%), specific movements (30–39%), working paces (40–49%), collected (10–19%) and extended (0–9%) varied between levels; elite horses spent more time in collected and less time in working than non-elite. Overall, there were differences in training and management practices between competition levels. This information provides baseline data on which to provide future advice.

Keywords

equinedressagetrainingexercisestable management

Information

Type
Research Paper
Information
Comparative Exercise Physiology , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , May 2008 , pp. 73 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1Schöneseiffen, N (2000). A study of the losses in training time incurred by riding horses as a result of illness and the evaluation of training stress and training strain in dressage sport horses. Dissertation, Institute for Anatomy, Physiology and Hygiene, Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-University, Bonn.Google Scholar
2Murray, RC, Mann, S and Parkin, TDH (2006). Warm up in dressage competitions: association with level, competition type and final score. Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology 3(4): 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Murray, RC, Dyson, SJ, Tranquille, C and Adams, V (2006). Association of type of sport and performance level with anatomical site of orthopaedic injury diagnosis. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 36: 411–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Holmström, M, Magnusson, LE and Philipsson, J (1990). Variation in conformation of Swedish warmblood horses and conformational characteristics of elite sport horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 22(3): 186–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Back, W, Barneveld, A, Bruin, G, Schamhardt, HC and Hartman, W (1994). Kinematic detection of superior gait quality in young trotting warmbloods. Veterinary Quarterly 16(Suppl. 2): 91–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Barry, E, Desliens, F, Poirel, D, Biau, S, Lemaire, S, Rivero, JL and Langlois, B (2002). Early evaluation of dressage ability in different breeds. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 34: 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Yamano, S, Eto, D, Sugiura, T, Kai, M, Hiraga, A, Tokuriki, M and Miyata, H (2002). Effect of growth and training on muscle adaptation in Thoroughbred horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 63(10): 1408–1412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Rietbroek, NJ, Dingboom, EG and Everts, ME (2007). Muscle characteristics of Dutch warmblood foals with different genetic background at ages 6 and 12 months. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 36: 326–329.Google Scholar
9Rietbroek, NJ, Dingboom, EG, Joosten, BJ, Eizema, K and Everts, ME (2007). Effects of show jumping training on the development of locomotory muscle in young horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 68(11): 1232–1238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Murray, MJ and Eichorn, ES (1996). Effects of intermittent feed deprivation, intermittent feed deprivation with ranitidine administration, and stall confinement with ad libitum access to have on gastric ulceration in horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 57(11): 1599–1603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11McClure, SR, Carithers, DS, Gross, SJ and Murray, MJ (2005). Gastric ulcer development in horses in a simulated show or training environment. Journal of American Veterinary Medicine Association 227(5): 775–777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12White, G, McClure, SR, Sifferman, R, Holste, JE, Fleishman, C, Murray, MJ and Cramer, LG (2007). Effects of short-term light to heavy exercise on gastric ulcer development in horses and efficacy of omeprazole paste in preventing gastric ulceration. Journal of American Veterinary Medicine Association 230(11): 1680–1682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Barneveld, A and van Weeren, PR (1999). Conclusions regarding the influence of exercise on the development of the equine musculoskeletal system with special reference to osteochondrosis. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 31: 112–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14van de Lest, CH, Brama, PA and Weeren, PR (2002). The influence of exercise on the composition of developing equine joints. Biorheology 39(1-2): 183–191.Google ScholarPubMed
15Holm, I, Rosdahl, MA, Friis, A, Risberg, MA, Myklebust, G and Steen, H (2004). Effect of neuromuscular training on proprioception, balance, muscle strength, and lower limb function in female team handball players. Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine 14(2): 88–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Cressey, EM, West, CA, Tiberio, DP, Kraemer, WJ and Maresh, CM (2007). The effects of ten weeks of lower-body unstable surface training on markers of athletic performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 21(2): 561–567.Google ScholarPubMed
17Willardson, JM (2007). Core stability training: applications to sports conditioning programs. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 21(3): 979–985.Google ScholarPubMed
18German National Equestrian Federation (2003). Advanced Techniques of Dressage. English Translation. Buckingham, UK: Kenilworth Press.Google Scholar