Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-zntvd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-14T15:13:22.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Problematic usage of the internet is associated with orthorexia nervosa tendency in adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2025

Sophie Boutouis
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, The University of Chicago Medicine, USA
Jon E. Grant*
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, The University of Chicago Medicine, USA
*
Corresponding author: Jon E. Grant; Email: jongrant@uchicago.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

The link between problematic usage of the internet (PUI) and eating disorder symptoms is well-established. However, less is known about this association in the context of orthorexia nervosa (ON), an excessive preoccupation with healthy eating. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between PUI, including various problematic online behaviors, and ON tendency in a sample of US adults.

Methods

Three hundred adults completed an online survey via prolific (mean age = 37.40, 54.6% female). The survey included demographic questions, the ORTO-R to measure ON symptoms, and the Internet Severity and Activities Addiction Questionnaire (ISAAQ-10) to assess PUI and the extent of engagement in several online activities, such as gaming, shopping, social networking, cyberchondria, pornography, and cyberbullying.

Results

Women had higher ORTO-R scores than men (p < .05). ISAAQ-10 scores predicted ORTO-R scores in a regression model (β = .375, p < .001) even after controlling for age, gender, and an eating disorder diagnosis. ON risk was associated with a high engagement in cyberchondria, researching healthy food choices on the internet, cyberbullying perpetration, and online shopping.

Conclusions

Results indicate that PUI is associated with ON symptoms even after considering other predictors. Maladaptive use of nutrition and medical-related resources may play a significant role in this association. However, it remains unclear whether exposure to this content increases ON risk or if people with ON symptoms seek this information online. The directionality of this relationship is an important area for future research.

Information

Type
Original Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Orthorexia nervosa (ON) is a proposed eating disorder characterized by an intense preoccupation with healthy eating and a fixation on food quality and purity.Reference Dunn and Bratman 1 Individuals with ON follow rigid dietary rules, often eliminating entire food groups deemed unhealthy from their diets and spending an excessive amount of time planning, obtaining, and preparing their food.Reference Donini, Barrada and Barthels 2 This level of restriction results in marked distress and psychosocial or medical impairments that disrupt overall functioning.Reference Donini, Barrada and Barthels 2 For instance, individuals with ON may experience significant anxiety in social situations that involve food and thus opt to avoid these events altogether.Reference Şentürk, Güler Şentürk, Erus, Geniş and Coşar 3 They may also distance themselves from family and friends who do not adhere to their self-imposed dietary rules, leading to further isolation.Reference Koven and Abry 4 , Reference McComb and Mills 5 While ON is gaining recognition in the literature and media, it has yet to be established as a disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) or the International Classification of Diseases (ICD).

The occurrence of ON varies across populations: in the general population, the rate of ON may range from 1 to 57.6%,Reference Carpita, Nardi and Bonelli 6 , Reference Dunn, Gibbs, Whitney and Starosta 7 but in high-risk groups, such as athletes or health professionals, estimates range from 35 to 57.8%.Reference Varga, Dukay-Szabó, Túry and van Furth Eric 8 However, it must be noted that some of these studies measured ON symptoms with the ORTO-15, an instrument that has been increasingly criticized for its poor reliability and validity.Reference Barrada and Meule 9 , Reference Mitrofanova, Pummell, Martinelli and Petróczi 10 This measure fails to distinguish between pathological and non-pathological healthful eatingReference Dunn and Bratman 1 but continues to be used in ON research, resulting in questionable results. This issue, coupled with the overall lack of consensus on diagnostic criteria for ON, makes it difficult to determine the prevalence of this complex behavior.

One aspect that researchers can agree on regarding ON is that the internet may play a significant role in its development and/or maintenance.Reference Horovitz and Argyrides 11 Problematic usage of the internet (PUI)—also known as internet addiction—is an umbrella term referring to excessive engagement in online activities that results in significant psychosocial and occupational impairments.Reference Beard and Wolf 12 PUI encompasses a variety of behaviors, including gaming, shopping, gambling, social networking, engaging in cyberchondria (the repeated seeking of medical information to alleviate anxiety or distress) or pornography, streaming media, and cyberbullying.Reference Fineberg, Demetrovics and Stein 13 Internet addiction has been linked to obsessive-compulsiveReference Moretta and Buodo 14 and eating disorder symptoms,Reference Hinojo-Lucena, Aznar-Díaz, Cáceres-Reche, Trujillo-Torres and Romero-Rodríguez 15 , 16 which have significant theoretical overlap with ON.Reference Yılmaz, Karakuş, Tamam, Demirkol, Namlı and Yeşiloğlu 17 As such, PUI may also be associated with an ON risk.

Several studies have connected a high level of involvement with nutrition and fitness accounts on visual-based social media platforms (particularly Instagram) with ON symptoms.Reference Scheiber, Diehl and Karmasin 18 Reference Yurtdaş-Depboylu, Kaner and Özçakal 20 An analysis of “healthy” recipes posted on Instagram found that most of them were unbalanced and did not meet nutritional guidelines.Reference Pozo, Ezan, Moubassat and Déchelotte 21 The link between social media use and ON may be mediated by the drive for thinness and muscularity,Reference Scheiber, Diehl and Karmasin 18 attitudes toward eating,Reference Unal and Kocatepe Avcı 22 and obsessive-compulsive symptoms.Reference Kuş, Tan, Doğan and Bas 23 Additionally, social media addiction has been positively correlated with ON symptoms.Reference Yurtdaş-Depboylu, Kaner and Özçakal 20 , Reference Yılmazel 24

There is a growing concern, however, about how other forms of PUI (outside of social media use) may affect the development and maintenance of eating disorders. Indeed, previous research has connected compulsive shopping,Reference Claes, Bijttebier, Mitchell, de Zwaan and Mueller 25 , Reference Harnish, Gump, Bridges, Slack and Rottschaefer 26 excessive pornography use,Reference Gewirtz-Meydan and Spivak-Lavi 27 , Reference Spivak-Lavi and Gewirtz-Meydan 28 and cyberbullying perpetrationReference Cheng, Chu and Ganson 29 with eating disorder symptoms. In the context of ON, 2 studies have examined its relationship with cyberchondria. Atsizata and Cangöl SögütReference Atsizata and Sögüt 30 found that among nurses, cyberchondria increased their risk of ON. However, in a sample of pregnant women, cyberchondria and ON levels were unrelated.Reference Yıldız, Gökmen, Güler and Demirhan 31 This relationship in a community sample is unclear.

Additionally, no studies have examined the associations between “global” internet use problems or other online activities and ON. These gaps in the literature are important to fill because 96% of US adults use the internet, 32 and various facets of internet usage overlap. For instance, a recent review supported the interaction of several digital hazards, including cyberbullying, exposure to pro-eating disorder content on social media, and online gaming, with preexisting risk factors (eg, thin-ideal internalization) to predict eating disorder symptoms and clinical manifestations of eating disorders.Reference Ioannidis and Chamberlain 33 In the case of ON, someone may excessively seek nutritional information on social media and engage with fitness accounts that post oversexualized content while leaving harmful comments or bullying other users. These aspects of PUI may have distinctive influences on orthorexic symptoms. As such, the current study aimed to determine the association between PUI (including gaming, shopping, social networking, cyberchondria, pornography, and cyberbullying) and ON tendency in a large, non-clinical sample of US adults. We also investigated demographic correlates of ON to add to the growing ON literature. Based on existing research, we hypothesized that PUI would predict ON risk, and a high engagement in social networking (particularly health-related content) and cyberchondria would be more strongly associated with ON tendency than other facets of PUI.

Methods

Participants

A total of 300 adults were recruited to complete an online survey about online behaviors and mental health via Prolific. Subjects had to be 18 years of age or older, currently residing in the United States, able to understand English, and capable of providing informed consent to participate. Participants were excluded if they were unable to understand or undertake study procedures.

Procedures

Subjects completed an online survey via REDCap. They were first required to review the Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved informed consent, in which they could accept or deny participation in the survey. The survey asserted that all responses would be kept confidential and that no personally identifying information would be collected. Participants were compensated $12 for their participation. Data was collected on 01/09/2024.

Measures

The online survey collected demographic information (age, gender, race, etc.) and mental health history. Subjects were asked if they had ever been diagnosed with an eating disorder (including anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or binge eating disorder) or obsessive-compulsive disorder, as ON has several similarities to these conditions.Reference Yılmaz, Karakuş, Tamam, Demirkol, Namlı and Yeşiloğlu 17 Data on active substance and psychotropic medication use were also collected, with current nicotine or alcohol use considered as any use within the past 30 days.

To assess ON symptoms, all participants completed the ORTO-R. The ORTO-R is a revised version of the ORTO-15 that consists of 6 questions (selected from the original scale) that best reflect thoughts and behaviors associated with ON.Reference Rogoza and Donini 34 The new version of the scale was created based on a reassessment of the original data used to develop the ORTO-15, and it appears to be a more reliable toolReference Rogoza and Donini 34 that has been validated in several studies of diverse populations.Reference Rogoza and Donini 34 Reference Vaccari, Cutino and Luisi 37 The 6 items assess the core features of ON, including an excessive preoccupation with healthy eating, a significant effort to eat healthily, food-related emotional distress, and impairments in social functioning.Reference Rogoza and Donini 34 The ORTO-R measures ON tendency in a dimensional manner, eliminating a categorical diagnosis. Subjects were asked to respond to each question on a scale of 1 = Never to 5 = Always (eg, Are your rigid and restrictive dietary choices conditioned by your worry about your health status?). Higher scores indicate more severe ON symptoms. The ORTO-R showed good reliability in the present study (α = 0.809).

Participants also completed the Internet Severity and Activities Addiction Questionnaire (ISAAQ-10), which consists of 2 components that evaluate the severity of internet use and engagement in various online activities, respectively. In the first component, subjects were asked to respond to each question on a scale of 0 = Not at all to 5 = All the time (eg, How often do you find yourself losing track of time while engaging in an internet-related activity?). Higher scores indicate greater problematic internet use, with Ioannidis et al.Reference Ioannidis, Tiego and Lutz 38 proposing a cutoff score of 30 out of 50 as indicating “high PUI.” The ISAAQ-10 demonstrated excellent reliability in the present study (α = 0.903). The second component (part B) prompted participants to indicate how often they engaged in certain online activities during the last 6 mo. These activities included browsing or surfing the web, online gaming with other players, online shopping, social networking, researching medical information (cyberchondria), engaging in cybersex or viewing pornography, streaming music or videos on a platform, and cyberbullying others. The same scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Rarely, 2 = Occasionally, 3 = Frequently, 4 = Very often, 5 = All the time) was used. Histograms revealed that subjects’ responses to most of the questions in part B clustered around the middle values of the scale. Based on the normal curves, participants were divided into 2 groups (those who chose values greater than or less than the means) to ensure that adequate sample sizes were used in the analyses.

To explore potential expressions of ON-like behaviors on the internet, subjects were asked the following yes or no questions:

  1. 1. Do you often search for information about healthy foods (eg, research nutritional information of the food you eat, look for healthy recipes) on the internet?

  2. 2. Do you often eat while engaging in an internet-related behavior?

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Version 29.0. Between-group differences in continuous variables were tested using independent samples t-tests, analyses of variance (ANOVAs), or analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs) while controlling for covariates. Effect sizes were calculated in the form of Cohen’s d for t tests (0.2 = small, 0.5 = medium, 0.8 = large) and eta squared and partial eta squared for ANOVAs and ANCOVAs, respectively (0.01 = small, 0.06 = medium, 0.14 = large). Pearson correlation analyses were performed to assess the association between continuous variables. The robustness of significant correlations was probed by a multiple linear regression. A two-sided p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant in all analyses.

Ethics

The Institutional Review Board of the University of Chicago approved the study and the consent statement. The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

Results

A total of 300 adults participated in the study. Ten subjects did not complete the ORTO-R and were thus excluded from the analyses. As such, the final sample consisted of 290 adults (Mage = 37.40, SD = 12.61), including 155 women, 120 men, 9 transgender or non-binary individuals, and 6 people who did not report their gender.

Descriptive statistics of the sample are presented in Table 1. Most participants identified as white or Caucasian (69.2%), had a college degree (47.0%), were single (36.6%) or married or engaged (36.9%), identified as heterosexual (78.5%), and did not report active nicotine (82.0%) or psychotropic medication (76.0%) use. Respondents reported an average of 1.22 (SD = 1.49) diagnosed psychiatric conditions. The mean score on the ISAAQ-10 was 18.48 (SD = 9.29), and 12.8% of the sample met criteria for PUI.

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics for a Sample of 290 Adults

Subjects scored an average of 14.52 (SD = 4.95) on the ORTO-R, with women scoring higher than men (M = 15.10, SD = 4.93 versus M = 13.71, SD = 4.90, respectively; t(273) = −2.324, p = .021). Those who reported taking a psychotropic medication had higher ORTO-R scores than those in the comparison group (M = 15.86, SD = 5.47 versus M = 14.06, SD = 4.69, respectively; t(286) = −2.664, p = .008). Additionally, participants who had been diagnosed with an eating disorder (M = 20.83, SD = 3.97), scored higher on the ORTO-R than those who did not report such a diagnosis (M = 14.38, SD = 4.89; t(288) = −3.209, p = .001). ORTO-R scores did not differ between subjects based on all other demographic characteristics, including race, education, relationship status, sexual orientation, nicotine use, alcohol use, or a history of obsessive-compulsive disorder (see Table 2).

Table 2. Differences in Adults’ Orthorexia Nervosa Tendency According to Their Descriptive Statistics

Bolded characteristics indicate a statistically significant difference in variable distribution between groups (p < .05).

ORTO-R scores were higher in participants who did (M = 17.11, SD = 4.77) versus those who did not meet criteria for PUI (M = 14.16, SD = 4.91; F(1, 270) = 7.819, p = .006). Moreover, there were several significant findings in relation to online activities. First, subjects who shopped online “frequently to all the time” (M = 15.44, SD = 4.94) had higher ORTO-R scores than those who shopped online “occasionally to not at all” (M = 14.10, SD = 4.91; F(1, 278) = 5.210, p = .023). The same results were found regarding cyberchondria (M = 15.48, SD = 14.35 versus M = 14.35, SD = 5.06, respectively; F(1, 278) = 4.181, p = .042). Participants who often researched healthy food choices on the internet (M = 17.61, SD = 4.50) had higher ORTO-R scores than those in the comparison group (M = 13.04, SD = 4.47; F(1, 276) = 55.988, p < .001). This variable had the largest effect size (ηpReference Donini, Barrada and Barthels 2 = .169) on the dependent variable. Lastly, subjects who cyberbullied others to any extent (M = 17.05, SD = 4.31) scored higher on the ORTO-R than those who reported no cyberbullying (M = 14.37, SD = 4.95; F(1, 278) = 8.724, p = .003). There was no difference in ON tendency among participants with different rates of other online behaviors, including social networking (see Table 3).

Table 3. Differences in Adults’ Orthorexia Nervosa Tendency According to Online Behaviors While Controlling for Age and Gender

Bolded characteristics indicate a statistically significant difference in variable distribution between groups (p < .05).

Abbreviation: PUI, problematic usage of the internet

Age was negatively correlated with ISAAQ-10 scores (r = −.352, p < .001) and ORTO-R scores (r = −.155, p = .009), and ISAAQ-10 scores were positively correlated with ORTO-R scores (r = .411, p < .001). After controlling for age, gender (0 = male, 1 = female), and an eating disorder diagnosis (0 = no, 1 = yes) in a multiple linear regression, ISAAQ-10 scores were still associated with ORTO-R scores (t = 6.336, p < .001). While the overall utility of the model was significant (F(4, 260) = 16.505, p < .001, R2 = .203), age and gender did not significantly contribute to the model (see Table 4).

Table 4. Multiple Linear Regression Evaluating Predictors of Orthorexia Nervosa Tendency

Bolded characteristics are statistically significant predictors of the outcome variable (p < .05).

Abbreviation: ISAAQ-10, Internet Severity and Activities Addiction Questionnaire.

Discussion

This is the first study to investigate the relationship between PUI and various online activities and ON tendency. In our sample, the average ORTO-R score was 14.52. This is consistent with similar studies: Dell’Osso et al.Reference Dell’Osso, Cremone and Chiarantini 39 reported a mean ORTO-R score of 12.726 in a sample of college students, and in a combined clinical and non-clinical sample, Vaccari et al.Reference Vaccari, Cutino and Luisi 37 found an average ORTO-R score of 16.6. Additionally, we found that women had a higher ON tendency than men. While some studies did not detect gender differences in orthorexic tendencies,Reference Anastasiades and Argyrides 40 , Reference Bundros, Clifford, Silliman and Neyman Morris 41 our results are corroborated by other studies.Reference Atsizata and Sögüt 30 , Reference Dell’Osso, Cremone and Chiarantini 39 , Reference Hanras, Dorard and Boujut 42 The increased risk of ON among women may be explained by the similarities between anorexia and orthorexia nervosa,Reference Dell’Osso, Carpita and Muti 43 as women are more likely to be diagnosed with anorexia nervosa than men.Reference van Eeden, van Hoeken and Hoek 44 Indeed, we found that subjects with an eating disorder and those on psychotropic medications had higher ORTO-R scores than those in the comparison groups. These findings support the growing literature that ON may contain more features of an eating disorder than obsessive-compulsive disorderReference Cosh, Olson and Tully 45 , Reference Hallit, Azzi, Malaeb and Obeid 46 and may be comorbid with conditions that warrant medication usage.

While the mean ISAAQ-10 score in our sample (18.48) is slightly lower than what has been reported in the literature,Reference Ioannidis, Tiego and Lutz 38 the rate of PUI among our participants (12.8%) is the same as that in the global population.Reference Meng, Cheng and Li 47 Additionally, we found that as subjects’ ages increased, their risk of internet addiction and ON decreased. This is consistent with previous research.Reference Bóna, Erdész and Túry 48 , Reference Devine, Ogletree, Shah and Katz 49 ON tendency (measured via ORTO-R scores) was significantly higher in those with than those without PUI, even after controlling for age and gender. Moreover, while considering age, gender, and an eating disorder diagnosis as covariates, a multiple linear regression revealed that ISAAQ-10 scores were significant positive predictors of ORTO-R scores. The mechanisms of this association are unclear, but perhaps anxiety, compulsivity, or a need for control play a significant role, as one may control their diet to cope with other areas of their life that feel uncontrollable (eg, difficulties with regulating internet use). Nevertheless, our finding demonstrates that “global” internet use problems are associated with ON tendency, even after adjusting for potential confounders. This is a valuable contribution to the literature, which has predominantly focused on social media usage in relation to ON.

Interestingly, we did not detect a difference in ON symptoms between subjects who used social media at different frequencies. This supports the idea that ON risk may be more impacted by the type of content viewed on social media than the duration of use.Reference Usta Ulutaş and Okan Bakır 50 Indeed, we found that among all the online activities examined in our study, those who often used the internet to research the nutritional information of their food or look for healthy recipes had the highest ORTO-R scores. The effect size of performing this activity often (ηp Reference Donini, Barrada and Barthels 2 = .169) on ORTO-R scores was large, suggesting a strong association. However, the directionality of this relationship is unclear. Does exposure to clean eating-related content increase one’s risk of ON, or do people with ON symptoms seek out this information online? Future research adopting a longitudinal design is needed to get at this question.

In a similar vein, participants who engaged in high levels of cyberchondria had more ON symptoms than those in the comparison group. This result replicates that of Atsizata and Cangöl Sögüt,Reference Atsizata and Sögüt 30 who found that cyberchondria increased nurses’ risk of ON, in a large community sample of adults. This is concerning given that around 60% of U.S. adults use the internet to search for medical information,Reference Wang and Cohen 51 but most of it (including nutritional information) is incorrect and of poor quality.Reference Daraz, Morrow and Ponce 52 , Reference Denniss, Lindberg and McNaughton 53 As more and more people turn to the internet, which has a considerable amount of misinformation, for guidance about their health, the risk of ON may increase. While again, the directionality of this association is uncertain, it underscores a need for more research on cyberchondria and ON in this digital age.

Apart from excessive engagement with health-related content, our study found that subjects who shopped online “frequently or more” and those who cyberbullied others had higher ORTO-R scores than those in the comparison groups. This is in line with previous research that has suggested overlap between compulsive shoppingReference Claes, Bijttebier, Mitchell, de Zwaan and Mueller 25 , Reference Harnish, Gump, Bridges, Slack and Rottschaefer 26 and cyberbullying perpetrationReference Cheng, Chu and Ganson 29 with eating disorders. Indeed, one study found that low self-esteem, which predicts greater cyberbullying,Reference Brewer and Kerslake 54 also plays a role in the relationship between compulsive shopping and disordered eating.Reference De Pasquale, Morando and Platania 55 While low self-esteem is a theorized risk factor of ON,Reference Mahfoud, Pardini and Mróz 56 future research should investigate the mechanisms of the association between various facets of PUI and ON.

This study has some limitations. First, the ORTO-R measures ON symptom severity in a dimensional manner, so there is no cutoff score available to indicate ON. Thus, most of our analyses were limited to correlations, and the clinical significance of our results is unclear. Yet, since there are still no fixed diagnostic criteria for ON, our findings signify associations between internet addiction and ON within the current scope of research. Next, the cross-sectional design of this study limited our ability to make causal connections. In a previous longitudinal study, PUI was cross-sectionally correlated with but not longitudinally predictive of eating disorder symptoms when considering socio-contextual variables,Reference Ioannidis, Hook and Wiedemann 57 so we emphasize that our results do not suggest that PUI may cause ON. Additionally, all data were self-reported, which may be inaccurate due to social desirability and recall biases. Data regarding psychiatric diagnoses and PUI, in particular, would have been best verified by a clinician-administered diagnostic interview. Lastly, while Prolific has been shown to yield high-quality data,Reference Douglas, Ewell and Brauer 58 , Reference Eyal, David, Andrew, Zak and Ekaterina 59 participants on Prolific may be unrepresentative of the population. In our sample, we had an approximately equal division of genders, but the majority of our participants were Caucasian.

Conclusion

Our results indicate a higher prevalence of ON symptoms among women, individuals who have been diagnosed with an eating disorder, and those who take at least one psychotropic medication. Additionally, we reveal an association between broad internet use problems (including but not limited to social media use) and ON tendency. PUI was still a significant predictor of ON tendency after controlling for age, gender, and a history of an eating disorder. PUI in the form of excessive engagement with health-related content may drive this association; however, other online activities, including cyberbullying and compulsive shopping, may also be involved and warrant more attention in the literature. Further research is needed to establish the directionality and mechanisms of these associations.

Author contribution

Conceptualization: S.B.; Funding acquisition: J.E.G.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Disclosures

Dr. Grant has received research grants from Janssen and Biohaven Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Grant receives yearly compensation from Springer Publishing for acting as an Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Gambling Studies and has received royalties from Oxford University Press, American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., Norton Press, and McGraw Hill. Ms. Boutouis reports no conflicts.

References

Dunn, TM, Bratman, S. On orthorexia nervosa: a review of the literature and proposed diagnostic criteria. Eat Behav. 2016;21:1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.12.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donini, LM, Barrada, JR, Barthels, F, et al. Correction: a consensus document on definition and diagnostic criteria for orthorexia nervosa. Eat Weight Disord Stud Anorexia Bulimia Obes. 2023;28(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-023-01599-4Google ScholarPubMed
Şentürk, E, Güler Şentürk, B, Erus, S, Geniş, B, Coşar, B. Dietary patterns and eating behaviors on the border between healthy and pathological orthorexia. Eat Weight Disord. 2022;2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-022-01457-9Google Scholar
Koven, N, Abry, A. The clinical basis of orthorexia nervosa: emerging perspectives. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11(1):385. https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s61665CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McComb, SE, Mills, JS. Orthorexia nervosa: a review of psychosocial risk factors. Appetite. 2019;140:5075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.05.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpita, B, Nardi, B, Bonelli, C, et al. Prevalence of orthorexia nervosa in clinical and non-clinical populations: a systematic review. CNS Spectrums. 2024;2:121. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1092852924002256Google Scholar
Dunn, TM, Gibbs, J, Whitney, N, Starosta, A. Prevalence of orthorexia nervosa is less than 1%: data from a US sample. Eat Weight Disord. 2017;22(1):185192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-016-0258-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varga, M, Dukay-Szabó, S, Túry, F, van Furth Eric, F. Evidence and gaps in the literature on orthorexia nervosa. Eat Weight Disord. 2013;18(2):103111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-013-0026-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrada, JR, Meule, A. Orthorexia nervosa: research based on invalid measures is invalid. J Glob Health. 2024;14. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.03007Google ScholarPubMed
Mitrofanova, E, Pummell, E, Martinelli, L, Petróczi, A. Does ORTO-15 produce valid data for “Orthorexia Nervosa”? A mixed-method examination of participants’ interpretations of the fifteen test items. Eat Weight Disord. 2020;26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-020-00919-2Google ScholarPubMed
Horovitz, O, Argyrides, M. Orthorexia and orthorexia nervosa: a comprehensive examination of prevalence, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Nutrients. 2023;15(17):38513851. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15173851CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beard, KW, Wolf, EM. Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2001;4(3):377383. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493101300210286CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fineberg, N, Demetrovics, Z, Stein, D, et al. Manifesto for a European research network into problematic usage of the internet. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018;28(11):12321246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretta, T, Buodo, G. The relationship between affective and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in internet use disorder. Front Psychol. 2021;12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700518Google ScholarPubMed
Hinojo-Lucena, FJ, Aznar-Díaz, I, Cáceres-Reche, MP, Trujillo-Torres, JM, Romero-Rodríguez, JM. Problematic internet use as a predictor of eating disorders in students: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Nutrients. 2019;11(9):2151. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11092151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Problematic usage of the internet and eating disorder and related psychopathology: a multifaceted, systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;125:569581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yılmaz, H, Karakuş, G, Tamam, L, Demirkol, ME, Namlı, Z, Yeşiloğlu, C. Association of orthorexic tendencies with obsessive-compulsive symptoms, eating attitudes and exercise. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020;16:30353044. https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s280047CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheiber, R, Diehl, S, Karmasin, M. Socio-cultural power of social media on orthorexia nervosa: an empirical investigation on the mediating role of thin-ideal and muscular internalization, appearance comparison, and body dissatisfaction. Appetite. 2023;185:106522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.106522CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, PG, Lefevre, CE. Instagram use is linked to increased symptoms of orthorexia nervosa. Eat Weight Disord. 2017;22(2):277284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-017-0364-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yurtdaş-Depboylu, G, Kaner, G, Özçakal, S. The association between social media addiction and orthorexia nervosa, eating attitudes, and body image among adolescents. Eat Weight Disord. 2022;27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-022-01521-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pozo, GD, Ezan, P, Moubassat, M, Déchelotte, P. Does so-called “healthy” content on Instagram display balanced recipes? A pilot study in relation with the risk of unhealthy eating patterns in social network users. Appetite. 2024;200:107542107542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107542CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unal, GA, Kocatepe Avcı, U. The mediating role of attitudes towards eating in the relationship between compulsive instagram use and orthorexia in adults. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024;17:42374248. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s491268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuş, Y, Tan, E, Doğan, O, Bas, A. From likes to obsessions: the mediating role of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in the relationship between social media addiction and orthorexia nervosa. J Clin Psychiatry. 2025;28(1):715. https://doi.org/10.5505/kpd.2025.34979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yılmazel, G. Orthorexia tendency and social media addiction among candidate doctors and nurses. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2021;57(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12758CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claes, L, Bijttebier, P, Mitchell, JE, de Zwaan, M, Mueller, A. The relationship between compulsive buying, eating disorder symptoms, and temperament in a sample of female students. Compr Psychiatry. 2011;52(1):5055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harnish, RJ, Gump, JT, Bridges, KR, Slack, FJ, Rottschaefer, KM. Compulsive buying: the impact of attitudes toward body image. Eating disorders, and physical appearance investment. Psychol Rep. 2018;122(5):16321650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118789042CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gewirtz-Meydan, A, Spivak-Lavi, Z. The association between problematic pornography use and eating disorder symptoms among heterosexual and sexual minority men. Body Image. 2023;45:284295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.03.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spivak-Lavi, Z, Gewirtz-Meydan, A. Why do women with disordered eating engage in sex? The mediating role of sexual motivations in the association between disordered eating behaviors and attitudes and sexual dysfunction. Arch Sex Behav. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02463-9Google Scholar
Cheng, C, Chu, J, Ganson, KT, et al. Cyberbullying and eating disorder symptoms in US early adolescents. Int J Eat Disord. 2023;56(12). https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24034CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atsizata, M, Sögüt, SC. The relationship between orthorexia nervosa and cyberchondria levels in nurses: a cross-sectional study*. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2024;48:3035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2024.01.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yıldız, M, Gökmen, BD, Güler, S, Demirhan, A. Investigation of the relationship between body image, orthorexia nervosa and cyberchondria in pregnant women. Anatol J Health Res. 2024. https://doi.org/10.61534/anatoljhr.1435910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center. Internet/broadband fact sheet. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. 2024. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/Google Scholar
Ioannidis, K, Chamberlain, SR. Digital hazards for feeding and eating: what we know and what we don’t. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2021;23(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-021-01271-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogoza, R, Donini, LM. Introducing ORTO-R: A revision of ORTO-15 Based on the Assessment of Original Data. Eat Weight Disorder. 2021;26(3):887895.10.1007/s40519-020-00924-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brytek-Matera, A, Obeid, S, Donini, LM, et al. Psychometric properties of the ORTO-R in a community-based sample of women and men from Poland. J Eat Disord. 2023;11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00734-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogoza, R, Mhanna, M, Gerges, S, Donini, LM, Obeid, S, Hallit, S. Validation of the Arabic version of the ORTO-R among a sample of Lebanese young adults. Eat Weight Disord. 2022;27(6):20732080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-021-01350-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaccari, G, Cutino, A, Luisi, F, et al. Is orthorexia nervosa a feature of obsessive–compulsive disorder? A multicentric, controlled study. Eat Weight Disord 2021;26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-021-01114-738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ioannidis, K, Tiego, J, Lutz, N, et al. Internet severity and activities addiction questionnaire (ISAAQ): psychometrics of item response theory and clustering of online activities. Compr Psychiatry. 2023;122:152366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2023.152366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dell’Osso, L, Cremone, IM, Chiarantini, I, et al. Investigating orthorexia nervosa with the ORTO-R in a sample of university students with or without subthreshold autism spectrum: focus on dietary habits and gender differences. Front Psych.. 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.900880Google ScholarPubMed
Anastasiades, E, Argyrides, M. Exploring the role of positive body image in healthy orthorexia and orthorexia nervosa: a gender comparison. Appetite. 2023;106523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.106523CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bundros, J, Clifford, D, Silliman, K, Neyman Morris, M. Prevalence of Orthorexia nervosa among college students based on Bratman’s test and associated tendencies. Appetite 2016;101:8694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.144CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanras, E, Dorard, G, Boujut, E. Existe-t-il un effet de genre dans l’expression des orthorexies nerveuse et saine? Une analyse des comportements alimentaires. Can J Behav Sci Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement. 2024;31. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000422Google Scholar
Dell’Osso, L, Carpita, B, Muti, D, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of orthorexia nervosa in a sample of university students in Italy. Eat Weight Disord. 2017;23(1):5565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-017-0460-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Eeden, AE, van Hoeken, D, Hoek, HW. Incidence, prevalence and mortality of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Curr Opin Psychiatr. 2021;34(6):515524. https://doi.org/10.1097/yco.0000000000000739CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosh, S, Olson, J, Tully, PJ. Exploration of orthorexia nervosa and diagnostic overlap with eating disorders, anorexia nervosa and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Int J Eat Disord. 2023;24. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24051Google Scholar
Hallit, S, Azzi, V, Malaeb, D, Obeid, S. Any overlap between orthorexia nervosa and obsessive–compulsive disorder in Lebanese adults? Results of a cross-sectional study and validation of the 12-item and 4-item obsessive–compulsive inventory (OCI-12 and OCI-4). BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04119-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meng, SQ, Cheng, JL, Li, YY, et al. Global prevalence of digital addiction in general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2022;92(92):102128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102128CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bóna, E, Erdész, A, Túry, F. Low self-esteem predicts orthorexia nervosa, mediated by spiritual attitudes among frequent exercisers. Eat Weight Disord. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-020-01095-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devine, D, Ogletree, AM, Shah, P, Katz, B. Internet addiction, cognitive, and dispositional factors among US adults. Comput Human Behav Rep. 2022;6:100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usta Ulutaş, P, Okan Bakır, B. The type of social media is a greater influential factor for orthorexia nervosa than the duration: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21335-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X, Cohen, RA. Health information technology use among adults: United States, July–December 2022. Published online October. 2023;31. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc:133700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daraz, L, Morrow, AS, Ponce, OJ, et al. Can patients trust online health information? A meta-narrative systematic review addressing the quality of health information on the internet. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(9):18841891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05109-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denniss, E, Lindberg, R, McNaughton, SA. Quality and accuracy of online nutrition-related information: a systematic review of content analysis studies. Public Health Nutr. 2023;26(7):113. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980023000873CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brewer, G, Kerslake, J. Cyberbullying, self-esteem, empathy and loneliness. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;48(1):255260.10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Pasquale, C, Morando, M, Platania, S, et al. The roles of anxiety and self-esteem in the risk of eating disorders and compulsive buying behavior. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(23):16245. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahfoud, D, Pardini, S, Mróz, M, et al. Profiling orthorexia nervosa in young adults: the role of obsessive behaviour, perfectionism, and self-esteem. J Eat Disord. 2023;11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00915-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannidis, K, Hook, RW, Wiedemann, A, et al. Associations between COVID-19 pandemic impact, dimensions of behavior and eating disorders: a longitudinal UK-based study. Compr Psychiatry. 2022;115:152304 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2022.152304CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas, BD, Ewell, PJ, Brauer, M. Data quality in online human-subjects research: comparisons between MTurk Prolific, CloudResearch, Qualtrics, and SONA. PLoS One. 2023;18(3):e0279720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279720CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eyal, P, David, R, Andrew, G, Zak, E, Ekaterina, D. Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behav Res Methods. 2021;54 https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01694-3Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics for a Sample of 290 Adults

Figure 1

Table 2. Differences in Adults’ Orthorexia Nervosa Tendency According to Their Descriptive Statistics

Figure 2

Table 3. Differences in Adults’ Orthorexia Nervosa Tendency According to Online Behaviors While Controlling for Age and Gender

Figure 3

Table 4. Multiple Linear Regression Evaluating Predictors of Orthorexia Nervosa Tendency