Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-lqrcg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-18T19:44:26.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A machine learning technique for estimating the zeta potential of clay minerals under various brine conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2025

Yanqi Huang
Affiliation:
Henan Sixth Geological Brigade Co., Ltd , Zhengzhou Henan, 450000, China
Ayat Hussein Adhab*
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Al-Zahrawi University College , Karbala, Iraq
Vicky Jain*
Affiliation:
Marwadi University Research Center, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Marwadi University , Rajkot 360003, Gujarat, India
Abhinav Kumar*
Affiliation:
A Sharda School of Engineering and Sciences, Sharda University, Knowledge Park III, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh-201310, India. B Department of Mechanical Engineering, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore 641021, India
Roopashree R
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University) , Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Aditya Kashyap
Affiliation:
Centre for Research Impact & Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University , Rajpura, 140401, Punjab, India
Suman Saini
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Chandigarh Engineering College, Chandigarh Group of Colleges-Jhanjeri , Mohali1 40307, Punjab, India
Pushpa Negi Bhakuni
Affiliation:
A Department of Allied Science, Graphic Era Hill University , Bhimtal, India B Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Morug Salih Mahdi
Affiliation:
College of MLT, Ahl Al Bayt University , Iraq
Aseel Salah Mansoor
Affiliation:
Gilgamesh Ahliya University , Baghdad, Iraq
Usama Kadem Radi
Affiliation:
College of Pharmacy, National University of Science and Technology , Dhi Qar, 64001, Iraq
Nasr Saadoun Abd
Affiliation:
Medical technical college, Al-Farahidi University , Iraq
Mamurakhon Toshpulatova
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Teaching Methods in Primary Education, Tashkent State Pedagogical University, Bunyodkor street 27, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Mehrdad Mottaghi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Chemistry, Kabul University , Kabul, Afghanistan
*
Corresponding authors: Mehrdad Mottaghi, Yanqi Huang, and Vicky Jain; Emails: mmottaghi41@gmail.com; hyq19950817@163.com; vicky.jain@marwadieducation.edu.in
Corresponding authors: Mehrdad Mottaghi, Yanqi Huang, and Vicky Jain; Emails: mmottaghi41@gmail.com; hyq19950817@163.com; vicky.jain@marwadieducation.edu.in
Corresponding authors: Mehrdad Mottaghi, Yanqi Huang, and Vicky Jain; Emails: mmottaghi41@gmail.com; hyq19950817@163.com; vicky.jain@marwadieducation.edu.in

Abstract

Zeta potential plays a crucial role in determining the wettability and stability of clay particles in porous media, impacting their behavior when interacting with fluids. The present study aimed to address the problem of accurate estimation of zeta potential values for diverse clay particles within various brine samples using advanced machine learning techniques. Methods including decision tree, random forest, adaptive boosting, K-nearest neighbors, convolutional neural networks, and ensemble learning were employed to predict zeta potential based on input parameters such as clay type (kaolinite, chlorite, illite, and smectite), total dissolved solids, pH, and ionic strength. The leverage method was used to identify outliers within the dataset, while a sensitivity analysis quantified the influence of input factors. The training process employed k-fold cross-validation to minimize overfitting. Results revealed adaptive boosting as the most effective approach, achieving high prediction accuracy and minimal error values. Sensitivity analysis identified pH as the dominant factor reducing zeta potential magnitude, while ionic strength and total dissolved solids enhanced zeta potential. The findings contribute significantly to understanding clay–fluid interactions and provide a robust computational framework for industrial applications.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Clay Minerals Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aghdam, S.K.-y., Kazemi, A., & Ahmadi, M. (2021). A laboratory study of a novel bio-based nonionic surfactant to mitigate clay swelling. Petroleum, 7, 178187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2020.09.002Google Scholar
Aghdam, S.K.-y., Kazemi, A., & Ahmadi, M. (2023a). Studying the effect of various surfactants on the possibility and intensity of fine migration during low-salinity water flooding in clay-rich sandstones. Results in Engineering, 18, 101149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101149Google Scholar
Aghdam, S.K.-y., Kazemi, A., Ahmadi, M., & Ghale, S.P. (2023b). Thermodynamic modeling of saponin adsorption behavior on sandstone rocks: an experimental study. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 48, 94619476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-07552-4Google Scholar
Ali, R., Chuah, J.H., Talip, M.S.A., Mokhtar, N., & Shoaib, M.A. (2022). Structural crack detection using deep convolutional neural networks. Automation in Construction, 133, 103989.Google Scholar
Amirruddin, A.D., Muharam, F.M., Ismail, M.H., Tan, N.P., & Ismail, M.F. (2022). Synthetic Minority Over-sampling TEchnique (SMOTE) and Logistic Model Tree (LMT)-adaptive boosting algorithms for classifying imbalanced datasets of nutrient and chlorophyll sufficiency levels of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) using spectroradiometers and unmanned aerial vehicles. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 193, 106646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106646Google Scholar
Belgrana, F.Z., Benamrane, N., Hamaida, M.A., Chaabani, A.M., & Taleb-Ahmed, A. (2021). Network intrusion detection system using neural network and condensed nearest neighbors with selection of NSL-KDD influencing features. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence System (IoTaIS).Google Scholar
Bemani, A., Madani, M., & Kazemi, A. (2023). Machine learning-based estimation of nano-lubricants viscosity in different operating conditions. Fuel, 352, 129102.Google Scholar
Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24, 123140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058655Google Scholar
Cao, D., Zeng, L., Gomez-Rivas, E., Gong, L., Liu, G., Lu, G., & Bons, P.D. (2024). Correction of linear fracture density and error analysis using underground borehole data. Journal of Structural Geology, 184, 105152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105152Google Scholar
Desai, M., & Shah, M. (2021). An anatomization on breast cancer detection and diagnosis employing multi-layer perceptron neural network (MLP) and convolutional neural network (CNN). Clinical eHealth, 4, 111.Google Scholar
Fang, T., Ren, F., Wang, B., Hou, J., & Wiercigroch, M. (2025). Multi-scale mechanics of submerged particle impact drilling. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 285, 109838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.109838Google Scholar
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R.E. (1996). Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference. 9 pp.Google Scholar
Galal, S.K., Ahmed Elgibaly, A., & Kamel Elsayed, S. (2016). Formation damage due to fines migration and its remedial methods. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 25, 515524.Google Scholar
Gan, B., Li, Z., Huo, W., Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Fan, R., … & He, Y. (2025). Phase transitions of CH4 hydrates in mud-bearing sediments with oceanic laminar distribution: mechanical response and stabilization-type evolution. Fuel, 380, 133185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133185Google Scholar
Gheytanzadeh, M., Baghban, A., Habibzadeh, S., Esmaeili, A., Abida, O., Mohaddespour, A., & Munir, M.T. (2021). Towards estimation of CO2 adsorption on highly porous MOF-based adsorbents using gaussian process regression approach. Scientific Reports, 11, 15710.Google Scholar
Gheytanzadeh, M., Baghban, A., Habibzadeh, S., Jabbour, K., Esmaeili, A., Mohaddespour, A., & Abida, O. (2022). An insight into tetracycline photocatalytic degradation by MOFs using the artificial intelligence technique. Scientific Reports, 12, 6615.Google Scholar
Ghorbani, H., Ghorbani, P., Ghorbani, S., Khlghatyan, N., Babayan, B.G., & Koczy, A.V. (2022). A Robust Approach for Estimation of the Bone Age. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10036283Google Scholar
Ghorbani, H., Krasnikova, A., Ghorbani, P., Ghorbani, S., Hovhannisyan, H. S., Minasyan, A., … & Azodinia, M. (2023). Prediction of Heart Disease Based on Robust Artificial Intelligence Techniques. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10417981Google Scholar
Guleria, P., & Sood, M. (2023). Explainable AI and machine learning: performance evaluation and explainability of classifiers on educational data mining inspired career counseling. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 10811116.Google Scholar
Hamza, A., Hussein, I.A., Al-Marri, M.J., Mahmoud, M., & Shawabkeh, R. (2021). Impact of clays on CO2 adsorption and enhanced gas recovery in sandstone reservoirs. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 106, 103286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103286Google Scholar
Hashemi, A. Borazjani, S. Dang-Le, B., Yin Loi, G., Nguyen Cao, C., Badalyan, A., and Bedrikovetsky, P. (2022). Formation damage by fines breakage and migration. In: SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, p. D011S002R006.Google Scholar
Hua, L., Tian, Y., Gui, Y., Liu, W., & Wu, W. (2025). Semi-analytical study of pile–soil interaction on a permeable pipe pile subjected to rheological consolidation of clayey soils. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 49, 10581074. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3915Google Scholar
Itano, F., de Sousa, M.A.d.A., & Del-Moral-Hernandez, E. (2018). Extending MLP ANN hyper-parameters Optimization by using Genetic Algorithm. 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 8–13 July 2018Google Scholar
Kang, Y., Tan, Q., You, L., Zhang, X., Xu, C., & Lin, C. (2019). Experimental investigation on size degradation of bridging material in drilling fluids. Powder Technology, 342, 5466.Google Scholar
Kazemi, A., Khezerloo-ye Aghdam, S., & Ahmadi, M. (2024). Theoretical and experimental investigation of the impact of oil functional groups on the performance of smart water in clay-rich sandstones. Scientific Reports, 14, 20172. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71237-1Google Scholar
Khadiev, K., & Safina, L. (2022). The quantum version of prediction for binary classification problem by ensemble methods. International Conference on Micro-and Nano-Electronics 2021.Google Scholar
Khezerloo-ye Aghdam, S., Kazemi, A., & Ahmadi, M. (2023a). Studying the effect of surfactant assisted low-salinity water flooding on clay-rich sandstones. Petroleum. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2023.09.006Google Scholar
Khezerloo-ye Aghdam, S., Kazemi, A., & Ahmadi, M. (2023b). Theoretical and experimental study of fine migration during low-salinity water flooding: effect of brine composition on interparticle forces. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 26, 228243. https://doi.org/10.2118/212852-paGoogle Scholar
Khezerloo-ye Aghdam, S., Kazemi, A., & Ahmadi, M. (2024a). Performance evaluation of different types of surfactants to inhibit clay swelling during chemical enhanced oil recovery. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 102, 481494. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.25028Google Scholar
Khezerloo-ye Aghdam, S., Kazemi, A., & Ahmadi, M. (2024b). Studying the effect of surfactant assisted low-salinity water flooding on clay-rich sandstones. Petroleum, 10, 306318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2023.09.006Google Scholar
Khezerlooe-ye Aghdam, S., Moslemizadeh, A., Madani, M., Ghasemi, M., Shahbazi, K., & Keshavarz Moraveji, M. (2019). Mechanistic assessment of Seidlitzia Rosmarinus-derived surfactant for restraining shale hydration: a comprehensive experimental investigation. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 147, 570578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2019.05.042Google Scholar
Kunapuli, G. (2023). Ensemble Methods for Machine Learning. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Li, H., Chen, J., Peng, C., Min, F., & Song, S. (2020). Salt coagulation or flocculation? In situ zeta potential study on ion correlation and slime coating with the presence of clay: a case of coal slurry aggregation. Environmental Research, 189, 109875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109875Google Scholar
Li, J., Liu, P., Chen, L., Pedrycz, W., & Ding, W. (2024a). An integrated fusion framework for ensemble learning leveraging gradient boosting and fuzzy rule-based models. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence.Google Scholar
Li, Z., Liu, F., Yang, W., Peng, S., & Zhou, J. (2021). A survey of convolutional neural networks: analysis, applications, and prospects. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33, 69997019.Google Scholar
Lin, C., Xu, J., Hou, J., Liang, Y., & Mei, X. (2023). Ensemble method with heterogeneous models for battery state-of-health estimation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 19, 1016010169.Google Scholar
Liu, B., Liu, C., Xiao, Y., Liu, L., Li, W., & Chen, X. (2022). AdaBoost-based transfer learning method for positive and unlabelled learning problem. Knowledge-Based Systems, 241, 108162.Google Scholar
Madani, M., Abbasi, P., Baghban, A., Zargar, G., & Abbasi, P. (2017). Modeling of CO2-brine interfacial tension: application to enhanced oil recovery. Petroleum Science and Technology, 35, 21792186.Google Scholar
Madani, M., Moraveji, M.K., & Sharifi, M. (2021). Modeling apparent viscosity of waxy crude oils doped with polymeric wax inhibitors. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 196, 108076.Google Scholar
Mhawi, D.N., Aldallal, A., & Hassan, S. (2022). Advanced feature-selection-based hybrid ensemble learning algorithms for network intrusion detection systems. Symmetry, 14, 1461.Google Scholar
Moslemizadeh, A., & Shadizadeh, S.R. (2017). A natural dye in water-based drilling fluids: Swelling inhibitive characteristic and side effects. Petroleum, 3, 355366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2016.08.007Google Scholar
Murtaza, M., Ahmad, H.M., Kamal, M.S., Hussain, S.M., Mahmoud, M., & Patil, S. (2020). Evaluation of clay hydration and swelling inhibition using quaternary ammonium dicationic surfactant with phenyl linker. Molecules, 25.Google Scholar
Pan, Y., Liu, H., Huang, Z., Zhang, W., Gao, H., Liang, L., … & Meng, H. (2024). Membranes based on covalent organic frameworks through green and scalable interfacial polymerization using ionic liquids for antibiotic desalination. Angewandte Chemie, 136, e202316315.Google Scholar
Putra, F., Tahiyat, H.F., Ihsan, R.M., Rahmaddeni, R., & Efrizoni, L. (2024). Penerapan Algoritma K-Nearest Neighbor Menggunakan Wrapper Sebagai Preprocessing untuk Penentuan Keterangan Berat Badan Manusia: Application of k-nearest neighbor algorithm using wrapper as preprocessing for determination of human weight information. MALCOM: Indonesian Journal of Machine Learning and Computer Science, 4, 273281.Google Scholar
Rajabi, M., Ghorbani, H., & Khezerloo-ye Aghdam, S. (2022). Sensitivity analysis of effective factors for estimating formation pore pressure using a new method: the LSSVM-PSO algorithm. Journal of Petroleum Geomechanics, 4, 96113. https://doi.org/10.22107/jpg.2022.298551.1152Google Scholar
Rana, A., Murtaza, M., Saleh, T.A., Kamal, M.S., & Mahmoud, M. (2022). An efficient, cost-effective, and green natural extract in water-based drilling muds for clay swelling inhibition. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 214, 110332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110332Google Scholar
Sarica, A., Cerasa, A., & Quattrone, A. (2017). Random forest algorithm for the classification of neuroimaging data in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00329Google Scholar
Sharifi, O., Parvizi, S., Khezerloo, S., & Ghorbanpour, S. (2022). Laboratory study of the application of a novel bio-based polymer to synthesize aphron drilling fluids. Journal of Petroleum Science and Technology, 12, 4250. https://doi.org/10.22078/jpst.2023.4873.1815Google Scholar
Shehata, A.M., & Nasr-El-Din, H.A. (2015). Zeta Potential Measurements: Impact of Salinity on Sandstone Minerals. SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry,Google Scholar
Su, Y., Cui, Y.-J., Dupla, J.-C., & Canou, J. (2022). Soil-water retention behaviour of fine/coarse soil mixture with varying coarse grain contents and fine soil dry densities. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 59, 291299. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2021-0054Google Scholar
Tangirala, S. (2020). Evaluating the impact of GINI index and information gain on classification using decision tree classifier algorithm. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11, 612619.Google Scholar
Umirzokov, A., Dilmurod, M., Asliddinjon, F., Nurzod, N., Bakhodirjon, S., Niyazmetov, A., Kurbanov, G., Eldor, M., and Khezerloo-ye Aghdam, S. (2025). Experimental study and modeling adsorption behavior of a robust cross-linker on carbonate rocks at different temperatures. Scientific Reports, 15, no. 1: 21240.Google Scholar
Vane, L.M., & Zang, G.M. (1997). Effect of aqueous phase properties on clay particle zeta potential and electro-osmotic permeability: implications for electro-kinetic soil remediation processes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 55, 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(97)00010-1Google Scholar
Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, K., Li, L., Cheng, S., & Sun, S. (2024). Development of similar materials with different tension-compression ratios and evaluation of TBM excavation. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 83, 190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-024-03674-1Google Scholar
Wang, M., Gao, F., Dong, J., Li, H.-C., & Du, Q. (2023). Nearest neighbor-based contrastive learning for hyperspectral and LiDAR data classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 61, 116.Google Scholar
Wei, C., Zhao, T., Cao, J., & Li, P. (2025). Water quality prediction model based on interval type-2 fuzzy neural network with adaptive membership function. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-025-01999-xGoogle Scholar
Wood, D.A., Mardanirad, S., & Zakeri, H. (2022). Effective prediction of lost circulation from multiple drilling variables: a class imbalance problem for machine and deep learning algorithms. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 12, 8398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-021-01411-yGoogle Scholar
Yan, T., Shen, S.-L., Zhou, A., & Chen, X. (2022). Prediction of geological characteristics from shield operational parameters by integrating grid search and K-fold cross validation into stacking classification algorithm. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 14, 12921303.Google Scholar
Yang, Y., Lv, H., & Chen, N. (2023a). A survey on ensemble learning under the era of deep learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56, 55455589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10283-5Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Liu, J., & Shen, W. (2022). A review of ensemble learning algorithms used in remote sensing applications. Applied Sciences, 12, 8654.Google Scholar
Zhou, H., Gao, S., Xie, Y., Zhang, C., & Liu, J. (2023). Multi-condition wear prediction and assessment of milling cutters based on linear discriminant analysis and ensemble methods. Measurement, 216, 112900.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y., Guan, W., Sun, Q., Zou, X., & He, Z. (2025). Effect of multi-scale rough surfaces on oil-phase trapping in fractures: pore-scale modeling accelerated by wavelet decomposition. Computers and Geotechnics, 179, 106951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106951Google Scholar