Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-wlffp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-12T01:01:26.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of calcium solution on the mineralogy of the clay fraction and the swelling of clay soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2025

Sabah Benyahia*
Affiliation:
Earth and Universe Sciences Institute, Department of Geology, Mostefa Ben Boulaid Batna 2 University, Fesdis, Algeria Natural Hazards and Territory Planning Laboratory, Geology Department, Mostefa Ben Boulaid Batna 2 University, Fesdis, Algeria
Mehdi Mebarki
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Science and Technology, Tamanrasset University, Tamanrasset, Algeria Civil Engineering Laboratory, Risks and Soil-Structure Interaction (LGC–ROI), Mostefa Ben Boulaid Batna 2 University, Fesdis, Algeria
Nathalie Fagel
Affiliation:
UR AGEs – Clays, Geochemistry and Sedimentary Environments, Department of Geology B18, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
*
Corresponding author: Sabah Benyahia; Email: sabah.benyahia@univ-batna2.dz

Abstract

This article addresses the subject of treating clayey soils to reduce the swelling in this type of soil. The study used a calcium-rich solution and examined the influence of this solution on the <2 μm clay fraction, on the non-clay fraction and on clay soil swelling. The dissolution of clay-fraction minerals during this treatment was also examined. A mineralogical and free-swelling analysis was carried out on three natural clay soils from three different locations in Algeria. The solution rich in Ca ions had a significant influence on clay mineralogy, as all the clay minerals nearly disappeared and only traces of smectite, illite, chlorite and kaolinite remained. The almost complete disappearance of minerals after contact with the Ca solution may be linked to the high pH of the porewater, because an increase in pH accelerates the alteration of these minerals. The pH of the solution induced significant modifications in the samples, revealing the high reactivity of the minerals during this treatment. Furthermore, the treatment allowed for a nearly total reduction of the sensitivity of these soils to water (i.e. swelling).

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Associate editor: Javier Huertas

References

Al-Mukhtar, M., Lasledj, A. & Alcover, J.F. (2010) Behavior and mineralogy changes in lime-treated expansive soil at 20°C. Applied Clay Science, 50, 191198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Mukhtar, M., Khattab, S. & Alcover, J.F. (2012) Microstructure and geotechnical properties of lime-treated expansive clayey soil. Engineering Geology, 139–140, 1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldaood, A., Bouasker, M. & Al-Mukhtar, M. (2014) Free swell potential of lime-treated gypseous soil. Applied Clay Science, 102, 93103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amri, S., Akchiche, M., Bennabi, A. & Hamzaoui, R. (2019) Geotechnical and mineralogical properties of treated clayey soil with dune sand. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 152, 140150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashraf, J.M. & Walker, R. (1963) Effect of lime moisture and compaction on a clay soil. High Way Research Record, 29, 112.Google Scholar
Bauer, A. & Berger, G. (1998) Kaolinite and smectite dissolution rate in high molar KOH solutions at 35 °C and 80 °C. Applied Geochemistry, 13, 905916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, F.G. (1996) Lime stabilisation of clay minerals and soils. Engineering Geology, 42, 223237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benyahia, S., Boumezbeur, A., Lamouri, B. & Fagel, N. (2020) Swelling properties and lime stabilization of N’Gaous expansive marls, NE Algeria. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 170, 103895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boardman, D.I., Glendinning, S. & Rogers, C.D. (2001) Development of stabilisation and solidification in lime–clay mixes. Géotechnique, 50, 533543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boski, T., Pessoa, J., Pedro, P., Thorez, J., Dias, J.M.A. & Hall, I.R. (1998) Factors governing abundance of hydrolyzable amino acids in the sediments from the N.W. European Continental Margin. Progress in Oceanography, 42, 145164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. & Brindley, G.W. (1980) X-ray diffraction procedures for clay mineral identification. Pp. 305359 in: Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals and Their X-ray Identification (Brindley, G.W. & Brown, G, editors). Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Twickenham, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casagrande, A. (1947) Plasticity chart for the classification of cohesive soils. Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers, 113, 783811.Google Scholar
Chemeda, Y., Deneele, D., Christidis, G. & Ouvrard, G. (2015) Influence of hydrated lime on the surface properties and interaction of kaolinite particles. Applied Clay Science, 7, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemeda, Y., Deneele, D. & Ouvrard, G. (2018) Short-term lime solution–kaolinite interfacial chemistry and its effect on long-term pozzolanic activities. Applied Clay Science, 161, 419426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, H.E., Johnson, P.D., Matti, J.C. & Zemmels, I. (1975) Methods of sample preparation and X-ray diffraction analysis in X-ray mineralogy laboratory. Pp. 9991007 in: Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project XXVIII ($, D.E.&et al, editors). US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
De Windt, L., Deneele, D. & Maubec, N. (2014) Kinetics of lime/bentonite pozzolanic reactions at 20 and 50 °C: batch tests and modelling. Cement and Concrete Research, 59, 3442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deneele, D., Le Runigo, B., Cui, Y.J., Cuisinier, O. & Ferber, V. (2016) Experimental assessment regarding leaching of lime-treated silt. Construction and Building Materials, 112, 10321040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, S. & Kinter, E.B. (1965) Mechanisms of soil–lime stabilization. Highway Research Record, 92, 83102.Google Scholar
Eades, J.L. & Grim, R.E. (1966) A quick test to determine lime requirements for lime stabilization. Highway Research Record, 139, 6172.Google Scholar
Elert, K., Azañón, J.M. & Nieto, F. (2018) Smectite formation upon lime stabilization of expansive marls. Applied Clay Science, 158, 2936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etim, R.K., Eberemu, A.O. & Osinubi, K.J. (2017) Stabilization of black cotton soil with lime and iron ore tailings admixture. Transportation Geotechnics, 10, 8595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagel, N., Thamó-Bózsó, E. & Heim, B. (2007) Mineralogical signatures of Lake Baikal sediments: source of sediment supplies through Late Quaternary. Sedimentary Geology, 194, 3759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guidobaldi, G., Cambi, C., Cecconi, M., Deneele, D., Paris, M., Russo, G. & Vitale, E. (2017) Multi-scale analysis of the mechanical improvement induced by lime addition on a pyroclastic soil. Engineering Geology, 221, 193201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guidobaldi, G., Cambi, C., Cecconi, M., Comodi, P., Deneele, D., Paris, M. et al. (2018) Chemo-mineralogical evolution and microstructural modification of a lime treated pyroclastic soil. Engineering Geology, 245, 333343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatim, A. & Mostafa, M. (2017) The effects of compaction delay and environmental temperature on the mechanical and hydraulic properties of lime-stabilized extremely high plastic clays. Applied Clay Science, 150, 333341.Google Scholar
Holtz, W.G. & Gibbs, H.J. (1956) Engineering properties of expansive clays. ASCE Transactions, 2814, 641663.Google Scholar
Le Runigo, B., Cuisinier, O., Cui, Y.J., Ferber, V. & Deneele, D. (2009) Impact of initial state on the fabric and permeability of a lime treated silt under long-term leaching. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 46, 12431257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maubec, N. (2010) Approche Multi-échelle du Traitement des sols à la chaux – Etude des Interactions avec les argiles. PhD thesis. University of Nantes, Nantes, France.Google Scholar
Maubec, N., Deneele, D. & Ouvrard, G. (2017) Influence of the clay type on the strength evolution of lime treated material. Applied Clay Science, 137, 107114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D.M. & Reynolds, R.C. (1989) X-Ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 332 pp.Google Scholar
Rozalen, M.L., Huertas, F.J., Brady, P.V., Cama, J., Garcia-Palma, S. & Linares, J. (2008) Experimental study of the effect of pH on the kinetics of montmorillonite dissolution at 25 °C. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 72, 42244253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakr, M.A., Shahin, M.A. & Metwally, Y.M. (2009) Utilization of lime for stabilization soft clay soil of high organic content. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 27, 105113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seed, H.B., Woodward, R.J. & Lundgren, R. (1962) Prediction of swelling potential for compacted clays. ASCE Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 88, 5387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitale, E., Deneele, D., Russo, G. & Ouvrard, G. (2016a) Short-term effects on physical properties of lime treated kaolin. Applied Clay Science, 132–133, 223231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitale, E., Russo, G. & Deneele, D. (2016b) Multi-scale analysis on the effects of lime treatment on a kaolinite soil. Presented at: 1st IMEKO TC-4 International Workshop on Metrology for Geotechnics, Benevento, Italy, 17–18 March.Google Scholar
Vitale, E., Deneele, D., Paris, M. & Russo, G. (2017) Multi-scale analysis and time evolution of pozzolanic activity of lime treated clays. Applied Clay Science, 141, 3645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y., Gao, Y., Zhang, Y. & Wang, Y. (2016) Effect of fines on the mechanical properties of composite soil stabilizer-stabilized gravel soil. Construction and Building Materials, 126, 701710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar