Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-9nwgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-24T17:56:08.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Halloysite Formed in a Calcareous Hot Spring Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

L. L. Ames  and
L. B. Sand
L. L. Ames*
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
L. B. Sand*
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
*
1Present address : General Electric Co., Hanford Laboratories Operation, Richland, Washington.
2Present address : Tem-Pres, Inc., State College, Pa.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An unusual halloysite deposit occurs on the west side of the Lake Mountains in Utah County, Utah. A field and laboratory study was made of this Fox deposit to determine the paragenesis of the clay minerals, especially halloysite. Successive lenses of unaltered tuff, partially altered tuff, clay and travertine beds, indicate that the clays have resulted from alteration of siliceous volcanic tuffs in a Tertiary (?) calcareous hot spring environment. Clay minerals identified were montmorillonite, kaolinite, halloysite·4H2O (endellite) and halloysite·2H20. Montmorillonite, which developed in a zone of less intensive silica leaching farthest from the hot spring vents, is the predominant clay mineral. Irregularly distributed pockets of halloysite and kaolinite developed nearest the hot spring vents in a high-calcium environment. In the clay, or associated with it, are calcite as travertine, quartz as rounded carbonate-corroded grains, feldspar, tridy- mite, biotite and glass.

Experiments that approximate the chemical environment prevalent in the halloysite alteration zone were conducted on phase relations in part of the system lime—alumina- silica—water. Results suggest the formation of halloysite·4H2O in this kinetic system from intermediate calcium aluminate or calcium silicate hydrates with halloysite-type structures, or both.

Type
Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals (National Conference on Clays and Clay Minerals) , Volume 6 , February 1957 , pp. 378 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 1957

References

Allsman, P. T. (1941) Unpublished report on the Fox clay deposit: U.S. Bureau of Mines, Salt Lake City, Utah.Google Scholar
Bullock, K. C. (1951) Geology of Lake Mountain, Utah: Utah Geol. & Mineral. Survey Bull. 41, 46 pp.Google Scholar
Crawford, A. L. and Buranek, A. M. (1948) A reconnaissance of the geology and mineral deposits of the Lake Mountains, Utah County, Utah: Utah Geol. & Mineral. Survey Cire. 35, pp. 11–14.Google Scholar
Grudemo, A. (1952) Proc. Symposium on Chemistry of Cement: London, pp. 247–253.Google Scholar
Grudemo, A. (1955) Proc. Swedish Cement and Concrete Research Institute, no. 26, p. 103.Google Scholar
Roy, Rustum and Osborn, E. F. (1954) The system Al2O3-SiO2-H2O: Amer. Min., v. 39, pp. 853–885.Google Scholar
Sand, L. B. and Amos, L. L. (1956) (abstract) Intermediate structures as a probable factor in halloysite genesis: Geol. Soc. Amer. Butt., v. 67, p. 1731.Google Scholar
Stringham, Bronson and Sharp, B. J. (1950) The Fox clay deposit, Utah: Amer. J. Sci., v. 248, pp. 726–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, H. F. W. and Howison, J. W. (1956) Relationships between calcium silicates and clay minerals: Clay Minerals Bull., v. 3, no. 16, pp. 98–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, D. E. (1955) Thermal springs and opithermal ore deposits: Econ Geol., 50th Ann. vol. 40, pp. 99–154.Google Scholar